Proxyanalyst LogoProxyanalyst
CompaniesSpecial SituationsExplorerAbout
Terms and Conditions & Privacy PolicySitemap

RUBRIK INC CLASS A (RBRK)

Sector: Information Technology

ExecutivesDirectorsTrendsAnnual MeetingProxy Filings
    Home/Companies/RBRK/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

RUBRIK INC CLASS A · Meeting: June 3, 2026

Policy v1.2medium confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

3

Directors AGAINST

0

Say on Pay

AGAINST

Auditor

FOR

Director Elections

Election of Directors — Class II: Asheem Chandna, Ravi Mhatre, and Arvind Nithrakashyap

3 FOR
✓ FOR
Asheem Chandna

Chandna has served since March 2015 and passes the TSR test — Rubrik's 3-year return of +38.8% outperforms the compensation peer group median of -14.6% by +53.4 percentage points, below the 65-percentage-point threshold required to trigger a vote against; no overboarding, independence, attendance, or familial-relationship concerns were identified.

✓ FOR
Ravi Mhatre

Mhatre has served since January 2014 and passes the TSR test on the same basis as Chandna — the +53.4 percentage-point outperformance versus the peer group median does not trigger a vote against; no overboarding, independence, attendance, or familial-relationship concerns were identified, and his Lightspeed affiliation is disclosed without creating a disqualifying conflict.

✓ FOR
Arvind Nithrakashyap

Nithrakashyap is a co-founder and Chief Technology Officer who has served as a director since January 2014; as an executive director he is subject to the same TSR test, which does not fire given the peer group outperformance; no overboarding, attendance, or other disqualifying concerns were identified, and his deep technical expertise is directly relevant to Rubrik's business.

All three Class II nominees pass the TSR trigger using the company-disclosed compensation peer group (Rubrik's 3-year return of +38.8% exceeds the peer median of -14.6% by +53.4 percentage points, which is below the 65-percentage-point threshold applicable to companies with strong positive absolute returns). No other policy flags — overboarding, attendance deficiency, independence concerns, or familial relationships — apply to any nominee. Vote FOR all three.

Say on Pay

✗ AGAINST

CEO

Bipul Sinha

Total Comp

$140,018,608

Prior Support

N/A

⚑ CEO total compensation of $140,018,608 in fiscal year 2025 (the year the performance option was reported) is extremely elevated — this was a single large award covering multiple future years reported all at once, but the reported figure far exceeds any reasonable benchmark for a CEO at a ~$10B market-cap technology company⚑ CEO fiscal year 2026 reported pay of $1,803,735 is more modest, but the multi-year performance option (grant-date value ~$139M reported in fiscal year 2025) represents the effective long-term incentive for the CEO, and no new equity was granted in fiscal year 2026⚑ CEO performance option lacks transparent annual performance conditions tied to company financials — vesting is based solely on stock price hurdles and continued service, which does not constitute a rigorous operational performance framework under the policy⚑ Non-CEO NEO RSU grants vest based solely on continued service with no financial or operational performance conditions, meaning a significant portion of variable pay effectively functions as fixed pay⚑ This is Rubrik's first say-on-pay vote (emerging growth company exemption previously applied), so no prior-year support data is available to evaluate responsiveness

The CEO's long-term incentive — a single large multi-year performance option reported at approximately $139 million in fiscal year 2025 — is structured around stock price hurdles and continued service rather than rigorous operational or financial performance metrics, which means the incentive pay does not meet the policy standard requiring meaningful performance conditions. For non-CEO named executive officers, the RSU grants vest based entirely on continued service with no explicit performance conditions, meaning a large portion of what is labeled variable compensation is effectively guaranteed pay tied only to staying at the company. While Rubrik's stock performance relative to its compensation peers is strong (outperforming the peer median by over 53 percentage points over three years), the policy requires that incentive compensation be genuinely contingent on outcomes beyond time-based vesting — and that standard is not met here for either the CEO or the other executives.

Auditor Ratification

✓ FOR

Auditor

KPMG LLP

Tenure

8 yrs

Audit Fees

$4,802,000

Non-Audit Fees

$947,263

Non-audit fees (tax fees of $792,000, audit-related fees of $152,263, and other fees of $3,000, totaling approximately $947,263) represent about 19.7% of core audit fees of $4,802,000 — well below the 50% threshold that would raise independence concerns. KPMG has audited Rubrik since 2018 (approximately 8 years), far below the 25-year tenure threshold. KPMG is a Big 4 firm appropriate for a company of Rubrik's size, and no material financial restatements were identified.

Overall Assessment

Rubrik's 2026 annual meeting presents three standard proposals plus a say-on-frequency advisory vote. The director slate receives FOR votes for all three nominees — Rubrik's stock has significantly outperformed its compensation peer group over three years, clearing the TSR threshold — and KPMG is ratified without concern given modest non-audit fees and a short tenure. The say-on-pay vote receives an AGAINST determination primarily because the CEO's multi-year performance option and the non-CEO RSU awards lack rigorous, ongoing operational performance conditions, meaning a substantial portion of what is classified as variable pay is effectively guaranteed through time-based vesting alone.

Filing date: April 15, 2026·Policy v1.2·medium confidence

Compensation Peer Group

20 companies disclosed in 2026 proxy filing

ALTRAltair Engineering
ASANAsana
BILLBILL Holdings
BOXBox
CVLTCommvault Systems
CFLTConfluent
DTDynatrace
ESTCElastic N.V.
FIVNFive9
FRSHFreshworks
GTLBGitLab
GWREGuidewire Software
HCPHashiCorp
NTNXNutanix
PCORProcore Technologies
QLYSQualys
IOTSamsara
SSentinelOne
SMARSmartsheet
TENBTenable Holdings