Hyde has served since 2017, giving her full overlap with the severe 3-year price decline of -49.5%; the company's 3-year TSR is deeply negative, and based on the disclosed peer group (automotive aftermarket and specialty retail companies), underperformance almost certainly exceeds the 20 percentage point threshold for negative absolute TSR; the 5-year TSR of -67.3% provides no mitigating relief as long-term performance is also deeply negative.

Johnson has served since 2020, giving her meaningful overlap with the 3-year period of severe stock underperformance (-49.5% price return); with a negative absolute 3-year TSR, the trigger threshold is 20 percentage points below peer median, which the company almost certainly breaches given the magnitude of decline; the 5-year TSR of -67.3% confirms this is not a transient downturn, so no 5-year mitigant applies.

McCluski has served since 2013, giving him the longest tenure overlap with the sustained underperformance; the 3-year price return of -49.5% is deeply negative and the 5-year return of -67.3% shows no recovery trend, meaning neither the 3-year nor 5-year mitigant applies, making an against vote appropriate.

Mellor has served since 2010 and chairs the board, making him the director most accountable for the sustained destruction of shareholder value; with a 3-year price return of -49.5% and 5-year return of -67.3%, neither the 3-year trigger nor the 5-year mitigant offers relief, and his role as board chairman during this period makes the accountability concern especially acute.

Solomon has served since 1984 — the longest-tenured director on the board — giving him full overlap with the company's severe underperformance; the 3-year price return of -49.5% and 5-year return of -67.3% both indicate sustained value destruction well beyond any applicable threshold, and no 5-year mitigant applies.