MANNKIND CORP (MNKD)

Sector: Health Care

    Home/Companies/MNKD/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

MANNKIND CORP · Meeting: May 20, 2026

Policy v1.2high confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

1

Directors AGAINST

8

Say on Pay

FOR

Auditor

AGAINST

Director Elections

Election of Nine Directors

1 FOR/8 AGAINST

Against Analysis

✗ AGAINST
James S. Shannon, M.D.3-year TSR trigger: MNKD -36.9% vs peer median +33.3%, gap of -70.2pp exceeds 20pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; director since 2015, tenure fully overlaps underperformance period; 5-year gap of -33.9pp vs peer median -5.8% also exceeds 20pp threshold, so 5-year mitigant does not apply

Dr. Shannon has served since 2015 and MannKind's stock has fallen roughly 37% over three years while the company's own peer group gained an average of 33%, a gap of about 70 percentage points that far exceeds our 20-point trigger; checking the five-year record does not rescue the vote because MannKind also significantly trails peers over five years, so the underperformance appears sustained rather than temporary.

✗ AGAINST
Michael E. Castagna, Pharm.D.3-year TSR trigger: MNKD -36.9% vs peer median +33.3%, gap of -70.2pp exceeds 20pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; director since 2017, tenure fully overlaps underperformance period; 5-year gap of -33.9pp vs peer median -5.8% also exceeds 20pp threshold, so 5-year mitigant does not apply; executive director (CEO) subject to same TSR trigger independently of Say on Pay vote

As both CEO and a board director since 2017, Dr. Castagna bears direct accountability for MannKind's sustained stock underperformance; the company's shares have lost about 37% over three years while the peer group gained 33%, a 70-point gap well above the policy threshold, and the five-year picture is equally weak, so the TSR trigger fires on both timeframes with no mitigating relief.

✗ AGAINST
Ronald J. Consiglio3-year TSR trigger: MNKD -36.9% vs peer median +33.3%, gap of -70.2pp exceeds 20pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; director since 2003, tenure fully overlaps underperformance period; 5-year gap of -33.9pp vs peer median -5.8% also exceeds 20pp threshold, so 5-year mitigant does not apply

Mr. Consiglio has been a director since 2003, meaning his entire tenure fully overlaps MannKind's current underperformance; the company's 70-point three-year gap versus its own peers far exceeds the policy trigger, and the five-year record offers no relief, so a vote against is warranted.

✗ AGAINST
Michael A. Friedman, M.D.3-year TSR trigger: MNKD -36.9% vs peer median +33.3%, gap of -70.2pp exceeds 20pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; director since 2003, tenure fully overlaps underperformance period; 5-year gap of -33.9pp vs peer median -5.8% also exceeds 20pp threshold, so 5-year mitigant does not apply

Dr. Friedman has served since 2003 and his long tenure means he has been on the board throughout the period of sustained underperformance; with a 70-point three-year gap versus peers and an equally weak five-year comparison, the TSR trigger applies with no mitigating factors.

✗ AGAINST
Jennifer Grancio3-year TSR trigger: MNKD -36.9% vs peer median +33.3%, gap of -70.2pp exceeds 20pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; director since March 2020, tenure exceeds 24 months and materially overlaps underperformance period; 5-year gap of -33.9pp vs peer median -5.8% also exceeds 20pp threshold, so 5-year mitigant does not apply

Ms. Grancio joined in March 2020, now more than five years ago, so she falls well outside the 24-month new-director exemption; MannKind's 70-point underperformance gap versus its own peers over three years triggers the policy, and the five-year record confirms sustained underperformance rather than a temporary dip.

✗ AGAINST
Anthony Hooper3-year TSR trigger: MNKD -36.9% vs peer median +33.3%, gap of -70.2pp exceeds 20pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; director since January 2020, tenure exceeds 24 months and materially overlaps underperformance period; 5-year gap of -33.9pp vs peer median -5.8% also exceeds 20pp threshold, so 5-year mitigant does not apply

Mr. Hooper has served since January 2020, placing him well beyond the 24-month exemption; the company's 70-point gap behind its own peer group over three years clears the trigger threshold, and the five-year comparison does not offer relief, making a vote against appropriate.

✗ AGAINST
Sabrina Kay, Ed.D.3-year TSR trigger: MNKD -36.9% vs peer median +33.3%, gap of -70.2pp exceeds 20pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; director since December 2020, tenure exceeds 24 months and materially overlaps underperformance period; 5-year gap of -33.9pp vs peer median -5.8% also exceeds 20pp threshold, so 5-year mitigant does not apply

Dr. Kay joined in December 2020, now more than four years ago and beyond the new-director exemption window; MannKind's persistent underperformance versus its own peer group — a 70-point three-year gap and a similarly weak five-year record — triggers the policy vote against.

