XEROX HOLDINGS CORP (XRX)

Sector: Information Technology

    Home/Companies/XRX/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

XEROX HOLDINGS CORP · Meeting: May 20, 2026

Policy v1.2medium confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

6

Directors AGAINST

3

Say on Pay

AGAINST

Auditor

FOR

Director Elections

Election of Directors

6 FOR/3 AGAINST

Against Analysis

✗ AGAINST
John G. Bruno3-year TSR underperformance vs peer group: XRX -89.7% vs peer median +54.8%, gap of -144.5pp exceeds 20pp threshold for negative absolute TSRdirector since 2024 but served as President and COO from 2022, meaningfully overlapping with underperformance periodnon-independent director

Although Mr. Bruno joined the board in 2024 and is within the 24-month new-director window, he served as President and COO of Xerox from 2022 onward, meaning he was a senior executive throughout the period of catastrophic stock underperformance (Xerox lost roughly 90% of its value over three years while the peer group gained about 55%), so the new-director exemption does not fully apply; the 5-year TSR gap of -146.9pp also exceeds the 20pp threshold, confirming sustained underperformance with no mitigation.

✗ AGAINST
Scott Letier3-year TSR underperformance vs peer group: XRX -89.7% vs peer median +54.8%, gap of -144.5pp far exceeds 20pp threshold for negative absolute TSRdirector since 2018 — full tenure overlap with underperformance period5-year TSR gap of -146.9pp also triggers; no mitigation from longer-term track record

Mr. Letier has served as Chairman since 2018, giving him full accountability for the board's oversight during a period when Xerox's stock fell approximately 90% over three years while the company's own disclosed peer group gained about 55% — a gap of roughly 145 percentage points, far exceeding our 20-point trigger for companies with negative absolute returns; the 5-year picture is equally poor (gap of -146.9pp), so there is no longer-term track record to serve as a mitigant.

✗ AGAINST
Nichelle Maynard-Elliott3-year TSR underperformance vs peer group: XRX -89.7% vs peer median +54.8%, gap of -144.5pp far exceeds 20pp threshold for negative absolute TSRdirector since 2021 — substantial tenure overlap with underperformance period5-year TSR gap of -146.9pp also triggers; no mitigation from longer-term track record

Ms. Maynard-Elliott has served since 2021, overlapping substantially with the period of severe underperformance — Xerox lost about 90% of its value over three years against peers that gained roughly 55%, a gap of approximately 145 percentage points; the 5-year data provides no mitigation, and as chair of the Compensation and Human Capital Committee she bears direct responsibility for the pay program that continued to grant large equity awards while shareholder value collapsed.

For Analysis

✓ FOR
Tami A. Erwindirector since 2024 — within 24-month new-director exemption

Ms. Erwin joined the board in 2024 and has served less than 24 months, so she is exempt from the TSR underperformance trigger under our policy; she brings relevant CEO and digital transformation experience and serves on key committees.

✓ FOR
Priscilla Hungdirector since 2024 — within 24-month new-director exemption

Ms. Hung joined the board in 2024 and has served less than 24 months, making her exempt from the TSR trigger; she brings relevant technology and operations experience from senior roles at Guidewire, Oracle, and Sun Microsystems.

✓ FOR
Edward G. McLaughlindirector since 2024 — within 24-month new-director exemption

Mr. McLaughlin joined the board in 2024 and has served less than 24 months, so he is exempt from the TSR underperformance trigger; he brings relevant technology and payments expertise as President and CTO of Mastercard.

✓ FOR
Louis J. Pastordirector since 2026 — well within 24-month new-director exemption

Mr. Pastor was appointed to the board in March 2026 and has served only weeks, making him clearly exempt from the TSR trigger under our policy; as the newly appointed CEO he is the appropriate executive director representative on the board.

✓ FOR
John J. Roesedirector since 2024 — within 24-month new-director exemption

Mr. Roese joined the board in 2024 and has served less than 24 months, exempting him from the TSR trigger; he brings deep technology and AI expertise as Global CTO and Chief AI Officer at Dell Technologies.

