Proxyanalyst LogoProxyanalyst
CompaniesSpecial SituationsExplorerAbout
Terms and Conditions & Privacy PolicySitemap

CLARIVATE PLC (CLVT)

Sector: Industrials

ExecutivesDirectorsTrendsAnnual MeetingProxy Filings
    Home/Companies/CLVT/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

CLARIVATE PLC · Meeting: May 14, 2026

Policy v1.2high confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

4

Directors AGAINST

6

Say on Pay

AGAINST

Auditor

FOR

Director Elections

Re-Election of Directors

4 FOR/6 AGAINST

Against Analysis

✗ AGAINST
Andrew Snyder⚑ 3-year TSR trigger: CLVT -72.8% vs peer median -2.7%, gap of -70.1pp exceeds 20pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; director since December 2021, tenure fully overlaps underperformance period; 5-year TSR -90.6% vs peer median +1.1%, gap of -91.7pp also exceeds threshold — no 5-year mitigant available

Mr. Snyder has served since December 2021 and his full tenure overlaps with Clarivate's severe stock underperformance — the stock lost 72.8% over three years while the compensation peer group median was down only 2.7%, a gap of 70.1 percentage points that far exceeds the 20-point trigger; the five-year record (stock down 90.6% vs. peers up 1.1%) provides no mitigating improvement, so a vote against is warranted.

✗ AGAINST
Jane Okun Bomba⚑ 3-year TSR trigger: CLVT -72.8% vs peer median -2.7%, gap of -70.1pp exceeds 20pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; director since May 2020, tenure fully overlaps underperformance period; 5-year TSR gap of -91.7pp also exceeds threshold — no 5-year mitigant available

Ms. Okun Bomba has served since May 2020, meaning her tenure fully covers the three-year underperformance period during which Clarivate's stock fell 72.8% while peers declined only 2.7%; the 70.1 percentage-point gap far exceeds the 20-point policy threshold, and the five-year record is even worse, so a vote against is warranted.

✗ AGAINST
Usama N. Cortas⚑ 3-year TSR trigger: CLVT -72.8% vs peer median -2.7%, gap of -70.1pp exceeds 20pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; director since October 2020, tenure fully overlaps underperformance period; 5-year TSR gap of -91.7pp also exceeds threshold — no 5-year mitigant available

Mr. Cortas has served since October 2020, giving him full tenure overlap with the severe underperformance period; Clarivate's stock underperformed its peer group median by 70.1 percentage points over three years and by 91.7 percentage points over five years, both well above policy thresholds, so a vote against is warranted.

✗ AGAINST
Adam T. Levyn⚑ 3-year TSR trigger: CLVT -72.8% vs peer median -2.7%, gap of -70.1pp exceeds 20pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; director since October 2020, tenure fully overlaps underperformance period; 5-year TSR gap of -91.7pp also exceeds threshold — no 5-year mitigant available

Mr. Levyn has served since October 2020 and his tenure fully overlaps with Clarivate's severe multi-year stock underperformance; the three-year gap of 70.1 percentage points versus peers and the five-year gap of 91.7 percentage points both far exceed policy thresholds, so a vote against is warranted.

✗ AGAINST
Anthony Munk⚑ 3-year TSR trigger: CLVT -72.8% vs peer median -2.7%, gap of -70.1pp exceeds 20pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; director since May 2019, tenure fully overlaps underperformance period; 5-year TSR gap of -91.7pp also exceeds threshold — no 5-year mitigant available

Mr. Munk has the longest tenure on the board, having served since May 2019, meaning he has overseen the entire period of value destruction; Clarivate's stock underperformed peers by 70.1 percentage points over three years and 91.7 percentage points over five years, both well above policy thresholds, so a vote against is warranted.

✗ AGAINST
Wendell Pritchett⚑ 3-year TSR trigger: CLVT -72.8% vs peer median -2.7%, gap of -70.1pp exceeds 20pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; director since July 2022, tenure overlaps substantially with underperformance period; 5-year TSR gap of -91.7pp also exceeds threshold — no 5-year mitigant available

Dr. Pritchett has served since July 2022, meaning his tenure covers more than half of the three-year underperformance window; Clarivate's stock underperformed the peer group median by 70.1 percentage points over three years and 91.7 percentage points over five years, far exceeding policy thresholds, so a vote against is warranted.

For Analysis

✓ FOR
Kenneth Cornick⚑ Joined July 2025 — within 24-month new-director exemption

Mr. Cornick joined the board in July 2025, which is less than 24 months ago, so he is exempt from the stock performance trigger under policy; no other disqualifying factors are present and he brings relevant financial and governance experience as former President and CFO of a public company.

