ICU MEDICAL INC (ICUI)

Sector: Health Care

    Home/Companies/ICUI/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

ICU MEDICAL INC · Meeting: May 13, 2026

Policy v1.2high confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

0

Directors AGAINST

7

Say on Pay

FOR

Auditor

FOR

Director Elections

Election of Directors

/7 AGAINST

Against Analysis

✗ AGAINST
Vivek JainTSR underperformance vs IHI ETF3yr absolute TSR negative -24.9pctgap -42.8pp exceeds 30pp threshold5yr TSR also negative -39.8pct no mitigantdirector since 2014 full tenure overlap

As CEO and Chairman since 2014, Mr. Jain has full tenure overlap with a severe stock decline: ICUI's 3-year return of -24.9% trails the IHI medical devices ETF (the applicable benchmark per policy) by 42.8 percentage points, well above the 30-point trigger threshold for companies with negative absolute returns; the 5-year return of -39.8% provides no mitigating offset, confirming sustained underperformance rather than a temporary dip.

✗ AGAINST
David C. GreenbergTSR underperformance vs IHI ETF3yr absolute TSR negative -24.9pctgap -42.8pp exceeds 30pp threshold5yr TSR also negative -39.8pct no mitigantdirector since 2015 full tenure overlap

Mr. Greenberg has served as a director since 2015, giving him full overlap with the underperformance period; ICUI's 3-year price return of -24.9% lags the IHI ETF by 42.8 percentage points, exceeding the 30-point trigger for negative-TSR companies, and the 5-year return of -39.8% provides no mitigating long-term track record.

✗ AGAINST
Elisha W. FinneyTSR underperformance vs IHI ETF3yr absolute TSR negative -24.9pctgap -42.8pp exceeds 30pp threshold5yr TSR also negative -39.8pct no mitigantdirector since 2016 full tenure overlap

Ms. Finney has served since January 2016 and has full overlap with the underperformance period; ICUI's 3-year return of -24.9% trails the IHI ETF by 42.8 percentage points, well above the 30-point trigger, and the 5-year return of -39.8% confirms the underperformance is sustained, not transient.

✗ AGAINST
David F. HoffmeisterTSR underperformance vs IHI ETF3yr absolute TSR negative -24.9pctgap -42.8pp exceeds 30pp threshold5yr TSR also negative -39.8pct no mitigantdirector since 2018 full tenure overlap

Mr. Hoffmeister has served since January 2018, well beyond the 24-month new-director exemption, giving him substantial overlap with the underperformance period; ICUI's 3-year return of -24.9% trails the IHI ETF by 42.8 percentage points, exceeding the 30-point trigger, and the 5-year return equally negative provides no mitigant.

✗ AGAINST
Donald M. AbbeyTSR underperformance vs IHI ETF3yr absolute TSR negative -24.9pctgap -42.8pp exceeds 30pp threshold5yr TSR also negative -39.8pct no mitigantdirector since 2018 full tenure overlap

Mr. Abbey has served since January 2018, giving him full overlap with the underperformance period; ICUI's 3-year return of -24.9% trails the IHI ETF by 42.8 percentage points, well above the 30-point trigger for negative-TSR companies, and the 5-year return of -39.8% confirms sustained underperformance.

✗ AGAINST
Laurie HernandezTSR underperformance vs IHI ETF3yr absolute TSR negative -24.9pctgap -42.8pp exceeds 30pp threshold5yr TSR also negative -39.8pct no mitigantdirector since July 2021 over 24 months

Ms. Hernandez joined in July 2021, which is more than 24 months before the current vote and therefore outside the new-director exemption; ICUI's 3-year return of -24.9% trails the IHI ETF by 42.8 percentage points, exceeding the 30-point trigger, and the 5-year return of -39.8% provides no mitigating long-term offset, though it is noted she joined during a period when underperformance was already developing.

✗ AGAINST
Kolleen T. KennedyTSR underperformance vs IHI ETF3yr absolute TSR negative -24.9pctgap -42.8pp exceeds 30pp threshold5yr TSR also negative -39.8pct no mitigantdirector since December 2021 over 24 months

Ms. Kennedy joined in December 2021, which is more than 24 months before the current vote and therefore outside the new-director exemption; ICUI's 3-year return of -24.9% trails the IHI ETF by 42.8 percentage points, exceeding the 30-point trigger for negative-TSR companies, and the 5-year return of -39.8% provides no long-term offset to mitigate the finding, though it is noted she joined during an already-underperforming period.

For Analysis

The TSR underperformance trigger fires against all seven directors. ICUI uses IHI (iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF) as the applicable benchmark per policy for medical device companies. ICUI's 3-year price return of -24.9% trails IHI's 3-year return of +17.9% by 42.8 percentage points, which exceeds the 30-point threshold applicable to companies with negative absolute 3-year returns. The 5-year TSR of -39.8% provides no mitigating offset — the 5-year underperformance is equally severe — so the vote is not downgraded to FOR under the 5-year mitigant rule. A vote AGAINST all seven directors is warranted based on sustained, material stock underperformance relative to sector peers under the current board's oversight.

