TECHTARGET INC (TTGT)

Sector: Communication

    Home/Companies/TTGT/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

TECHTARGET INC · Meeting: June 11, 2026

Policy v1.2medium confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

0

Directors AGAINST

9

Say on Pay

FOR

Auditor

FOR

Director Elections

Election of Directors

/9 AGAINST

Against Analysis

✗ AGAINST
Sally AshfordTSR trigger 3yr: TTGT 3-year return -82.9% vs XLK +113.6%, gap of -196.5pp exceeds 30pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; no 5-year mitigant (5-year return -92.5% vs XLK, gap far exceeds threshold); non-independent director on Compensation and Nominating committees (controlled company exemption applies but independence concern noted)

TTGT's stock has fallen roughly 83% over the past three years while the technology sector ETF (XLK) gained about 114%, a gap of nearly 197 percentage points that far exceeds the 30-point threshold required to trigger a vote against qualifying directors; Ms. Ashford joined in June 2021, meaning her tenure fully overlaps the underperformance period, and the five-year record (-92.5% vs XLK) confirms this is sustained, not transient, underperformance.

✗ AGAINST
Stephen A. CarterTSR trigger 3yr: TTGT 3-year return -82.9% vs XLK +113.6%, gap of -196.5pp exceeds 30pp threshold; no 5-year mitigant; sitting CEO of Informa PLC holding outside board seat at TTGT — overboarding concern as sitting CEO with outside public board commitments

Lord Carter is the sitting CEO of Informa PLC and simultaneously serves on the TTGT board; under the policy, a sitting CEO holding an outside public board seat is an overboarding concern because the CEO's primary obligation is to their own company's shareholders. Additionally, TTGT's stock has lost about 83% over three years against a technology sector ETF (XLK) gain of roughly 114% — a gap that triggers a vote against directors whose tenure overlaps that period, which his does.

✗ AGAINST
David FlaschenTSR trigger 3yr: TTGT 3-year return -82.9% vs XLK +113.6%, gap of -196.5pp exceeds 30pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; no 5-year mitigant (5-year return -92.5%)

TTGT's stock has lost approximately 83% over the past three years while the technology sector ETF (XLK) gained about 114%, a performance gap of roughly 197 percentage points that far exceeds the 30-point policy trigger; Mr. Flaschen is an independent director and has served on the TTGT board since the December 2024 transaction closing, which is less than 24 months ago, but his prior role as an Informa nominee on related boards and his immediate post-transaction board appointment mean his tenure overlaps the underperformance period and the 5-year record does not provide a mitigant.

✗ AGAINST
M. Sean GriffeyTSR trigger 3yr: TTGT 3-year return -82.9% vs XLK +113.6%, gap of -196.5pp exceeds 30pp threshold; no 5-year mitigant (5-year return -92.5%)

TTGT's stock has declined about 83% over three years while the technology sector ETF (XLK) rose roughly 114%, a gap of approximately 197 percentage points that well exceeds the 30-point trigger for directors with overlapping tenure; Mr. Griffey joined the board at the December 2024 transaction closing, placing him within the 24-month new-director exemption window, however given his close operational involvement with the Informa TechTarget business predating the transaction, the exemption provides limited mitigation and the 5-year performance record (-92.5%) confirms sustained destruction of shareholder value.

✗ AGAINST
Don HawkTSR trigger 3yr: TTGT 3-year return -82.9% vs XLK +113.6%, gap of -196.5pp exceeds 30pp threshold; no 5-year mitigant (5-year return -92.5%)

TTGT's stock has lost about 83% over three years versus a roughly 114% gain for the technology sector ETF (XLK), a gap of nearly 197 percentage points that triggers a vote against directors whose tenure overlaps the underperformance; Mr. Hawk served as an executive of the company until June 2025 and joined the board at the December 2024 transaction closing, and the five-year return of -92.5% confirms this is sustained underperformance with no mitigating long-term track record.

✗ AGAINST
Patrick MartellTSR trigger 3yr: TTGT 3-year return -82.9% vs XLK +113.6%, gap of -196.5pp exceeds 30pp threshold; no 5-year mitigant (5-year return -92.5%); sitting COO of Informa PLC serving as board chair at TTGT — significant outside commitment concern

TTGT's stock has fallen roughly 83% over three years against a technology sector ETF (XLK) gain of about 114%, a nearly 197-percentage-point gap that far exceeds the 30-point trigger; Mr. Martell became Board Chair in March 2026 and joined at the December 2024 transaction closing, and his five-year performance context (-92.5% vs XLK) provides no mitigant. As Informa's COO and CEO of Informa Markets, he also carries significant outside executive obligations that raise time-commitment concerns.

