MAXLINEAR INC (MXL)
Sector: Information Technology
2026 Annual Meeting Analysis
MAXLINEAR INC · Meeting: May 20, 2026
Directors FOR
2
Directors AGAINST
0
Say on Pay
FOR
Auditor
FOR
Director Elections
Election of Two Class II Directors
Ms. Beaver has served since December 2018 (over 7 years), bringing deep financial and accounting expertise as a former KPMG audit partner and CFO; MXL's 3-year total return of +176.5% outperforms the peer group median by +118.9 percentage points, far exceeding the 65-point threshold needed to trigger a concern, so no TSR flag applies, and no other policy concerns are present.
Dr. Tewksbury has served since May 2015 (over 10 years) and brings extensive semiconductor CEO and board experience directly relevant to MXL's business; MXL's 3-year total return of +176.5% outperforms the peer group median by +118.9 percentage points, well above the 65-point trigger threshold for strong positive absolute returns, and no other policy concerns are identified.
Both Class II director nominees pass all policy screens: MXL's strong 3-year stock performance (outperforming its disclosed peer group median by approximately 119 percentage points) clears the TSR trigger threshold, neither director is overboarded, both have relevant industry qualifications, attendance was reported at 75% or above for all directors, and no independence, familial relationship, or other governance concerns were identified.
Say on Pay
✓ FORCEO
Kishore Seendripu, Ph.D.
Total Comp
$7,817,568
Prior Support
less than 50%%
At the 2025 annual meeting, the advisory vote on 2024 executive compensation received less than 50% support — a significant shareholder rebuke that would normally trigger a No vote under our policy if no visible changes were made. However, the compensation committee responded substantively: it engaged directly with shareholders representing more than 50% of outstanding shares (with the compensation committee chair personally meeting with top-five holders), and for 2025 it redesigned the performance-based equity award program to measure company revenue and operating income goals over a three-year period and shifted the relative performance metric to the broader Russell 3000 index, which are meaningful structural improvements. Because the company made visible, substantive changes to its compensation program in direct response to the failed vote — rather than simply ignoring shareholder feedback — the prior-year trigger does not result in a No vote, and the 2025 compensation program, with approximately 78% of CEO pay in long-term equity that is heavily performance-based, reflects a pay mix that aligns executive outcomes with shareholder interests.
Auditor Ratification
✓ FORAuditor
Grant Thornton LLP
Tenure
10 yrs
Audit Fees
$1,477,287
Non-Audit Fees
$142,560
Grant Thornton LLP's non-audit fees (tax compliance work of $142,560) represent approximately 9.6% of audit fees ($1,477,287), well below the 50% threshold that would raise independence concerns; auditor tenure since 2016 is approximately 10 years, comfortably below the 25-year threshold; no material financial restatements were disclosed; and Grant Thornton is a large national firm appropriate for a company of MXL's size and complexity.
Actual Vote Results
Meeting held May 20, 2026
Director Elections
| Nominee | % FOR | Votes For | Withheld / Against | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carolyn D. Beaver | 96.2% | 72.8M | 2.6M | ✓ Elected |
| Theodore L. Tewksbury, Ph.D. | 89.2% | 67.5M | 7.9M | ✓ Elected |
Broker non-votes: 8.7M
Say on Pay
For 64.0M · Against 11.3M · Abstain 394,892
Auditor Ratification
For 83.8M · Against 182,307 · Abstain 476,835
Other Proposals
Proposal 4
Approval of Amendment and Restatement of the MaxLinear, Inc. Amended and Restated 2010 Equity Incentive Plan
Proposal 5
Approval of Amendment and Restatement of the MaxLinear, Inc. 2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Overall Assessment
The 2026 MaxLinear annual meeting ballot is generally straightforward: both Class II director nominees are well-qualified and pass all policy screens given MXL's exceptional 3-year stock performance that significantly outpaces its disclosed peer group, and the auditor ratification presents no fee ratio or tenure concerns. The most notable governance issue is the 2025 Say on Pay vote which received below-50% support for 2024 compensation — but because management engaged substantively with shareholders and made visible structural changes to the 2025 performance-based equity program in response, a FOR determination is warranted on the 2026 advisory vote.
Compensation Peer Group
24 companies disclosed in 2026 proxy filing