WALKER & DUNLOP INC (WD)

Sector: Financials

    Home/Companies/WD/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

WALKER & DUNLOP INC · Meeting: May 19, 2026

Policy v1.2high confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

3

Directors AGAINST

5

Say on Pay

AGAINST

Auditor

AGAINST

Director Elections

Election of Directors for a One-Year Term Expiring at the 2027 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

3 FOR/5 AGAINST

Against Analysis

✗ AGAINST
William M. WalkerTSR underperformance vs ^MDY benchmarkexecutive director subject to TSR trigger3-year price return -33.6% with no 5-year mitigant (5-year return -52.5%)

Walker has served as Chairman and CEO since 2010, giving him full tenure overlap with the underperformance period; WD's 3-year price return of -33.6% (absolute negative) must trail the ^MDY benchmark by 20 percentage points to trigger a No vote, and given the stock's severe decline versus a mid-cap benchmark that posted positive returns over the same period, this threshold is exceeded; the 5-year return of -52.5% confirms sustained underperformance rather than a temporary trough, so no mitigant applies.

✗ AGAINST
Ellen LevyTSR underperformance vs ^MDY benchmarktenure since March 2019 covers full underperformance period3-year return -33.6% absolute negative; 5-year return -52.5% confirms sustained underperformance

Levy has served since March 2019 and her tenure fully overlaps with the 3-year underperformance period; WD's 3-year price return of -33.6% is negative in absolute terms, triggering the No vote when underperformance versus the ^MDY benchmark exceeds 20 percentage points; the 5-year return of -52.5% is also deeply negative, confirming sustained rather than transient underperformance, so no 5-year mitigant applies.

✗ AGAINST
John RiceTSR underperformance vs ^MDY benchmarktenure since July 2010 covers full underperformance period3-year return -33.6% absolute negative; 5-year return -52.5% confirms sustained underperformance

Rice has served since July 2010 and his tenure fully overlaps with the 3-year underperformance period; WD's 3-year price return of -33.6% is negative in absolute terms, triggering the No vote when underperformance versus the ^MDY benchmark exceeds 20 percentage points; the 5-year return of -52.5% is also deeply negative, so the 5-year mitigant does not apply and the Against vote is confirmed.

✗ AGAINST
Dana L. SchmaltzTSR underperformance vs ^MDY benchmarktenure since December 2010 covers full underperformance period3-year return -33.6% absolute negative; 5-year return -52.5% confirms sustained underperformance

Schmaltz has served since December 2010 and his tenure fully overlaps with the 3-year underperformance period; WD's 3-year price return of -33.6% is negative in absolute terms, triggering the No vote when underperformance versus the ^MDY benchmark exceeds 20 percentage points; the 5-year return of -52.5% is also deeply negative, so the 5-year mitigant does not apply.

✗ AGAINST
Donna WellsTSR underperformance vs ^MDY benchmarktenure since March 2021 covers majority of 3-year underperformance period3-year return -33.6% absolute negative; 5-year return unavailable for full tenure but stock was already declining when she joined

Wells joined in March 2021, giving her more than three years of tenure and full overlap with the 3-year measurement window ending in early 2026; WD's 3-year price return of -33.6% is negative in absolute terms, triggering the No vote when underperformance versus the ^MDY benchmark exceeds 20 percentage points; while she joined during a period of existing decline, her tenure now spans the full 3-year window and the 5-year return of -52.5% confirms no recovery, so mitigant conditions are not met.

For Analysis

✓ FOR
Ernest M. Freedman

Freedman joined the board in September 2025, which is less than 24 months ago, making him exempt from the TSR underperformance trigger under policy; he brings strong financial expertise as a former CFO of multiple publicly traded real estate companies and qualifies as an audit committee financial expert.

✓ FOR
Jeffery R. Hayward

Hayward joined the board in May 2024, less than 24 months before the 2026 meeting, making him exempt from the TSR underperformance trigger; his 36-year career at Fannie Mae, including heading the multifamily business, provides directly relevant expertise for Walker & Dunlop's core business.

✓ FOR
Gary S. Pinkus

Pinkus joined the board in June 2024, less than 24 months before the 2026 meeting, making him exempt from the TSR underperformance trigger; his background as Chairman of McKinsey North America brings strategic advisory and governance experience.

Of the eight director nominees, five long-tenured directors (Walker, Levy, Rice, Schmaltz, and Wells) are voted AGAINST due to sustained stock price underperformance versus the ^MDY (S&P MidCap 400) benchmark over both the 3-year and 5-year periods, with WD's stock down 33.6% over 3 years and 52.5% over 5 years while the benchmark posted positive returns; three newer directors (Freedman, Hayward, and Pinkus) joined within the past 24 months and are exempt from the TSR trigger.

Say on Pay

✗ AGAINST

CEO

William M. Walker

Total Comp

$15,500,252

Prior Support

97%%

CEO total compensation of $15.5M includes $8.2M Value Creation Award that is a single large multi-year award reported all at oncevariable pay above benchmark while TSR underperforms ^MDY by more than 20 percentage points over 3 yearspay-for-performance misalignment: stock down 33.6% over 3 years and 52.5% over 5 years while CEO receives $15.5M in 2025

The CEO received $15,500,252 in total compensation in 2025, a year in which the company's stock fell approximately 45% and the 3-year total shareholder return of -33.6% represents severe underperformance versus the ^MDY (S&P MidCap 400) benchmark, which requires only a 20-percentage-point gap to trigger a No vote given the negative absolute return; the 2025 pay package is heavily inflated by an $8.17 million single large award (the Value Creation Award) reported all at once that covers a future three-year performance period, making the headline number look far larger than the ongoing annual run rate, but even setting that aside, the CEO received $1M in salary, $1.3M in cash bonus, and roughly $6.3M in regular equity awards in a year of deeply negative shareholder returns; while the compensation structure has positive features — bonuses paid below target, three consecutive years of zero payouts under performance stock awards, and a strong clawback policy — the overall pay level relative to severely negative stock performance fails the pay-for-performance alignment test under our policy.

Auditor Ratification

✗ AGAINST

Auditor

KPMG LLP

Tenure

N/A

Audit Fees

$2,361,275

Non-Audit Fees

$1,291,855

non-audit fee ratio exceeds 50% threshold

The non-audit fees paid to KPMG in 2025 were $1,291,855 (tax fees), compared to audit and audit-related fees of $2,361,275 (combining $2,227,275 in audit fees and $134,000 in audit-related fees), producing a non-audit ratio of approximately 55%, which exceeds the 50% threshold in our policy and raises concerns about auditor independence; KPMG is a Big 4 firm appropriate for a company of WD's size, and auditor tenure is not disclosed in the proxy so no tenure trigger fires, but the fee ratio alone is sufficient to vote Against.

Overall Assessment

Walker & Dunlop's 2026 annual meeting ballot presents significant governance concerns driven by severe stock underperformance, with the company's stock down 33.6% over three years and 52.5% over five years versus a positive-returning ^MDY benchmark, leading to Against votes for five of eight director nominees and the Say on Pay proposal; the auditor ratification also draws an Against vote because KPMG's non-audit fees in 2025 were 55% of audit fees, exceeding the 50% independence threshold in our policy.

Filing date: April 1, 2026·Policy v1.2·high confidence

Compensation Peer Group

1 companies disclosed in 2026 proxy filing

^MDY__INDEX_BENCHMARK__:S&P MidCap 400 Index