CCC INTELLIGENT SOLUTIONS HOLDINGS (CCC)
Sector: Information Technology
2026 Annual Meeting Analysis
CCC INTELLIGENT SOLUTIONS HOLDINGS · Meeting: May 21, 2026
Directors FOR
3
Directors AGAINST
0
Say on Pay
AGAINST
Auditor
FOR
Director Elections
Election of Directors – Class II (Neil de Crescenzo, William Ingram, John Schweitzer)
De Crescenzo joined the board in November 2024 — less than 24 months ago — making him exempt from the TSR underperformance trigger under policy; he brings relevant CEO-level experience in healthcare technology and FinTech, and no other disqualifying flags (overboarding, attendance, independence issues) are present.
The 3-year TSR underperformance trigger was evaluated using the company-disclosed peer group (21 companies): CCC's 3-year return of -31.8% underperforms the peer median of -11.8% by 20.0 percentage points, which exactly meets but does not exceed the 20-point threshold for negative absolute TSR under the named-peer-group policy, so the trigger does not fire; Ingram also holds relevant CFO and SaaS board experience and no overboarding or attendance issues are noted.
Schweitzer joined the board on March 2, 2026 — well within the 24-month exemption window — making him automatically exempt from the TSR underperformance trigger; he brings relevant senior sales leadership experience at major software companies and no other disqualifying flags are present.
All three Class II nominees receive a FOR vote. The 3-year TSR gap versus the company-disclosed peer group of -20.0 percentage points exactly reaches but does not exceed the 20-point trigger threshold for companies with negative absolute TSR, so the TSR trigger does not fire for any director. De Crescenzo and Schweitzer are additionally exempt as directors who joined within the past 24 months. No overboarding, attendance, independence, or qualification concerns are identified.
Say on Pay
✗ AGAINSTCEO
GITHESH RAMAMURTHY
Total Comp
$987,736
Prior Support
54%%
The prior year Say on Pay vote received only 54% support — well below the 70% threshold that triggers a No vote unless meaningful changes are made. While the company conducted outreach and made some prospective changes (updating the 2026 long-term incentive plan to include a relative TSR modifier and committing to no further mid-stream award modifications), the core 2025 pay program being voted on today was not substantially restructured: the CEO received only base salary under a 2021 equity agreement that already vested a large single award covering multiple years, while other executives received equity grants under the same revenue-CAGR and adjusted-EBITDA metrics that shareholders flagged as overlapping and misaligned. CCC's stock has lost approximately 31.8% over three years while the technology sector benchmark XLK gained 86.8% — a gap of 118.6 percentage points — meaning shareholders have experienced severe value destruction while variable pay was structured around internal financial metrics rather than shareholder outcomes, and the remediation steps announced apply only to future grants, not the 2025 compensation being ratified today.
Auditor Ratification
✓ FORAuditor
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Tenure
N/A
Audit Fees
$2,220,000
Non-Audit Fees
$842,500
The non-audit fees (audit-related fees of $842,500, which include control attestation reports, consents, agreed-upon procedures, and regulatory filings) represent approximately 38% of core audit fees of $2,220,000, which is well below the 50% threshold that would trigger a concern about auditor independence; auditor tenure is not disclosed in the proxy so the tenure trigger cannot fire per policy; Deloitte is a Big 4 firm appropriate for a company of CCC's size; no material restatements are noted.
Overall Assessment
The 2026 CCC annual meeting ballot includes director elections, a say-on-frequency vote, a say-on-pay vote, and auditor ratification; all three Class II director nominees receive a FOR vote as the 3-year TSR peer-group gap does not exceed the policy trigger threshold and two of the three nominees are within the 24-month new-director exemption window. The say-on-pay vote receives an AGAINST determination primarily because the prior year received only 54% support — a significant warning sign — and while the company made prospective changes to its 2026 incentive program, the 2025 pay package being ratified today retains the same structure that shareholders rejected, against a backdrop of severe stock underperformance (-31.8% over three years versus the XLK sector benchmark's +86.8%).
Compensation Peer Group
21 companies disclosed in 2026 proxy filing