MODERNA INC (MRNA)

Sector: Health Care

    Home/Companies/MRNA/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

MODERNA INC · Meeting: May 6, 2026

Policy v1.2high confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

1

Directors AGAINST

1

Say on Pay

FOR

Auditor

FOR

Director Elections

Election of Directors

1 FOR/1 AGAINST

Against Analysis

✗ AGAINST
Sandra Horning, M.D.3-year TSR underperformance vs XBI ETF fallback: MRNA -63.5% absolute (negative), gap of -86.9pp vs XLV; XBI fallback threshold for negative absolute TSR is 30pp — trigger fires5-year TSR also negative (-61.9%) and gap vs benchmark remains severe — no 5-year mitigant appliesDirector joined 2020, tenure fully overlaps underperformance period

Dr. Horning has served since 2020, meaning her entire tenure overlaps with Moderna's severe stock decline of -63.5% over three years, which falls 86.9 percentage points below the healthcare biotech benchmark (XBI), far exceeding the 30-point trigger threshold for companies with negative absolute returns; the five-year record is equally poor (-61.9%), so no mitigating upgrade applies.

For Analysis

✓ FOR
Abbas Hussain

Mr. Hussain joined the board in 2024, which is within the 24-month new-director exemption window, so he is not subject to the TSR underperformance trigger; he brings relevant pharmaceutical commercialization and CEO experience that is directly useful to Moderna's current stage.

Of the two Class II nominees, Abbas Hussain receives a FOR vote because he joined within the past 24 months and is exempt from the TSR trigger. Sandra Horning receives an AGAINST vote because she has served since 2020 and Moderna's stock has declined -63.5% over three years — 86.9 percentage points below the XBI biotech benchmark, far exceeding the 30-point threshold that applies when absolute returns are negative, and the five-year record provides no relief.

Say on Pay

✓ FOR

CEO

Stéphane Bancel

Total Comp

$19,932,217

Prior Support

77%%

The prior year say-on-pay vote received 77% support, above the 70% threshold that would require demonstrated change, and the company has made visible responsive actions including freezing 2026 base salaries and bonus targets, granting no special retention awards to executives, and tightening the peer group. CEO total compensation of approximately $19.9 million is heavily weighted toward at-risk pay (91% variable per the proxy), which is structurally sound even though Moderna's stock has underperformed — the key question for pay level is whether the program design is appropriate, and the PSU track record (2022 PSUs vesting at 55% of target, 2023 PSUs at 50%) and underwater stock options show that actual realized pay has been materially reduced in line with shareholder experience. The pay-for-performance alignment check is satisfied because realizable CEO pay ranked at the 20th percentile among peers over three years, consistent with TSR ranking at the bottom of the peer group.

Auditor Ratification

✓ FOR

Auditor

Ernst & Young LLP

Tenure

N/A

Audit Fees

$5,140,389

Non-Audit Fees

$214,987

Non-audit fees (tax advisory plus other fees totaling $214,987) represent approximately 4.2% of audit fees ($5,140,389), well below the 50% threshold that would raise independence concerns; Ernst & Young is a Big 4 firm appropriate for a company of Moderna's size, and no material restatements were disclosed; auditor tenure was not disclosed in the proxy, so the tenure trigger does not fire per policy.

Overall Assessment

The 2026 Moderna annual meeting presents four proposals; the most consequential governance issue is the director election, where Sandra Horning receives an AGAINST vote due to severe stock underperformance during her tenure while Abbas Hussain is exempt as a new director, and the say-on-pay vote receives a FOR recommendation based on a structurally sound at-risk pay program with evidence that realized pay has tracked the stock decline. The auditor ratification is straightforward with minimal non-audit fees and a Big 4 firm, and the say-on-frequency proposal is a housekeeping item best resolved with an annual vote.

Filing date: March 16, 2026·Policy v1.2·high confidence