✓ FOR
Amy Schwetzdirector since 2024 — within 24-month new-director exemption

Ms. Schwetz joined the board in 2024 and has served less than 24 months, making her exempt from the TSR trigger; as a current CFO with a CPA background and prior Big 4 experience, she is well-qualified to chair the Audit Committee.

Of the nine nominees, three directors who have served long enough to be held accountable for the period of extreme stock underperformance — Scott Letier (since 2018), Nichelle Maynard-Elliott (since 2021), and John Bruno (who served as President and COO since 2022 before joining the board in 2024) — warrant AGAINST votes because Xerox's stock fell roughly 90% over three years while the peer group gained about 55%, a gap of approximately 145 percentage points that far exceeds our 20-point trigger for companies with negative absolute returns; the five newer directors (Erwin, Hung, McLaughlin, Roese, Schwetz) joined in 2024 and are exempt from the TSR trigger, and CEO Pastor joined in March 2026.

Say on Pay

✗ AGAINST

CEO

Steven J. Bandrowczak

Total Comp

$12,581,826

Prior Support

94.3%%

CEO total compensation of $12.58M is significantly above benchmark for a company with a $164M market cap in the Industrials sectorvariable pay materially above benchmark while TSR underperformed peer group by approximately 145 percentage points over three yearspay-for-performance misalignment: MIP paid zero but large equity grants at reported values well above what a micro-cap industrial company warrantsPSU performance period is only one year rather than the three-to-five year horizon favored by policy

Xerox's CEO received approximately $12.6 million in total reported compensation for 2025, which is far above what our policy benchmarks for an Industrials-sector company with a market capitalization of only about $164 million — a company this small would typically support CEO pay in the low single-digit millions at most; while the annual cash bonus paid zero (a positive sign), the long-term equity grants were enormous relative to the company's size, and the stock lost roughly 90% of its value over the past three years while the company's own peer group gained about 55%, meaning shareholders suffered devastating losses while executives received outsized equity awards; additionally, the 2025 performance stock awards used only a one-year financial measurement period rather than the three-to-five year horizon that best aligns executive and shareholder interests, weakening the pay-for-performance link.

Auditor Ratification

✓ FOR

Auditor

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Tenure

N/A

Audit Fees

N/A

Non-Audit Fees

N/A

auditor tenure not disclosed in available filing text — no tenure trigger fired per policyfee data not extractable from provided filing text — no fee ratio trigger fired per policy

The filing does not provide sufficient fee detail or auditor tenure data in the extracted text to trigger any of our policy's specific negative criteria; PwC is a Big 4 firm appropriate for a company of Xerox's size and complexity, and absent confirmed data to the contrary, the default vote is FOR.

Overall Assessment

Xerox's 2026 annual meeting ballot presents serious governance concerns: three long-tenured directors warrant AGAINST votes due to catastrophic stock underperformance (roughly -90% over three years versus a peer group that gained about +55%), and the Say on Pay proposal warrants an AGAINST vote because CEO pay of approximately $12.6 million is grossly misaligned with the company's $164 million market cap and its shareholders' devastating losses; the auditor ratification passes on a FOR with insufficient data to trigger any negative criteria, and a large equity plan share increase (Proposal 4) falls outside this policy's current coverage but merits careful shareholder scrutiny given the dilution risk.

Filing date: April 7, 2026·Policy v1.2·medium confidence

Compensation Peer Group

18 companies disclosed in 2026 proxy filing

CDWCDW Corporation
GIBCGI Inc.
CIENCiena Corporation
COMMCommScope Holding Company, Inc.
DXCDXC Technology Company
JNPRJuniper Networks, Inc.
KEYSKeysight Technologies, Inc.
MSIMotorola Solutions, Inc.
NATLNCR Atleos Corporation
VYXNCR Voyix Corporation
NTAPNetApp, Inc.
OTEXOpenText Corporation
SANMSanmina Corporation
STXSeagate Technology Holdings plc
TDYTeledyne Technologies Incorporated
TRMBTrimble Inc.
WDCWestern Digital Corporation
ZBRAZebra Technologies Corporation