✗ AGAINST
Christine Mundkur3-year TSR trigger: MNKD -36.9% vs peer median +33.3%, gap of -70.2pp exceeds 20pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; director since November 2018, tenure fully overlaps underperformance period; 5-year gap of -33.9pp vs peer median -5.8% also exceeds 20pp threshold, so 5-year mitigant does not apply

Ms. Mundkur has served since November 2018 and her tenure fully overlaps the period of underperformance; the 70-point gap versus peers over three years triggers the policy, and the five-year track record confirms this is not a transient dip, so a vote against is warranted.

For Analysis

✓ FOR
Steven B. BinderDirector joined October 2024 — within 24-month exemption window; TSR trigger exempt

Mr. Binder joined the board in October 2024, which is within the 24-month new-director exemption period, so he cannot fairly be held accountable for underperformance that predates his joining, and no other disqualifying factors are present.

Eight of the nine nominees trigger the TSR underperformance policy. MannKind's stock has lost about 37% over three years while the company's own disclosed peer group gained an average of 33%, a 70-point gap that far exceeds the 20-point threshold applicable when a company's absolute returns are negative. The five-year comparison also fails to provide relief, as the company trails peers by about 34 points over that longer window. Only Steven Binder, who joined the board in October 2024 and falls within the 24-month new-director exemption, receives a FOR vote. All other directors — including CEO Michael Castagna in his role as a board member — receive AGAINST votes under the sustained-underperformance trigger.

Say on Pay

✓ FOR

CEO

Michael E. Castagna

Total Comp

$9,300,485

Prior Support

91%%

The prior year say-on-pay vote received strong 91% support, well above the 70% threshold that would require a response, and the program's structure is sound: approximately 69% of CEO pay is performance-based (above the 50-60% minimum), the company has a Dodd-Frank-compliant clawback policy, the long-term equity awards use multi-year relative total shareholder return against a public index as the primary vesting metric (which is a strong, hard-to-manipulate measure), and the short-term bonus payout of 107% of target reflects genuine goal achievement rather than automatic payment. While MannKind's stock has underperformed its peers significantly, the incentive pay structure itself — with performance stock units that pay zero if the company finishes below the 25th percentile of the Russell 3000 Pharma & Biotech index — is appropriately designed to align executive and shareholder outcomes going forward, and the structure does not show the hallmarks of pay-for-failure that would warrant a vote against.

Auditor Ratification

✗ AGAINST

Auditor

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Tenure

25 yrs

Audit Fees

$1,696,228

Non-Audit Fees

$0

Auditor tenure of 25 years meets the ≥25-year threshold — no compelling rationale for continued engagement disclosed

Deloitte has audited MannKind continuously since 2001, a relationship of exactly 25 years that meets the policy's tenure threshold for a negative vote; while the fee structure is clean — 100% audit fees with zero non-audit fees — the proxy does not disclose any specific and compelling rationale (such as a concrete lead-partner rotation plan or exceptional audit quality metrics) that would justify continued engagement at this tenure level.

Overall Assessment

MannKind's 2026 annual meeting presents a challenging ballot driven primarily by the company's severe stock underperformance — shares have lost about 37% over three years while the company's own peer group gained 33%, a 70-point gap that triggers policy-based AGAINST votes for eight of nine director nominees (all except the recently appointed Steven Binder). The auditor ratification also draws an AGAINST vote because Deloitte has now served for exactly 25 years with no specific justification for continued engagement disclosed in the proxy; the one bright spot is Say on Pay, which receives a FOR vote because the program's structure is genuinely performance-oriented with multi-year relative TSR vesting conditions and strong prior-year shareholder support of 91%.

Filing date: April 7, 2026·Policy v1.2·high confidence

Compensation Peer Group

13 companies disclosed in 2026 proxy filing

ADMAADMA Biologics, Inc.
ANIKAnika Therapeutics, Inc.
BCRXBioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
DVAXDynavax Technologies Corporation
INSMInsmed Inc.
IRWDIronwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
KPTIKaryopharm Therapeutics Inc.
KRYSKrystal Biotech, Inc.
MGNXMacroGenics Inc.
MIRMMirum Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
RIGLRigel Pharmaceuticals Inc.
TVTXTravere Therapeutics, Inc.
VNDAVanda Pharmaceuticals Inc.