Proxyanalyst LogoProxyanalyst
CompaniesSpecial SituationsExplorerAbout
Terms and Conditions & Privacy PolicySitemap

RAMACO RESOURCES INC CLASS A (METC)

Sector: Materials

ExecutivesDirectorsTrendsAnnual MeetingProxy Filings
    Home/Companies/METC/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

RAMACO RESOURCES INC CLASS A · Meeting: June 10, 2026

Policy v1.2high confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

3

Directors AGAINST

0

Say on Pay

AGAINST

Auditor

FOR

Director Elections

Election of Directors

3 FOR
✓ FOR
Bryan H. Lawrence

Mr. Lawrence has served since December 2016 and brings extensive energy industry private equity experience; METC's 3-year price return of +87.2% outperforms the XLB sector ETF benchmark by +49.5 percentage points, which does not meet the 65-percentage-point threshold needed to trigger an against vote for a strong-positive TSR company, and no other policy flags apply (no overboarding concern confirmed, no attendance issue disclosed).

✓ FOR
David E.K. Frischkorn Jr.

Mr. Frischkorn has served since January 2021 and brings over 40 years of energy investment banking experience; the TSR trigger does not fire given METC's strong 3-year outperformance versus both the XLB ETF and the named peer group, all attendance, independence, and committee requirements are met.

✓ FOR
Michael R. Graney

Mr. Graney joined the board in September 2025, which is less than 24 months ago, making him exempt from the TSR performance trigger under policy; he brings relevant Appalachian economic development and energy executive experience appropriate for a coal company.

All three nominees pass policy screens: METC's 3-year total return of +87.2% outperforms the XLB sector ETF by +49.5 percentage points (below the 65-percentage-point trigger threshold for strong-positive TSR companies) and outperforms the named compensation peer group median by +65.4 percentage points (below the 65-percentage-point threshold for named peers at strong-positive TSR), no overboarding or attendance issues are disclosed, and Michael Graney is exempt as a director of less than 24 months tenure.

Say on Pay

✗ AGAINST

CEO

Randall W. Atkins

Total Comp

$9,206,767

Prior Support

N/A

⚑ CEO total compensation of $9,206,767 is likely above benchmark for a ~$964M market cap Basic Materials company⚑ CEO base salary of $1,000,000 represents only ~10.9% of total compensation — fixed pay well below 40% threshold, but total pay level is elevated⚑ Annual bonus paid at 122% of target despite company posting a net loss of $51.4M and Adjusted EBITDA of only $36.1M against a $127M target — EBITDA component scored 0% but discretionary individual component inflated total payout⚑ Significant related-party transactions involving CEO family members (brother, son, son-in-law) employed by the company raise governance concerns about CEO influence over compensation process⚑ CEO compensation increased year-over-year ($9.2M in 2025 vs $7.8M in 2024) despite materially weaker financial performance

The CEO received $9,206,767 in total compensation for 2025, a year in which the company posted a net loss of $51.4 million and Adjusted EBITDA of only $36.1 million against a budgeted target of $127 million — meaning the primary financial metric used in the bonus plan scored zero percent payout, yet the CEO still received a cash bonus of $2,750,000 (122% of target) due to generous individual performance scores filling the gap. This pay-for-performance disconnect — above-benchmark total pay delivered in a year of significant financial underperformance — is a direct failure of the incentive alignment purpose of variable compensation. Additionally, the proxy discloses multiple related-party transactions in which members of the CEO's immediate family (brother, son, and son-in-law) were employed by or paid by company subsidiaries, raising concerns about the independence of the compensation process and the CEO's influence over the committee.

Auditor Ratification

✓ FOR

Auditor

Grant Thornton LLP

Tenure

N/A

Audit Fees

$1,390,212

Non-Audit Fees

$0

Grant Thornton received $1,390,212 in audit fees and zero dollars in non-audit fees for fiscal year 2025, meaning non-audit fees are 0% of audit fees — well below the 50% threshold that would raise independence concerns; no material restatements are disclosed and the firm is a large national firm appropriate for a company of METC's size; auditor tenure is not explicitly disclosed in the filing so the tenure trigger cannot fire under policy.

Overall Assessment

The 2026 Ramaco Resources annual meeting presents four proposals: all three director nominees pass TSR and governance screens and receive FOR votes; Grant Thornton's ratification is straightforward with zero non-audit fees and receives a FOR vote; however, the Say on Pay vote receives an AGAINST determination due to a meaningful disconnect between above-benchmark executive pay and materially weak 2025 financial results, compounded by governance concerns around extensive CEO family-related transactions. The equity plan amendment to add 4 million shares to the LTIP is not evaluated as equity plan approvals are outside the current policy scope.

Filing date: April 27, 2026·Policy v1.2·high confidence

Compensation Peer Group

12 companies disclosed in 2026 proxy filing

AMRAlpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.
BRYBerry Corporation
CMPCompass Minerals International, Inc.
CNRCore Natural Resources, Inc.
CRDOFCoronado Global Resources Inc.
HNRGHallador Energy Company
BTUPeabody Energy Corporation
PLLPiedmont Lithium Inc.
REIRing Energy, Inc.
SXCSunCoke Energy, Inc.
TALOTalos Energy Inc.
HCCWarrior Met Coal, Inc.