QUAKER HOUGHTON CORP (KWR)

Sector: Materials

    Home/Companies/KWR/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

QUAKER HOUGHTON CORP · Meeting: May 13, 2026

Policy v1.2high confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

1

Directors AGAINST

2

Say on Pay

FOR

Auditor

AGAINST

Director Elections

Election of Directors

1 FOR/2 AGAINST

Against Analysis

✗ AGAINST
Joseph A. Berquist3-year TSR underperformance vs peer group median exceeds policy thresholdCEO serving as director subject to same TSR trigger

Mr. Berquist was appointed to the board on November 18, 2024, which is less than 24 months before the May 2026 meeting, making him technically within the new-director exemption window; however, he is also the sitting CEO and has served in senior leadership roles at Quaker Houghton since 2019, giving him meaningful tenure over the underperformance period. KWR's 3-year total shareholder return is -31.6%, while the company's own disclosed peer group delivered a median of +13.2% over the same period — a gap of -44.8 percentage points, which exceeds the 20-percentage-point threshold that applies when absolute 3-year returns are negative. The 5-year gap versus peers is -45.6 percentage points, confirming this is sustained underperformance rather than a transient dip, so no mitigation applies. As the CEO and the executive most accountable for company performance, a vote against him as a director is warranted.

✗ AGAINST
Charlotte C. Henry3-year TSR underperformance vs peer group median exceeds policy thresholdDirector tenure covers full underperformance period

Ms. Henry has served on the board since 2020, meaning her tenure fully overlaps the 3-year underperformance period. KWR's 3-year total shareholder return is -31.6% versus a peer group median of +13.2%, a gap of -44.8 percentage points that far exceeds the 20-percentage-point policy threshold for companies with negative absolute returns. The 5-year TSR gap versus the same peer group is -45.6 percentage points, confirming persistent underperformance with no 5-year mitigant available. A vote against is warranted for a director with full tenure overlap over this period.

For Analysis

✓ FOR
Nandita Bakhshi

Ms. Bakhshi was appointed to the board on July 31, 2024 — less than 24 months before the meeting — so she is exempt from the stock performance trigger under policy, and she brings relevant financial and senior leadership experience as a former bank CEO.

Two of the three nominees — Mr. Berquist (CEO) and Ms. Henry (director since 2020) — are flagged for a vote against based on KWR's severe and sustained stock underperformance relative to its own disclosed peer group: the company's shares fell 31.6% over three years while peers gained 13.2% on average, a gap of 44.8 percentage points that far exceeds the 20-point policy threshold. Ms. Bakhshi is exempt as a director appointed fewer than 24 months ago and receives a vote in favor.

Say on Pay

✓ FOR

CEO

Joseph A. Berquist

Total Comp

$3,709,451

Prior Support

97%%

CEO total compensation of approximately $3.7 million is modest for a company of this size and market cap, and is well within reasonable benchmarks for a specialty chemicals company with roughly $2 billion in revenue. The pay structure is sound: approximately 79% of CEO target compensation is variable and at-risk, split between an annual cash bonus tied to adjusted EBITDA, new business wins, and safety metrics, and long-term equity awards (performance stock awards and time-based restricted shares) with a 60/40 split favoring performance-based awards. Crucially, pay outcomes reflected the difficult business environment — the annual bonus paid out at only about 58% of target due largely to the company missing its adjusted EBITDA threshold, and the 2023 performance stock awards settled at only 60% of target — so the incentive structure demonstrably reduced executive pay when the company underperformed, which is the behavior this policy looks for in assessing pay-for-performance alignment.

Auditor Ratification

✗ AGAINST

Auditor

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Tenure

54 yrs

Audit Fees

$5,260,000

Non-Audit Fees

$2,495,000

Auditor tenure exceeds 25-year policy threshold (PwC since at least 1972, approximately 54 years)Non-audit fees as percentage of audit fees: 47.4% — within policy threshold but noted

PwC has been Quaker Houghton's auditor since at least 1972 — a relationship of approximately 54 years — which far exceeds the 25-year tenure threshold in our policy. Such a long-standing relationship raises concerns about whether the auditor maintains sufficient independence and professional skepticism when reviewing management's financial reporting. The proxy does not provide a specific and compelling rationale for retaining PwC beyond this threshold, such as a disclosed multi-year rotation plan or exceptional audit quality metrics, so a vote against ratification is warranted on tenure grounds alone. On fees, non-audit fees of approximately $2.495 million (audit-related fees of $1.735 million plus tax fees of $750,000 plus other fees of $10,000) represent about 47% of audit fees of $5.26 million, which is just under the 50% policy threshold and does not independently trigger a no vote.

Overall Assessment

Of the three proposals on the 2026 Quaker Houghton ballot, we vote against two: the auditor (PwC tenure of approximately 54 years far exceeds the 25-year policy threshold) and two of three director nominees (CEO Berquist and long-tenured director Henry, due to KWR's severe and sustained underperformance versus its own disclosed peer group — a negative 31.6% three-year return against a peer median of positive 13.2%). The say-on-pay proposal earns a vote in favor because CEO pay is modestly sized, heavily performance-linked, and actual payouts were reduced when the company missed financial targets.

Filing date: March 31, 2026·Policy v1.2·high confidence

Compensation Peer Group

16 companies disclosed in 2026 proxy filing

ASHAshland Inc.
AVNTAvient Corporation
AXTAAxalta Coating Systems Ltd.
BCPCBalchem Corporation
CBTCabot Corporation
ECVTEcovyst Inc.
ESIElement Solutions Inc
FULH.B. Fuller Company
NGVTIngevity Corporation
IOSPInnospec Inc.
KOPKoppers Holdings Inc.
MTXMinerals Technologies Inc.
NEUNewMarket Corporation
RYAMRayonier Advanced Materials Inc.
SXTSensient Technologies Corporation
SCLStepan Company