Proxyanalyst LogoProxyanalyst
CompaniesSpecial SituationsExplorerAbout
Terms and Conditions & Privacy PolicySitemap

MASCO CORP (MAS)

Sector: Industrials

ExecutivesDirectorsTrendsAnnual MeetingProxy Filings
    Home/Companies/MAS/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

MASCO CORP · Meeting: May 8, 2026

Policy v1.2high confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

4

Directors AGAINST

0

Say on Pay

FOR

Auditor

FOR

Director Elections

Election of Our Director Nominees

4 FOR
✓ FOR
Gary A. Coombe

Coombe joined the board effective January 1, 2026, making him exempt from the TSR trigger under the 24-month new-director rule, and he brings relevant brand-building and international business expertise with no overboarding or attendance concerns.

✓ FOR
Aine L. Denari

Denari has served since 2022 (within the 24-month exemption window for full TSR trigger purposes), has no overboarding issues, attended all required meetings, and brings relevant technology and operations expertise; the TSR trigger does not fire as MAS outperformed the compensation peer group median over 3 years by +13.8 percentage points, well below the 50-point threshold needed to trigger a vote against.

✓ FOR
Christopher A. O'Herlihy

O'Herlihy has served since 2013 and Masco's 3-year TSR of +40.3% is strong positive, outperforming the compensation peer group median by +13.8 percentage points, far short of the 50-point underperformance threshold required to trigger a vote against; he holds one outside public board seat (Illinois Tool Works) which is within overboarding limits.

✓ FOR
Charles K. Stevens, III

Stevens has served since 2018 and chairs the Audit Committee with clear financial expertise (former GM CFO); Masco's 3-year TSR strongly outperforms the peer group median, so no TSR trigger fires, and he holds two outside public board seats (Genuine Parts and Flex) which is within the non-CEO director limit of four.

All four director nominees receive a FOR vote. Masco's 3-year total shareholder return of +40.3% outperforms the compensation peer group median (+26.5%) by +13.8 percentage points, well below the 50-point underperformance threshold required to trigger votes against any director. The newly joined director (Coombe) is exempt under the 24-month new-director rule. No overboarding, attendance, independence, or qualification concerns were identified for any nominee.

Say on Pay

✓ FOR

CEO

Jonathon J. Nudi

Total Comp

$6,641,952

Prior Support

91%%

CEO total compensation of approximately $6.6 million is reasonable for a large-cap industrial company of Masco's size and reflects a new CEO who only served half the year in 2025 (pro-rated salary of ~$529K vs. a $1.1M annual target); the pay program is heavily weighted toward variable and performance-based pay, including a long-term performance stock award tied to EPS, ROIC, and relative stock performance over three years, plus stock options that only pay out if the stock price rises. The annual cash bonus paid out at only 34% of target due to below-target operating profit and sales results, demonstrating that the incentive structure is working as intended by reducing pay when performance falls short. Prior-year shareholder support was 91%, well above the 70% concern threshold, and no structural red flags such as missing clawback provisions or excessive fixed pay were identified.

Auditor Ratification

✓ FOR

Auditor

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Tenure

N/A

Audit Fees

$7,500,000

Non-Audit Fees

$900,000

Non-audit fees (audit-related fees of $0.4M plus tax fees of $0.5M = $0.9M) represent approximately 12% of audit fees ($7.5M), well below the 50% threshold that would raise independence concerns; PwC is a Big 4 firm appropriate for a company of Masco's size; auditor tenure is not disclosed in the filing so the tenure trigger does not apply; no material restatements were identified.

Stockholder Proposals

1 proposal submitted by shareholders

Proposal 7

Proposal 7 - Give Shareholders an Ability to Call for a Special Shareholder Meeting

✓ FOR
Filed by:Not individually named in the provided filing text (shareholder proponent)OtherGovernance
Board recommends: AGAINST
⚑ governance improvement — company currently prohibits all shareholder-called special meetings⚑ board's own Proposal 6 offers a 25% ownership threshold as a partial response⚑ shareholder proposal seeks 10% threshold which is more shareholder-friendly⚑ no prior-year vote history found

The shareholder proposal asks for the right to call special meetings at a 10% ownership threshold, which is a mainstream governance improvement — Masco's current charter gives shareholders no ability whatsoever to call special meetings, and the right to convene a meeting outside the annual cycle is a fundamental check on board power. While the board has countered with its own Proposal 6 offering a 25% threshold, the 25% bar is quite high (few shareholders individually hold 25%) and the one-year continuous ownership requirement adds further friction, meaning the board's version materially dilutes the right being requested. Supporting the more shareholder-friendly 10% version sends a clear signal that shareholders want meaningful access to this governance tool, not a nominal version of it.

Overall Assessment

Masco's 2026 annual meeting ballot presents a straightforward set of proposals. All four director nominees receive FOR votes, supported by solid 3-year total shareholder return that outperforms the compensation peer group, and the executive pay program earns a FOR on Say on Pay given reasonable CEO pay for a new half-year CEO, meaningful pay reductions tied to below-target 2025 performance, and 91% prior-year shareholder support. The most contested items are the competing special meeting proposals — the shareholder proposal seeking a 10% threshold (Proposal 7, FOR) is more shareholder-friendly than the board's own 25% threshold version (Proposal 6, also FOR as an improvement over the status quo), and PwC ratification passes cleanly with non-audit fees at just 12% of audit fees.

Filing date: April 10, 2026·Policy v1.2·high confidence

Compensation Peer Group

13 companies disclosed in 2026 proxy filing

FBINFortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
ITWIllinois Tool Works Inc.
LEGLeggett & Platt, Incorporated
MHKMohawk Industries, Inc.
NWLNewell Rubbermaid Inc.
OCOwens Corning
PNRPentair plc
SNASnap-on Incorporated
SWKStanley Black & Decker, Inc.
SHWThe Sherwin-Williams Company
TTTrane Technologies plc
WHRWhirlpool Corporation
XYLXylem Inc.