TRACTOR SUPPLY (TSCO)

Sector: Consumer Discretionary

    Home/Companies/TSCO/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

TRACTOR SUPPLY · Meeting: May 14, 2026

Policy v1.2high confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

2

Directors AGAINST

8

Say on Pay

AGAINST

Auditor

AGAINST

Director Elections

Election of Directors

2 FOR/8 AGAINST

Against Analysis

✗ AGAINST
Joy BrownTSR underperformance 3yr: TSCO +5.7% vs ^GSPC +62.8%, gap -57.1pp exceeds 50pp threshold for low-positive TSR tier; 5yr TSR mitigant does not apply — 5yr gap also material; tenure since 2021 fully overlaps underperformance period

Ms. Brown joined the board in 2021 and her tenure fully overlaps the period during which Tractor Supply's stock gained only 5.7% over three years while the S&P 500 (^GSPC) gained 62.8%, a gap of 57.1 percentage points that exceeds the 50-point threshold required to trigger a vote against under our policy; the 5-year return of 41.9% vs the ^GSPC also reflects meaningful underperformance, so the 5-year mitigant does not rescue the vote.

✗ AGAINST
Ricardo (Rick) CardenasTSR underperformance 3yr: TSCO +5.7% vs ^GSPC +62.8%, gap -57.1pp exceeds 50pp threshold for low-positive TSR tier; tenure since 2019 fully overlaps underperformance period; sitting CEO of Darden Restaurants holds 2 public board seats (Darden + TSCO) — does not trigger overboarding for non-executive director rule, but noted

Mr. Cardenas has served on the board since 2019 and his tenure fully overlaps the three-year period during which Tractor Supply's stock underperformed the S&P 500 (^GSPC) by 57.1 percentage points (5.7% vs. 62.8%), well above the 50-point trigger threshold for a company with low-positive returns; the 5-year return of 41.9% also trails the ^GSPC materially, so the 5-year mitigant does not apply.

✗ AGAINST
André HawauxTSR underperformance 3yr: TSCO +5.7% vs ^GSPC +62.8%, gap -57.1pp exceeds 50pp threshold for low-positive TSR tier; tenure since 2022 — more than 24 months, overlaps majority of underperformance period

Mr. Hawaux joined the board in 2022 and has served for more than 24 months, meaning he is not exempt from the TSR trigger; Tractor Supply's stock underperformed the S&P 500 (^GSPC) by 57.1 percentage points over three years, exceeding the 50-point policy threshold, and the 5-year return of 41.9% also trails the ^GSPC, so the 5-year mitigant does not rescue the vote.

✗ AGAINST
Denise L. JacksonTSR underperformance 3yr: TSCO +5.7% vs ^GSPC +62.8%, gap -57.1pp exceeds 50pp threshold for low-positive TSR tier; tenure since 2018 fully overlaps underperformance period

Ms. Jackson has served on the board since 2018, and her long tenure fully overlaps the period in which Tractor Supply's stock lagged the S&P 500 (^GSPC) by 57.1 percentage points over three years, well above the 50-point trigger threshold; the 5-year TSR of 41.9% also materially trails the ^GSPC, so the 5-year mitigant does not apply.

✗ AGAINST
Ramkumar KrishnanTSR underperformance 3yr: TSCO +5.7% vs ^GSPC +62.8%, gap -57.1pp exceeds 50pp threshold for low-positive TSR tier; tenure since 2016 fully overlaps underperformance period

Mr. Krishnan has served on the board since 2016, giving him one of the longest tenures on the slate and full overlap with the underperformance period; Tractor Supply's stock trailed the S&P 500 (^GSPC) by 57.1 percentage points over three years, exceeding the 50-point threshold, and the 5-year TSR also trails the ^GSPC, so the mitigant does not apply.

✗ AGAINST
Edna K. MorrisTSR underperformance 3yr: TSCO +5.7% vs ^GSPC +62.8%, gap -57.1pp exceeds 50pp threshold for low-positive TSR tier; tenure since 2004 fully overlaps underperformance period; serves as Board Chair

Ms. Morris has served on the board since 2004 and as Chair since 2023, giving her the longest tenure and the most direct accountability for board oversight during the period in which Tractor Supply's stock underperformed the S&P 500 (^GSPC) by 57.1 percentage points over three years; the 5-year TSR of 41.9% also trails the ^GSPC, so the 5-year mitigant does not apply.

✗ AGAINST
Mark J. WeikelTSR underperformance 3yr: TSCO +5.7% vs ^GSPC +62.8%, gap -57.1pp exceeds 50pp threshold for low-positive TSR tier; tenure since 2014 fully overlaps underperformance period

Mr. Weikel has served on the board since 2014 and chairs the Compensation and Human Capital Committee, giving him direct responsibility for the pay programs overseen during the period in which Tractor Supply's stock underperformed the S&P 500 (^GSPC) by 57.1 percentage points over three years; the 5-year TSR of 41.9% also trails the ^GSPC materially, so the 5-year mitigant does not rescue the vote.