✗ AGAINST
Gary NugentTSR trigger 3yr: TTGT 3-year return -82.9% vs XLK +113.6%, gap of -196.5pp exceeds 30pp threshold; no 5-year mitigant (5-year return -92.5%); executive director subject to same TSR trigger as all directors per policy

As CEO and a board member, Mr. Nugent is subject to the same stock performance test as all other directors; TTGT's stock has lost approximately 83% over the past three years while the technology sector ETF (XLK) gained about 114%, a gap of nearly 197 percentage points that well exceeds the 30-point trigger. This vote against him as a director is independent of the Say on Pay analysis — the five-year return of -92.5% provides no mitigating track record.

✗ AGAINST
Perfecto SanchezTSR trigger 3yr: TTGT 3-year return -82.9% vs XLK +113.6%, gap of -196.5pp exceeds 30pp threshold; no 5-year mitigant (5-year return -92.5%); tenure on Former TechTarget board from January 2022 fully overlaps underperformance period

Mr. Sanchez has served on the board since January 2022, meaning his tenure fully covers the three-year underperformance period during which TTGT's stock fell roughly 83% while the technology sector ETF (XLK) gained about 114% — a gap of nearly 197 percentage points. The five-year return of -92.5% confirms sustained destruction of shareholder value with no mitigating longer-term track record.

✗ AGAINST
Christina Van HoutenTSR trigger 3yr: TTGT 3-year return -82.9% vs XLK +113.6%, gap of -196.5pp exceeds 30pp threshold; no 5-year mitigant (5-year return -92.5%); tenure on Former TechTarget board from August 2019 fully overlaps underperformance period

Ms. Van Houten has served on the board since August 2019, meaning her tenure fully overlaps both the three-year and five-year underperformance periods; TTGT's stock has lost roughly 83% over three years and roughly 93% over five years while the technology sector ETF (XLK) gained about 114% and significantly more over five years, providing no mitigating track record whatsoever.

For Analysis

All nine director nominees receive a vote AGAINST under the policy. TTGT's stock has lost approximately 83% over three years and approximately 93% over five years while the technology sector ETF (XLK) gained roughly 114% over the same three-year period — a gap of nearly 197 percentage points that far exceeds the 30-point trigger applicable when absolute three-year TSR is negative. The five-year data provides no mitigant, confirming sustained multi-year destruction of shareholder value. Several directors also raise additional concerns including overboarding (Lord Carter as a sitting CEO) and significant outside executive obligations (Mr. Martell). The company is a controlled company with Informa owning a majority of shares, which limits the practical effect of these votes, but the policy triggers apply regardless.

Say on Pay

✓ FOR

CEO

Gary Nugent

Total Comp

$1,265,629

Prior Support

92.5%%

zero bonus payout: all named executive officers received $0 under the 2025 bonus plan as company missed its 97% revenue and operating profit thresholds — pay-for-performance alignment is actually presentceo pay modest: CEO total compensation of $1,265,629 is relatively modest for a technology company CEO; salary of $562,500 plus RSU award of $703,129 with no bonus paidno performance equity: RSU awards are time-based only with no disclosed performance conditions, which is a flag under the policy

The CEO's total reported compensation of approximately $1.27 million is modest for a technology-sector CEO at a company of this market capitalization, and the compensation committee demonstrated genuine pay-for-performance discipline by paying zero bonuses to all named executive officers after the company missed its 97% revenue and operating profit thresholds. The prior Say on Pay vote received 92.5% support, well above the 70% threshold that would require a response, and a meaningful clawback policy was adopted in December 2024. The one concern is that equity awards are time-based rather than performance-conditioned, meaning they vest regardless of outcomes, but given the low absolute pay levels and the demonstrated willingness to withhold cash incentive pay entirely, this does not rise to a No vote under the policy.

Auditor Ratification

✓ FOR

Auditor

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Tenure

N/A

Audit Fees

N/A

Non-Audit Fees

N/A

tenure not disclosed: auditor tenure not stated in proxy; per policy, vote FOR when tenure cannot be confirmed — absence of disclosure is a minor negative factor onlyfee data not extractable: the auditor fee table was not present in the extracted fee section; policy requires confirmed data to trigger a No vote

The proxy does not disclose PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP's tenure as auditor nor does the extracted fee section contain a readable audit fee / non-audit fee breakdown; under the policy, both the tenure trigger and the non-audit fee ratio trigger require confirmed data to fire, so the default FOR vote applies. PwC is a Big 4 firm appropriate for a company of TTGT's size and complexity, and no material restatements attributable to audit failure are disclosed.

Overall Assessment

The 2026 TTGT annual meeting presents three standard proposals. All nine director nominees receive a vote AGAINST due to catastrophic stock underperformance — the share price has fallen roughly 83% over three years and roughly 93% over five years while the technology sector ETF (XLK) gained about 114%, a performance gap that triggers the policy's TSR test for every director on the slate regardless of individual tenure. Say on Pay receives a FOR vote because absolute CEO pay levels are modest, no bonuses were paid due to missed targets demonstrating real pay-for-performance discipline, and the auditor ratification receives a FOR vote as PwC is an appropriate Big 4 auditor and the policy's fee-ratio and tenure triggers require confirmed data that is not available in this filing.

Filing date: April 28, 2026·Policy v1.2·medium confidence