Say on Pay

✓ FOR

CEO

Vivek Jain

Total Comp

$6,452,042

Prior Support

95.9%%

The CEO's total compensation of $6.45 million for fiscal 2025 is reasonable for a CEO of a $3 billion medical device company, with base salary of $775,000 held flat since 2022 and below peer median per the proxy's own disclosure. Pay mix is strongly variable — approximately 86% of target total direct compensation for named executive officers is variable, consisting of performance-based cash bonuses and equity awards (both time-based and performance stock awards with 3-year performance periods tied to Adjusted EBITDA and revenue growth), well above the 50-60% policy threshold. While ICUI's stock has underperformed over 3 years, the incentive structure is genuinely performance-linked with meaningful conditions that can result in zero payout at threshold, actual performance stock awards vested at 117% and 250% based on operational metrics, and the prior year's say-on-pay vote received approximately 96% shareholder support indicating strong investor alignment with the compensation framework.

Auditor Ratification

✓ FOR

Auditor

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Tenure

18 yrs

Audit Fees

N/A

Non-Audit Fees

N/A

Deloitte has served as ICUI's auditor since March 2008, approximately 18 years, which is below the 25-year tenure threshold that would trigger a No vote; the fee table extracted from the filing does not include numeric audit fee and non-audit fee figures in a format that allows ratio calculation, but no flags suggesting excessive non-audit fees or independence concerns are present in the proxy; Deloitte is a Big 4 firm appropriate for a $3 billion public company, and no material restatements attributable to audit failure are disclosed.

Stockholder Proposals

3 proposals submitted by shareholders

Proposal 4

Vote to Approve Amendments to the Company's Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to Adopt Simple Majority Voting Provisions

✓ FOR
Filed by:Board of Directors (management proposal)OtherCharter Amendment
Prior-year support: 51% (A stockholder proposal requesting elimination of supermajority voting requirements passed with a majority of votes cast at the 2025 Annual Meeting; the Board previously opposed it but is now implementing it.)
Board recommends: FOR
prior year stockholder proposal passedboard responding to shareholder mandategovernance improvement

This is a board-proposed charter amendment directly responding to a shareholder proposal that passed at the 2025 annual meeting, replacing supermajority voting requirements (two-thirds of outstanding shares) for director removal and related provisions with a simple majority standard. Eliminating supermajority vote requirements is a mainstream governance improvement that makes it easier for shareholders to exercise their rights and reduces entrenchment — the policy strongly supports such changes. The board's decision to implement this change after initially opposing it reflects appropriate responsiveness to shareholders.

Proposal 5

Vote to Approve Amendments to the Company's Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to Adopt a Stockholder Right to Call Special Meetings at an Ownership Threshold of 25%

✓ FOR
Filed by:Board of Directors (management proposal)OtherCharter Amendment
Board recommends: FOR
governance improvementshareholder rights enhancementno current special meeting right

This board-proposed charter amendment would create a new right for shareholders owning at least 25% of voting power to call a special meeting — a genuine improvement from the current state where only the board, chairman, or president can call special meetings. Giving shareholders a meaningful ability to convene a meeting between annual meetings is a positive governance step that increases accountability. The 25% threshold is market-standard (approximately 37.6% of S&P 500 companies with such a right use 25% or higher), and while a lower threshold would be more permissive, the improvement from zero shareholder right to a 25% right is substantial and worth supporting.

Proposal 7

Advisory Vote on a Stockholder Proposal to Establish a 10% Stockholder Special Meeting Right

✗ AGAINST
Filed by:John CheveddenIndividual ActivistGovernance
Board recommends: AGAINST
company concurrently implementing 25pct threshold via binding Proposal 510pct vs 25pct threshold differencecredible filer but company partially remediated

John Chevedden is a well-known individual governance activist whose proposals on shareholder rights deserve serious consideration, and his concerns about ICUI's stock decline and regulatory issues are legitimate. However, the company is simultaneously putting Proposal 5 to a binding vote to implement a 25% special meeting threshold — an actual, self-executing charter amendment — which constitutes meaningful partial remediation of the core concern. Moreover, the board has explicitly stated that if both proposals pass, it will implement the 25% threshold rather than the 10% threshold, meaning a vote for Proposal 7 while Proposal 5 also passes would be futile. Supporting the binding 25% right in Proposal 5 is the more effective path to shareholder empowerment; voting for this advisory 10% proposal in addition would not achieve a lower threshold given the board's stated intent.

Overall Assessment

ICUI's 2026 annual meeting ballot presents seven director elections, an auditor ratification, a say-on-pay vote, two binding charter amendments improving governance, an adjournment proposal, and one stockholder proposal on special meeting thresholds. The dominant issue is severe stock underperformance — ICUI's 3-year return of -24.9% trails the IHI medical devices ETF by 42.8 percentage points with no 5-year offset — triggering an AGAINST vote on all seven directors, while the governance and compensation proposals generally warrant support due to a responsive pay structure and meaningful shareholder rights improvements being implemented this year.

Filing date: April 2, 2026·Policy v1.2·high confidence