Proxyanalyst LogoProxyanalyst
CompaniesSpecial SituationsExplorerAbout
Terms and Conditions & Privacy PolicySitemap

LIVE OAK BANCSHARES INC (LOB)

Sector: Financials

ExecutivesDirectorsTrendsAnnual MeetingProxy Filings
    Home/Companies/LOB/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

LIVE OAK BANCSHARES INC · Meeting: May 19, 2026

Policy v1.2high confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

10

Directors AGAINST

0

Say on Pay

AGAINST

Auditor

FOR

Director Elections

Election of Directors

10 FOR
✓ FOR
Tonya W. Bradford

Director since 2020 with relevant financial services and marketing experience; all attendance requirements met; 3-year TSR gap of -11.3pp vs. QABA is well below the 65pp trigger threshold for strong positive absolute returns, so no TSR concern applies.

✓ FOR
William H. Cameron

Director since 2013 with extensive banking and real estate finance experience; all attendance requirements met; 3-year TSR gap of -11.3pp vs. QABA is well below the 65pp trigger threshold, so no TSR concern applies.

✓ FOR
David G. Lucht

Director since 2021 (re-appointed) with deep banking credit and risk management experience; all attendance requirements met; 3-year TSR gap of -11.3pp vs. QABA is well below the 65pp trigger threshold, so no TSR concern applies.

✓ FOR
Jeffrey W. Lunsford

Appointed August 2025, less than 24 months ago, so exempt from the TSR performance trigger; brings relevant technology leadership and fintech experience including prior board service at nCino.

✓ FOR
James S. Mahan III

Founder, Chairman and CEO with extensive banking industry experience; 3-year TSR gap of -11.3pp vs. QABA is well below the 65pp trigger threshold for strong positive absolute returns, so no TSR concern applies; Say on Pay vote is evaluated separately.

✓ FOR
Patrick T. McHenry

Appointed May 2025, less than 24 months ago, so exempt from the TSR performance trigger; brings deep financial services regulatory and legislative experience from his tenure as Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee.

✓ FOR
Miltom E. Petty

Director since 2010 with CPA credentials and 45 years as CFO of Carolina Hosiery Mills; serves as audit committee financial expert; 3-year TSR gap of -11.3pp vs. QABA is well below the 65pp trigger threshold, so no TSR concern applies.

✓ FOR
Neil L. Underwood

Cofounder and director since 2008 with deep fintech and banking technology expertise; 3-year TSR gap of -11.3pp vs. QABA is well below the 65pp trigger threshold for strong positive absolute returns, so no TSR concern applies.

✓ FOR
Yousef A. Valine

Director since 2022 with over 40 years of financial services executive experience including risk, operations, and governance; chairs the Audit Committee and is designated as an audit committee financial expert; 3-year TSR gap of -11.3pp vs. QABA is well below the 65pp trigger threshold, so no TSR concern applies.

✓ FOR
William L. Williams III

Cofounder, Vice Chairman, and EVP with over 50 years of corporate and SBA banking experience; 3-year TSR gap of -11.3pp vs. QABA is well below the 65pp trigger threshold for strong positive absolute returns, so no TSR concern applies.

All ten director nominees pass our screening. The company's 3-year stock return of +38.5% is strong positive, and the gap versus the community bank benchmark QABA — First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index of -11.3 percentage points is far below the 65-point threshold required to trigger a vote against any director. Two recently appointed directors (Lunsford, McHenry) are within the 24-month exemption window. No overboarding, attendance, independence, or familial relationship issues were identified for any nominee.

Say on Pay

✗ AGAINST

CEO

James S. Mahan III

Total Comp

$965,432

Prior Support

67.13%%

⚑ Prior Say on Pay support of 67.13% fell below the 70% threshold — company must demonstrate meaningful changes to pass this screen⚑ Equity awards vest purely based on continued employment with no performance conditions — incentive pay is effectively disguised fixed pay⚑ Compensation committee did not use an external compensation consultant or benchmarking for 2025 decisions⚑ CEO aircraft perquisite of $407,168 is very large relative to total CEO cash compensation of $512,565

Last year's Say on Pay vote received only 67.13% support, which is below the 70% threshold in our policy — meaning the company must show meaningful changes to earn a FOR vote this year. While the company conducted an expanded shareholder outreach program and committed to clearer disclosures, the fundamental compensation structure remains unchanged: all equity awards (restricted stock units) granted to executives vest solely based on staying employed for five years, with no performance conditions attached whatsoever, meaning executives receive the same outcome regardless of whether the stock goes up or down. Under our policy, incentive pay that vests regardless of outcomes is effectively fixed compensation dressed up as variable pay, which is a standalone trigger for a NO vote. Additionally, the compensation committee chose not to use any external compensation consultant or industry benchmarking in setting 2025 pay, reducing confidence that pay levels are calibrated to market. These structural concerns, combined with the failure to make substantive changes following below-70% prior-year support, support a vote against.

Auditor Ratification

✓ FOR

Auditor

KPMG LLP

Tenure

N/A

Audit Fees

$2,183,088

Non-Audit Fees

$95,750

Non-audit fees (combining audit-related fees of $60,000 and tax fees of $35,750 totaling $95,750) represent approximately 4.4% of total audit fees paid to KPMG of $2,183,088 in 2025, well below the 50% threshold that would raise independence concerns. KPMG's tenure is not disclosed in the proxy, so the tenure trigger cannot fire under policy. The company's market cap of approximately $1.5 billion warrants a Big 4 auditor, and KPMG is an appropriate choice.

Overall Assessment

Live Oak Bancshares' 2026 annual meeting features ten director nominees, all of whom pass our screening given strong absolute stock performance and a TSR gap well within policy thresholds versus the QABA — First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index community bank benchmark. The primary concern on this ballot is the Say on Pay vote, where a prior-year support level below 70% combined with a persistently time-only equity vesting structure and no external compensation benchmarking drives a vote against executive compensation.

Filing date: April 2, 2026·Policy v1.2·high confidence