✗ AGAINST
Harry A. Lawton IIITSR underperformance 3yr: TSCO +5.7% vs ^GSPC +62.8%, gap -57.1pp exceeds 50pp threshold for low-positive TSR tier; tenure since 2020 as CEO/Director fully overlaps underperformance period; executive director subject to same TSR trigger as all other directors, independent of Say on Pay vote

Mr. Lawton has served as CEO and director since January 2020, and his tenure fully overlaps the period in which Tractor Supply's stock gained only 5.7% while the S&P 500 (^GSPC) gained 62.8%, a 57.1-percentage-point gap that exceeds the 50-point threshold for companies with low-positive returns; as an executive director he is subject to the same TSR trigger as all other directors, and this vote against him as a director is independent of the Say on Pay vote.

For Analysis

✓ FOR
Meg HamDirector joined board in 2023 — within 24-month exemption window from TSR trigger

Ms. Ham joined the board in 2023 and has been a director for fewer than 24 months relative to the proxy filing date, making her exempt from the TSR underperformance trigger under our policy; she brings over 35 years of retail industry experience and no other disqualifying factors are present.

✓ FOR
Sonia SyngalNew director joining in 2026 — fully exempt from TSR trigger under 24-month new director exemption

Ms. Syngal is a new nominee joining the board in 2026 and is fully exempt from the TSR underperformance trigger, which requires at least 24 months of tenure before it applies; she brings over 30 years of retail executive experience including as CEO of Gap Inc. and no other disqualifying factors are present.

Of the ten director nominees, eight long-tenured directors are voted AGAINST due to Tractor Supply's significant three-year stock underperformance relative to the S&P 500 (^GSPC) — the stock gained only 5.7% versus the index's 62.8%, a 57.1-percentage-point gap that exceeds the 50-point policy threshold for companies with low-positive absolute returns. The two new or newer directors (Ms. Ham, joined 2023, and Ms. Syngal, joining 2026) are exempt from the TSR trigger and receive FOR votes.

Say on Pay

✗ AGAINST

CEO

Harry A. Lawton III

Total Comp

$32,277,194

Prior Support

93.0%%

CEO retention award raises pay for performance concern: $20M special one-time retention grant in November 2025 substantially inflates total reported compensation to $32.3M while 3yr TSR trails ^GSPC by 57.1pp; variable pay above benchmark with TSR underperformance: above-benchmark incentive pay not aligned with shareholder experience given material underperformance vs S&P 500 (^GSPC)

The CEO's total reported compensation of $32.3 million for fiscal 2025 is significantly elevated by a $20 million special one-time retention equity award granted in November 2025 — a single large award that covers multiple future years reported all at once — which pushes his pay well above what a CEO at a $24 billion consumer-discretionary company would typically receive. The core pay-for-performance concern is that this above-benchmark variable pay comes at a time when Tractor Supply's stock has gained only 5.7% over three years while the S&P 500 (^GSPC) has gained 62.8%, a 57-percentage-point gap that means shareholders have lost significant ground relative to simply owning the broader market. While the annual compensation program structure is sound — roughly 89% of regular annual pay is performance-based, the company has a clawback policy, and prior Say on Pay support was strong at 93% — the size and timing of the special retention award during a period of material underperformance creates a pay-for-performance misalignment that warrants a vote against.

Auditor Ratification

✗ AGAINST

Auditor

Ernst & Young LLP

Tenure

25 yrs

Audit Fees

$1,562,012

Non-Audit Fees

$2,000

auditor tenure at threshold: EY has served since 2001, which is exactly 25 years — at the policy trigger threshold; no specific and compelling rationale for continued engagement disclosed beyond standard oversight language

Ernst & Young LLP has served as Tractor Supply's auditor since 2001, a tenure of exactly 25 years that reaches the policy threshold requiring a vote against unless the audit committee provides a specific and compelling rationale for continued engagement; the proxy does not disclose a concrete multi-year rotation plan, recent lead partner rotation details, or other specific justification beyond standard oversight language, so the tenure trigger applies. The non-audit fee ratio is negligible ($2,000 in other fees versus $1,562,012 in audit fees, well under the 50% threshold), and the firm is a Big 4 auditor appropriate for a company of Tractor Supply's size, so the only concern is the tenure length.

Overall Assessment

This ballot covers three standard annual meeting proposals: director elections, auditor ratification, and Say on Pay. The dominant theme across all three votes is Tractor Supply's significant stock underperformance relative to the S&P 500 — the stock gained only 5.7% over three years while the benchmark (^GSPC) gained 62.8% — which drives against votes for eight of ten director nominees, an against vote on Say on Pay due to the $20 million special CEO retention award granted during this underperformance, and an against vote on Ernst & Young's reappointment based solely on its 25-year tenure reaching the policy threshold.

Filing date: March 26, 2026·Policy v1.2·high confidence

Compensation Peer Group

1 companies disclosed in 2026 proxy filing

^GSPC__INDEX_BENCHMARK__:S&P 500 Index