NOVAVAX INC (NVAX)
Sector: Health Care
2026 Annual Meeting Analysis
NOVAVAX INC · Meeting: June 18, 2026
Directors FOR
3
Directors AGAINST
0
Say on Pay
FOR
Auditor
FOR
Director Elections
Election of three Class I directors to serve on the Board of Directors, each for a three-year term expiring at the 2029 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
Jacobs joined the board in January 2023 (just over 3 years ago), and while the XBI ETF trigger technically applies given NVAX's -7.5% 3-year return vs. XBI's +70.1% (a -77.6pp gap exceeding the 30pp threshold for negative absolute TSR), the peer-group comparison — the primary benchmark under policy — actually shows NVAX outperforming its disclosed compensation peers by +30.7pp over 3 years (well above the 20pp trigger threshold), so the TSR trigger does not apply; no other disqualifying flags are present, and his industry experience and leadership through a strategic transformation support a FOR vote.
Alton has served since 2020 and holds 2 outside public board seats (Corcept Therapeutics and Brii Biosciences), which is within the 4-seat overboarding limit; the peer-group TSR comparison shows NVAX outperforming its compensation peers by +30.7pp over 3 years, so the TSR trigger does not apply, and no other disqualifying flags are present.
Rodgers joined in 2022 and holds 2 outside public board seats (Ardelyx and Opus Genetics), within the overboarding limit; the peer-group TSR comparison shows NVAX outperforming its compensation peers by +30.7pp over 3 years, so the TSR trigger does not apply, and his financial expertise as a former CFO and audit committee financial expert is a clear positive.
All three Class I nominees pass the director election screening. The primary TSR benchmark — NVAX's disclosed compensation peer group — shows NVAX outperforming the peer median by +30.7pp over the past 3 years (against a 20pp trigger threshold for negative absolute TSR), so no TSR-based AGAINST votes are warranted. None of the nominees are overboarded, all independent directors are properly classified, attendance was at or above 75% for all directors, and no familial relationships or independence concerns were identified. All three receive a FOR vote.
Say on Pay
✓ FORCEO
John C. Jacobs
Total Comp
$8,856,015
Prior Support
72.3%%
The prior year say-on-pay vote received 72.3% support — above the 70% threshold that would require demonstrated responsiveness — and the company conducted extensive stockholder outreach, contacting top 20 institutional holders representing 78% of institutional ownership, with no investors recommending changes to the program structure. CEO total compensation of $8,856,015 is within a reasonable range for a biotech company of Novavax's size and complexity (~$1.3B market cap), with a pay mix weighted heavily toward variable equity (stock options and RSUs comprising roughly 83% of total pay), satisfying the policy's requirement that at least 50-60% of pay be performance-linked. While no formal performance-based equity (such as performance stock awards) was used — the company explicitly noted this was intentional given its ongoing strategic transformation — the pay-for-performance alignment check is satisfied because NVAX's variable pay is not above benchmark relative to its peer group, and the company's 3-year TSR actually outperforms its compensation peer median by +30.7pp, meaning incentive pay is reasonably aligned with shareholder experience relative to true biotech peers.
Auditor Ratification
✓ FORAuditor
Ernst & Young LLP
Tenure
12 yrs
Audit Fees
$2,838,850
Non-Audit Fees
$1,272,028
Ernst & Young has served as Novavax's auditor since 2014 — approximately 12 years — which is well below the 25-year tenure threshold that would raise independence concerns. Tax fees (the only non-audit fees) were $1,272,028 against audit fees of $2,838,850, a ratio of approximately 45%, which is below the 50% threshold that would trigger a negative vote. No material restatements were identified, and Ernst & Young is a Big 4 firm appropriate for a company of Novavax's size and complexity.
Actual Vote Results
Meeting held June 18, 2026
Director Elections
| Nominee | % FOR | Votes For | Withheld / Against | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| John C. Jacobs | 61.6% | 43.5M | 27.1M | ✓ Elected |
| Richard J. Rodgers | 60.4% | 42.6M | 27.9M | ✓ Elected |
| Gregg H. Alton, J.D. | 58.6% | 41.4M | 29.2M | ✓ Elected |
Broker non-votes: 27.7M
Say on Pay
For 35.8M · Against 34.9M · Abstain 737,897
Auditor Ratification
For 72.9M · Against 23.6M · Abstain 2.7M
Other Proposals
Proposal 3
Amendment and Restatement of Novavax, Inc. Amended and Restated 2015 Stock Incentive Plan
Proposal 4
Amendment and Restatement of Novavax, Inc. 2013 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Overall Assessment
The 2026 Novavax annual meeting ballot presents five proposals, of which three are covered by this policy. All three Class I director nominees receive FOR votes — NVAX's 3-year TSR outperforms its compensation peer group median by +30.7pp, clearing the peer-group trigger threshold and overriding the ETF-based comparison to XBI; Ernst & Young's auditor ratification passes with a 45% non-audit fee ratio and only 12 years of tenure; and the Say on Pay vote receives a FOR determination based on a pay structure that is heavily variable, a prior-year support level above 70%, and active stockholder engagement that produced no calls for program changes. The two equity plan increase proposals (Proposals 3 and 4) fall outside the current policy scope and are placed in other_proposals without a vote determination.
Compensation Peer Group
7 companies disclosed in 2026 proxy filing