LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC (LII)

Sector: Industrials

    Home/Companies/LII/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC · Meeting: May 21, 2026

Policy v1.2high confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

3

Directors AGAINST

0

Say on Pay

FOR

Auditor

FOR

Director Elections

Election of Three Class I Directors for a Three-Year Term Expiring at the 2029 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

3 FOR
✓ FOR
John W. Norris, III

Director since 2001 with no overboarding, no attendance issues, and no independence concerns; LII's 3-year price return of 99.3% is strong positive, and the gap versus the XLI sector ETF fallback is only +18.2pp, well below the 65pp threshold required to trigger an against vote, so the TSR test does not fire.

✓ FOR
Karen H. Quintos

Director since 2014 with one outside public board seat (Cummins Inc.), well within limits; TSR trigger does not apply given the strong 3-year performance gap of +18.2pp versus XLI, far below the 65pp threshold; no independence, attendance, or qualification concerns.

✓ FOR
Shane D. Wall

Director since 2020 with no overboarding, no attendance issues, and no independence concerns; TSR trigger does not apply — the XLI ETF fallback gap is only +18.2pp versus the 65pp strong-positive threshold; brings deep technology and cybersecurity experience relevant to Lennox's strategy.

All three Class I nominees — John W. Norris III, Karen H. Quintos, and Shane D. Wall — pass every policy screen. Lennox's 3-year price return of 99.3% is strongly positive, and the company outperformed the XLI sector ETF by 18.2 percentage points, well below the 65pp threshold needed to trigger a TSR-based against vote. No overboarding, attendance, independence, or qualification concerns were identified for any nominee.

Say on Pay

✓ FOR

CEO

Alok Maskara

Total Comp

$8,434,155

Prior Support

93%%

CEO total compensation of $8.43 million is positioned at or below the median of Lennox's disclosed 15-company peer group (the proxy states CEO target total direct compensation was below peer median), passing the pay level screen. The compensation structure is strongly performance-oriented: a majority of pay is variable, including performance stock awards tied to 3-year ROIC and core net income growth targets, stock appreciation rights, and an annual cash bonus tied to pre-set financial goals — all with meaningful performance conditions. Pay-for-performance alignment is well demonstrated: executives received only about 90% of target on the annual bonus due to below-target cash flow and revenue, while the 3-year performance stock awards paid out at approximately 196% of target consistent with exceptional ROIC results and strong earnings growth over the 2023–2025 period, during which the company delivered a 109% total shareholder return. Prior-year say-on-pay support was 93%, well above the 70% threshold that would require a negative response, and the company has robust governance practices including a clawback policy, anti-hedging and pledging prohibitions, and double-trigger change-in-control provisions.

Auditor Ratification

✓ FOR

Auditor

Ernst & Young LLP

Tenure

1 yrs

Audit Fees

$3,339,000

Non-Audit Fees

$49,000

EY was only engaged in 2025 (its first year as Lennox's auditor following KPMG's dismissal), so tenure concerns do not apply. Non-audit fees paid to EY in 2025 (tax and audit-related fees totaling approximately $49,000) represent roughly 1.5% of EY's audit fees of $3,339,000, far below the 50% threshold that would raise independence concerns. EY is a Big 4 firm appropriate for a company of Lennox's size and complexity, and no material financial restatements were identified.

Overall Assessment

Lennox International's 2026 annual meeting ballot contains three standard proposals — director elections, say-on-pay, and auditor ratification — all of which receive FOR votes under the applicable policy. The company's strong 3-year total shareholder return of 99.3%, well-structured and performance-linked executive pay program, newly engaged Big 4 auditor with minimal non-audit fees, and clean director slate with no overboarding or independence issues result in a straightforward all-FOR ballot.

Filing date: April 8, 2026·Policy v1.2·high confidence