PRECIGEN INC (PGEN)

Sector: Health Care

    Home/Companies/PGEN/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

PRECIGEN INC · Meeting: June 18, 2026

Policy v1.2high confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

9

Directors AGAINST

0

Say on Pay

FOR

Auditor

FOR

Director Elections

Election of Directors

9 FOR
✓ FOR
Randal Kirk

PGEN's 3-year price return of +268.1% vastly outperforms the XBI (SPDR S&P Biotech ETF) benchmark by +207.2 percentage points, well above the 65-point threshold needed to trigger a concern; no overboarding, attendance, or independence flags apply to Mr. Kirk, who joined in 2008.

✓ FOR
Nancy Howell Agee

Ms. Howell Agee joined in July 2024, which is within the 24-month new-director exemption period, so the TSR trigger does not apply; she holds two outside public board seats, which is within the permitted limit for a non-executive director.

✓ FOR
Cesar Alvarez

PGEN's strong outperformance versus XBI (SPDR S&P Biotech ETF) means the TSR trigger does not apply; Mr. Alvarez has no overboarding or attendance concerns noted.

✓ FOR
Steven Frank

PGEN's strong outperformance versus XBI (SPDR S&P Biotech ETF) means the TSR trigger does not apply; Mr. Frank holds one outside public board seat and has extensive healthcare investment banking experience relevant to PGEN's business.

✓ FOR
Vinita Guptaattendance below 75 percent

The proxy discloses that Vinita Gupta was the only director who did not attend at least 75% of combined board and committee meetings in 2025, which triggers a No vote under our policy; however, all other indicators are positive, including PGEN's strong stock outperformance versus XBI (SPDR S&P Biotech ETF) and her relevant pharmaceutical industry expertise — nonetheless, the attendance policy threshold is clear and a FOR vote cannot be supported given this disclosure.

✓ FOR
Fred Hassan

PGEN's strong outperformance versus XBI (SPDR S&P Biotech ETF) means the TSR trigger does not apply; Mr. Hassan has deep pharmaceutical industry leadership experience and no overboarding concerns.

✓ FOR
Jeffrey Kindler

PGEN's strong outperformance versus XBI (SPDR S&P Biotech ETF) means the TSR trigger does not apply; Mr. Kindler qualifies as an audit committee financial expert and has relevant biopharmaceutical CEO and legal experience.

✓ FOR
Helen Sabzevari

As CEO-director, Dr. Sabzevari is subject to the same TSR trigger as all other directors; PGEN's +268.1% three-year return outperforms XBI (SPDR S&P Biotech ETF) by +207.2 percentage points, far exceeding the 65-point threshold, so the trigger does not fire.

✓ FOR
James Turley

PGEN's strong outperformance versus XBI (SPDR S&P Biotech ETF) means the TSR trigger does not apply; Mr. Turley has extensive accounting and financial expertise as former Ernst & Young Chairman and CEO with no overboarding concerns.

Eight of nine director nominees receive a FOR vote; Vinita Gupta receives an AGAINST vote solely because the proxy discloses she was the only director who attended fewer than 75% of combined board and committee meetings in 2025, triggering the attendance policy threshold. PGEN's exceptional stock performance — a three-year return of +268.1% versus the XBI (SPDR S&P Biotech ETF) benchmark return of +60.9%, a gap of +207.2 percentage points — means the TSR underperformance trigger does not fire for any director. The director slate is otherwise well-qualified with relevant pharmaceutical and biotechnology experience.

Say on Pay

✓ FOR

CEO

Helen Sabzevari

Total Comp

$5,354,329

Prior Support

97.9%%

CEO total compensation of approximately $5.35 million is reasonable for a biotech company of PGEN's size and stage, particularly given the FDA approval of Papzimeos in 2025 — a landmark commercial milestone. The pay structure is appropriately weighted toward variable compensation, with 77% of the CEO's target pay classified as at-risk, and annual bonuses were tied to specific, measurable operational goals including FDA approval, European regulatory filing, and commercial launch metrics. Last year's say-on-pay vote received 97.9% support, and the company has a meaningful clawback policy in place; no policy triggers fire here.

Auditor Ratification

✓ FOR

Auditor

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Tenure

7 yrs

Audit Fees

$1,302,100

Non-Audit Fees

$1,900

Deloitte has served as PGEN's auditor since 2019, giving it approximately seven years of tenure — well below the 25-year threshold that would trigger a concern. Non-audit fees of $1,900 represent less than 0.2% of audit fees of $1,302,100, far below the 50% threshold. Deloitte is a Big 4 firm appropriate for a company of PGEN's $1.5 billion market cap, and no material restatements have been disclosed.

Overall Assessment

The 2026 PGEN annual meeting ballot is straightforward: eight of nine director nominees are recommended FOR, with Vinita Gupta receiving an AGAINST vote due to below-75% meeting attendance disclosed in the proxy; the auditor ratification and say-on-pay proposals both pass all policy screens cleanly, supported by minimal non-audit fees, a seven-year auditor tenure, exceptional stock performance relative to XBI (SPDR S&P Biotech ETF), and a well-structured pay program tied to the company's landmark FDA approval of Papzimeos. The equity plan share increase (Proposal 4) falls outside the scope of this policy and no determination is made.

Filing date: April 30, 2026·Policy v1.2·high confidence

Compensation Peer Group

5 companies disclosed in 2026 proxy filing

AURAAura Bioscience
DAWNDay One Biopharmaceuticals
KYTXKyverna Therapeutics
REPLReplimune Group
RCKTRocket Pharmaceuticals