ROCKET COMPANIES INC CLASS A (RKT)

Sector: Financials

    Home/Companies/RKT/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

ROCKET COMPANIES INC CLASS A · Meeting: June 10, 2026

Policy v1.2high confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

3

Directors AGAINST

0

Say on Pay

FOR

Auditor

AGAINST

Director Elections

Election of Class III Directors

3 FOR
✓ FOR
Varun Krishna

RKT's 3-year price return of +75.7% against the XLF ETF's +64.7% represents outperformance of +11.0 percentage points, which is well below the 65pp threshold required to trigger an AGAINST vote for a strong-positive TSR company; no overboarding, attendance, or independence concerns identified.

✓ FOR
Matthew Rizik

RKT's 3-year TSR outperforms the XLF benchmark by +11.0pp, far below the 65pp trigger threshold; no overboarding or attendance issues identified, though Rizik is non-independent and chairs the Compensation Committee, which is permissible for a controlled company under NYSE rules.

✓ FOR
Suzanne Shank

RKT's 3-year TSR outperforms XLF by +11.0pp, well short of the 65pp trigger threshold; Shank is independent, serves on the Audit Committee with disclosed financial expertise, and no attendance or overboarding concerns are identified.

All three Class III nominees — Varun Krishna (CEO), Matthew Rizik, and Suzanne Shank — receive FOR votes. RKT's 3-year price return of +75.7% outperforms the XLF sector ETF benchmark by +11.0 percentage points, which does not meet the 65pp underperformance threshold needed to trigger an AGAINST vote under the strong-positive TSR tier. No overboarding, material attendance, independence, or qualification concerns are present for any nominee.

Say on Pay

✓ FOR

CEO

Varun Krishna

Total Comp

$52,889,799

Prior Support

99%%

CEO Varun Krishna received total compensation of approximately $52.9 million in 2025, which is elevated but substantially driven by a one-time $25 million special integration equity award (delivered entirely as performance stock awards tied to cost and revenue synergy targets from the Redfin and Mr. Cooper acquisitions) that is not part of his ongoing annual pay structure. Approximately 95% of the CEO's target direct pay is variable and at-risk, including a meaningful portion tied to multi-year relative total shareholder return performance versus a disclosed peer group, which reflects a strong pay-for-performance structure rather than fixed pay disguised as variable. The prior say-on-pay vote received 99% support, the company discloses a clawback policy, and RKT's 3-year stock return of +75.7% outperforms the XLF benchmark, supporting the conclusion that above-benchmark incentive pay is aligned with shareholder outcomes.

Auditor Ratification

✗ AGAINST

Auditor

Ernst & Young LLP

Tenure

27 yrs

Audit Fees

$11,438,000

Non-Audit Fees

$2,042,000

auditor tenure gte 25 years

Ernst & Young has audited Rocket Companies (or its predecessor RHI) since 1999, a tenure of approximately 27 years, which exceeds the policy's 25-year threshold for a No vote. The non-audit fee ratio is within acceptable limits — non-audit fees of roughly $2.04 million (audit-related fees of $1.665M plus tax fees of $0.377M) represent about 18% of audit fees of $11.438 million, well below the 50% trigger. However, the filing's stated rationale for retaining EY emphasizes 'significant institutional knowledge from long tenure' rather than providing a compelling, specific justification for why a 27-year relationship should continue, which does not satisfy the policy's exception standard; accordingly, an AGAINST vote is warranted on tenure grounds alone.

Overall Assessment

The 2026 Rocket Companies annual meeting presents four proposals: all three Class III director nominees receive FOR votes as RKT's strong 3-year TSR outperformance versus the XLF benchmark does not trigger the policy's underperformance threshold; the say-on-pay vote is FOR given the heavily performance-weighted pay structure, a 99% prior-year approval, and positive stock performance; auditor ratification receives an AGAINST vote solely because Ernst & Young's tenure of approximately 27 years exceeds the policy's 25-year threshold without a sufficiently compelling justification provided in the filing. The TMSPP amendment is a standard equity plan approval not yet covered by current policy.

Filing date: April 29, 2026·Policy v1.2·high confidence