SERVICENOW INC (NOW)

Sector: Information Technology

    Home/Companies/NOW/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

SERVICENOW INC · Meeting: May 21, 2026

Policy v1.2medium confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

9

Directors AGAINST

0

Say on Pay

AGAINST

Auditor

FOR

Director Elections

Election of 9 Directors

9 FOR
✓ FOR
William R. McDermott

McDermott has served as CEO/director since 2019; NOW's 3-year return of +16.5% beats the peer group median by +12.1pp (well within the 35pp threshold for low-positive TSR), so the TSR trigger does not fire, and no overboarding or other disqualifying flags apply.

✓ FOR
Susan L. Bostrom

Bostrom holds 2 outside public board seats (Gitlab, Samsara), well below the 4-seat overboarding threshold; the TSR trigger does not apply given NOW's peer-group outperformance over 3 years, and she has no attendance, independence, or familial relationship concerns.

✓ FOR
Teresa Briggs

Briggs is a retired CPA and former Deloitte Vice Chair serving as Audit Committee Chair; she holds 3 outside public board seats (below the 4-seat limit), the TSR trigger does not apply, and she brings clear financial expertise qualifying her for the audit role.

✓ FOR
Paul E. Chamberlain

Chamberlain holds 1 outside public board seat; he is designated as an audit committee financial expert, the TSR trigger does not apply, and no overboarding, attendance, or independence concerns are identified.

✓ FOR
Lawrence J. Jackson, Jr.

Jackson holds 0 outside public board seats; the TSR trigger does not apply given peer-group outperformance, and his consumer/creative technology background is relevant to ServiceNow's AI and platform strategy.

✓ FOR
Frederic B. Luddy

Luddy is the company's founder with deep software expertise and 0 outside public board seats; the TSR trigger does not apply, and while he is classified as non-independent, he does not serve on the audit or compensation committee, so no policy trigger fires.

✓ FOR
Joseph "Larry" Quinlan

Quinlan holds 2 outside public board seats (Jones Lang LaSalle, Booking Holdings); the TSR trigger does not apply, and his background as Global CIO of Deloitte provides directly relevant technology and risk management expertise.

✓ FOR
Anita M. Sands

Sands holds 1 outside public board seat (Nu Holdings); the TSR trigger does not apply, and her financial services and transformation leadership experience supports her roles on the Compensation and Governance committees.

✓ FOR
Eric S. Yuan

Yuan is a new nominee (exempt from the TSR trigger as a first-time candidate); he holds 2 outside public board seats (Zoom, Intuit) as a sitting public-company CEO, which reaches the 2-seat threshold for sitting CEOs under the overboarding policy — however, one of those seats is his own company (Zoom), and the policy's sitting-CEO overboarding concern is directed at outside commitments beyond the CEO's own firm, meaning Yuan effectively holds 1 true outside seat (Intuit), leaving no overboarding trigger; his deep enterprise software and engineering expertise is directly relevant to ServiceNow's strategy.

All nine director nominees pass the policy screens: the TSR trigger does not apply because NOW's 3-year return of +16.5% outperforms the disclosed peer group median by +12.1pp, well inside the 35pp underperformance threshold for low-positive TSR. No nominee is overboarded, no audit or compensation committee member is non-independent, no attendance failures were reported for current nominees, and no familial relationships with senior management are disclosed. Eric Yuan is a new nominee and is therefore exempt from the TSR trigger. All nine receive a FOR vote.

Say on Pay

✗ AGAINST

CEO

William R. McDermott

Total Comp

$51,550,957

Prior Support

89%%

CEO total compensation of $51.6M is materially above benchmark for a Technology sector CEO at this market cap bandCEO individual pay threshold exceeded: >+20% above benchmark triggers No vote

CEO William McDermott received total compensation of $51.6 million in 2025, which is substantially above the benchmark for a Technology sector CEO at ServiceNow's approximately $108 billion market cap — even accounting for the large-cap premium, this level of pay significantly exceeds the +20% individual CEO threshold that triggers a No vote under our policy. On the pay-for-performance side, NOW's 3-year stock return of +16.5% outperforms the company-disclosed peer group median by +12.1pp, which is a genuine positive; however, the absolute pay quantum remains an independent concern — peers who outperform can still pay too much in absolute terms. The prior year's 89% support clears the 70% floor so no engagement failure is flagged, pay mix is heavily performance-based and the clawback policy is in place, but the CEO pay level alone is sufficient under our policy to warrant a No vote.

Auditor Ratification

✓ FOR

Auditor

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Tenure

N/A

Audit Fees

$8,648,000

Non-Audit Fees

$2,030,000

Non-audit fees (audit-related fees of $650K + tax fees of $1,370K + other fees of $10K = $2,030K) represent approximately 23% of audit fees ($8,648K), well below the 50% threshold that would raise independence concerns; auditor tenure is not explicitly disclosed in the proxy so the tenure trigger cannot fire per policy; PwC is a Big 4 firm appropriate for a company of ServiceNow's size and complexity.

Stockholder Proposals

1 proposal submitted by shareholders

Proposal 6

Shareholder Proposal Regarding Shareholder Right to Act by Written Consent

✓ FOR
Filed by:John CheveddenIndividual ActivistGovernance
Board recommends: AGAINST
Credible individual governance activist filer with strong track recordGovernance structural ask — lower bar to supportCompany's special meeting threshold (15% ownership held for at least 1 year) is more restrictive than the Delaware default (10%) and imposes a holding-period requirement that limits which shareholders can act between annual meetingsCompany opposition does not fully rebut the governance gap

John Chevedden is a well-known individual governance activist whose proposals focus on shareholder rights and are taken seriously under our policy. The proposal asks for the right to act by written consent, which is a mainstream governance improvement that gives shareholders an additional tool to act between annual meetings when pressing issues arise — particularly relevant here given ServiceNow's stock dropped over 30% in the past year while the technology sector (XLK) gained roughly 41%. ServiceNow's existing special meeting right carries a 15% ownership threshold combined with a one-year holding-period requirement, which is more restrictive than the 10% Delaware default Chevedden references and excludes the shareholders most likely to raise urgent governance concerns; the company's opposition statement does not persuasively explain why this combination of restrictions is in shareholders' best interests, and adding written consent as a complementary right would meaningfully strengthen shareholder accountability without removing any existing protections.

Overall Assessment

ServiceNow's 2026 annual meeting features nine director nominees who all pass the policy screens (peer-relative TSR outperformance eliminates the underperformance trigger), a clean auditor ratification with low non-audit fees, and a stockholder proposal from governance activist John Chevedden on written consent rights that merits support given the company's restrictive special meeting requirements. The sole Against vote is on Say on Pay, driven by CEO total compensation of $51.6 million that exceeds the individual CEO benchmark threshold under our policy despite a strong pay-for-performance structure and 89% prior-year shareholder support.

Filing date: April 6, 2026·Policy v1.2·medium confidence

Compensation Peer Group

16 companies disclosed in 2026 proxy filing

ADBEAdobe
ABNBAirbnb
TEAMAtlassian
XYZBlock
EBAYeBay
EAElectronic Arts
INTUIntuit
NFLXNetflix
ORCLOracle
PANWPalo Alto Networks
PYPLPayPal Holdings
CRMSalesforce
SNOWSnowflake
UBERUber
VVisa
WDAYWorkday