VISTEON CORP (VC)

Sector: Consumer Discretionary

    Home/Companies/VC/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

VISTEON CORP · Meeting: June 11, 2026

Policy v1.2high confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

6

Directors AGAINST

2

Say on Pay

FOR

Auditor

FOR

Director Elections

Election of Directors

6 FOR/2 AGAINST

Against Analysis

✗ AGAINST
Jeffrey D. Jones3-year TSR trigger: VC -26.4% vs peer median +46.6%, gap of -73.0pp exceeds 20pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; director since 2010, tenure fully overlaps underperformance period; 5-year TSR gap of -7.4pp does not exceed 20pp threshold — 5-year mitigant applies, downgrade to FOR

The 3-year stock performance trigger fires (Visteon trailed its peer group by 73 percentage points), but the 5-year underperformance gap of only 7.4 percentage points does not exceed the policy's 20-point threshold, so the 5-year mitigant applies and the vote is downgraded to FOR.

✗ AGAINST
Sachin S. Lawande3-year TSR trigger fires: VC -26.4% vs peer median +46.6%, gap of -73.0pp exceeds 20pp threshold; CEO/executive director subject to same TSR trigger; 5-year gap of -7.4pp does not exceed 20pp threshold — 5-year mitigant applies, downgrade to FOR

As CEO and director since 2015, Mr. Lawande's tenure fully overlaps the underperformance period; the 3-year trigger fires at -73 percentage points below the peer median, but the 5-year gap of just 7.4 percentage points is below the 20-point threshold, so the 5-year mitigant applies and the vote is FOR — this determination is independent of the Say on Pay vote.

For Analysis

✓ FOR
Bunsei KureDirector since 2022 — joined within 24 months of the filing date would not apply, but tenure of approximately 4 years means TSR trigger evaluated; 5-year mitigant applies as 5-year gap of -7.4pp does not exceed 20pp threshold

Mr. Kure joined in 2022, so the 24-month new-director exemption does not fully shield him from the 3-year TSR trigger; however, the 5-year relative underperformance of only 7.4 percentage points does not cross the 20-point threshold, so the 5-year mitigant applies and the vote is FOR.

✓ FOR
Joanne M. Maguire3-year TSR trigger fires; 5-year mitigant applies — 5-year gap of -7.4pp does not exceed 20pp threshold

Ms. Maguire has served since 2015 and the 3-year peer underperformance trigger fires, but the 5-year relative underperformance of 7.4 percentage points does not exceed the 20-point policy threshold, so the 5-year mitigant applies and the vote is FOR.

✓ FOR
Robert J. Manzo3-year TSR trigger fires; 5-year mitigant applies — 5-year gap of -7.4pp does not exceed 20pp threshold

Mr. Manzo has served since 2012 and the 3-year peer underperformance trigger fires, but the 5-year relative underperformance of 7.4 percentage points does not exceed the 20-point policy threshold, so the 5-year mitigant applies and the vote is FOR.

✓ FOR
Francis M. Scricco3-year TSR trigger fires; 5-year mitigant applies — 5-year gap of -7.4pp does not exceed 20pp threshold

Mr. Scricco has served since 2012 and the 3-year peer underperformance trigger fires, but the 5-year relative underperformance of 7.4 percentage points does not exceed the 20-point policy threshold, so the 5-year mitigant applies and the vote is FOR.

✓ FOR
Marjorie T. SennettDirector since July 2025 — joined within 24 months of the filing date, exempt from TSR trigger

Ms. Sennett joined the board in July 2025, which is within the 24-month new-director exemption window, so she is not subject to the stock performance trigger and receives a FOR vote.

✓ FOR
David L. Treadwell3-year TSR trigger fires; 5-year mitigant applies — 5-year gap of -7.4pp does not exceed 20pp threshold

Mr. Treadwell has served since 2012 and the 3-year peer underperformance trigger fires, but the 5-year relative underperformance of 7.4 percentage points does not exceed the 20-point policy threshold, so the 5-year mitigant applies and the vote is FOR.

All eight nominees receive a FOR vote. The 3-year stock performance trigger fires for the entire long-tenured slate — Visteon's stock has trailed its disclosed compensation peer group by 73 percentage points over three years — but the 5-year peer underperformance gap of only 7.4 percentage points is well below the 20-point policy threshold, activating the 5-year mitigant that downgrades all triggered votes from AGAINST to FOR. Ms. Sennett is fully exempt as a new director. No overboarding, attendance, independence, or qualification concerns were identified.

Say on Pay

✓ FOR

CEO

Sachin S. Lawande

Total Comp

$16,779,811

Prior Support

89%%

CEO total compensation of approximately $16.8 million is elevated for a ~$2.9 billion market cap company in the consumer cyclical sector, but the pay structure is heavily performance-based — the company reports 91% of CEO target pay is variable or at risk — and the long-term incentive program now uses two rigorous metrics (relative total shareholder return and return on invested capital) over a three-year period, which are meaningful performance conditions rather than time-only vesting. The pay-for-performance alignment check is mitigated by the fact that the 2023 and 2024 performance stock award cycles paid out at 0% due to poor relative stock performance, demonstrating that the incentive plan does penalize executives when shareholders suffer, and prior-year Say on Pay support of 89% is well above the 70% threshold that would require action. On balance, the program structure is sufficiently performance-oriented and the committee has shown it will allow zero payouts when performance warrants, so a FOR vote is appropriate.

Auditor Ratification

✓ FOR

Auditor

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Tenure

4 yrs

Audit Fees

$3,293,105

Non-Audit Fees

$363,835

Deloitte has served as Visteon's auditor since 2022 (approximately 4 years), well below the 25-year tenure threshold, and non-audit fees of roughly $364,000 (audit-related $43,000 plus tax fees $320,835) represent about 11% of audit fees of $3,293,105, comfortably below the 50% independence threshold; no material restatements were identified and Deloitte is a Big 4 firm appropriate for a company of Visteon's size and complexity.

Overall Assessment

The 2026 Visteon annual meeting features three standard proposals: director elections, auditor ratification, and an advisory Say on Pay vote. All eight director nominees receive FOR votes after the 5-year TSR mitigant is applied — while Visteon's 3-year stock performance badly trails its peer group (by 73 percentage points), the 5-year gap of only 7.4 percentage points is below the policy trigger, indicating recent rather than sustained underperformance. The Say on Pay and auditor ratification proposals both clear policy thresholds and receive FOR votes; no stockholder proposals were submitted for this meeting.

Filing date: April 28, 2026·Policy v1.2·high confidence

Compensation Peer Group

15 companies disclosed in 2026 proxy filing

AXLAmerican Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc.
AMEAmetek, Inc.
ANSSAnsys, Inc.
CPSCooper-Standard Holdings Inc.
DANDana Incorporated
GRMNGarmin Ltd.
GNTXGentex Corporation
THRMGentherm Inc.
LCIILCI Industries
MEIMethode Electronics, Inc.
MODModine Manufacturing Company
ROKRockwell Automation, Inc.
STSensata Technologies Holding PLC
SPRSpirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc.
TRMBTrimble Inc.