✓ FOR
Suzanne Heywood⚑ Joined May 2024 — within 24-month new-director exemption

Ms. Heywood joined the board in May 2024, which is less than 24 months ago, making her exempt from the TSR trigger under policy; she brings extensive operational and strategic experience as COO of a major holding company and no other disqualifying factors apply.

✓ FOR
Saurabh Saha⚑ Joined May 2023 — within 24-month new-director exemption

Dr. Saha joined the board in May 2023, which is less than 24 months from the record date, making him exempt from the TSR trigger under policy; he brings relevant life sciences expertise and no other disqualifying factors are present.

✓ FOR
Matti Shem Tov⚑ Joined August 2024 — within 24-month new-director exemption; executive director TSR trigger evaluated independently of Say on Pay

Mr. Shem Tov joined the board in August 2024 as CEO, which is less than 24 months ago, so he is exempt from the director TSR trigger under policy; this assessment is independent of the Say on Pay vote and no other disqualifying factors apply to his board seat.

Seven of the ten director nominees fail the three-year TSR trigger: Clarivate's stock declined 72.8% over three years while the compensation peer group median declined only 2.7%, a gap of 70.1 percentage points that far exceeds the 20-point threshold applicable when absolute TSR is negative; the five-year record (stock down 90.6% vs. peers up 1.1%) provides no mitigating improvement for any of these seven directors. Three directors — Cornick, Heywood, and Saha — are exempt as they joined within the past 24 months; CEO Shem Tov is also exempt on the same basis. The vote is AGAINST seven long-tenured directors and FOR the three recently appointed directors and the CEO.

Say on Pay

✗ AGAINST

CEO

Matti Shem Tov

Total Comp

$8,350,984

Prior Support

99%%

⚑ Pay-for-performance misalignment: variable pay above benchmark while TSR underperforms peers by 70.1pp over 3 years⚑ CEO total compensation of $8.35M against backdrop of severe sustained stock underperformance

While the prior say-on-pay vote received 99% support and the pay structure itself is formally well-designed (88% variable for the CEO, meaningful performance conditions on equity awards, and a robust clawback policy), the pay-for-performance alignment check cannot be passed: Clarivate's stock declined 72.8% over three years while the company paid above-benchmark variable compensation to executives, and the stock underperformed the compensation peer group median by 70.1 percentage points over that same period. The CEO received $8.35 million in total compensation in 2025 — including over $6 million in equity awards — while shareholders experienced catastrophic value destruction, and the 2023 performance stock awards paid out at only 32.5% of target but this modest reduction is insufficient to offset the overall disconnect between executive rewards and shareholder outcomes. Under policy, above-benchmark variable pay paired with more than 20 percentage points of TSR underperformance versus peers requires a vote against.

Auditor Ratification

✓ FOR

Auditor

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Tenure

9 yrs

Audit Fees

$8,366,000

Non-Audit Fees

$144,000

PwC has audited Clarivate since 2016 (approximately nine years), well below the 25-year threshold that would trigger a concern about independence; non-audit fees (audit-related fees of $142,000 plus other fees of $2,000 = $144,000) represent less than 2% of audit fees of $8,366,000, far below the 50% threshold; PwC is a Big 4 firm appropriate for a company of Clarivate's size and complexity, and no material restatements were identified.

Overall Assessment

Clarivate's 2026 annual meeting ballot presents three proposals, and the most significant concern across all of them is the company's severe and sustained stock underperformance — shares have lost 72.8% over three years and 90.6% over five years while the compensation peer group averaged small declines and gains respectively, a gap that triggers negative votes against seven long-tenured directors and against the executive compensation program. The auditor ratification is the only uncontroversial item, with PwC's low non-audit fee ratio and appropriate tenure supporting a straightforward vote in favor.

Filing date: April 1, 2026·Policy v1.2·high confidence

Compensation Peer Group

17 companies disclosed in 2026 proxy filing

ACIWACI Worldwide, Inc.
DNBDun & Bradstreet Holdings, Inc.
ENVEnvestnet, Inc.
EFXEquifax, Inc.
EXLSExlService Holdings, Inc.
FDSFactSet Research Systems Inc.
FICOFair Isaac Corporation
ITGartner, Inc.
ICLRICON plc
INFInforma plc
JKHYJack Henry & Associates, Inc.
MORNMorningstar, Inc.
SSNCSS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.
TDCTeradata Corporation
TRUTransUnion
VRSKVerisk Analytics, Inc.
WKLWolters Kluwer N.V.