JOHN MARSHALL BANCORP INC (JMSB)

Sector: Financials

    Home/Companies/JMSB/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

JOHN MARSHALL BANCORP INC · Meeting: June 16, 2026

Policy v1.2high confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

8

Directors AGAINST

0

Say on Pay

FOR

Auditor

FOR

Director Elections

Election of Eight Directors to Serve Until the 2027 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

8 FOR
✓ FOR
Philip W. Allin

Director since 2006 with relevant business and finance background; all attendance requirements met; TSR underperformance trigger does not apply (JMSB 3-year return of +24.9% vs. QABA benchmark is -43.1pp below, which does not exceed the 65pp threshold required for a strong-positive absolute TSR scenario); no overboarding, independence, or other concerns identified.

✓ FOR
Christopher W. Bergstrom

CEO and director since 2018 with over 43 years of banking experience; TSR underperformance trigger does not apply (gap of -43.1pp vs. QABA does not reach the 65pp threshold for a strong-positive absolute TSR); attendance requirements met; no overboarding or independence concerns.

✓ FOR
Philip R. Chase

Director since 2006 with CFO-level financial expertise supporting audit committee service; TSR trigger does not apply under QABA benchmark; attendance and independence requirements met; no concerns identified.

✓ FOR
Michael T. Foster

Director since 2008 with relevant local business and community experience; TSR trigger does not apply under QABA benchmark; all attendance and independence requirements met; no concerns identified.

✓ FOR
Michael A. Garcia

Director since 2018 with real estate and small business background relevant to the bank's lending markets; TSR trigger does not apply under QABA benchmark; attendance and independence requirements met; no concerns identified.

✓ FOR
Subhash K. Garg

Director since 2008 and CPA with deep accounting expertise supporting his role as Audit Committee Chairman and financial expert; TSR trigger does not apply under QABA benchmark; attendance and independence requirements met; no concerns identified.

✓ FOR
Jonathan C. Kinney

Chairman since 2019 and director since 2008 with extensive legal and community ties; one late Form 4 filing noted but is not a policy trigger; TSR trigger does not apply under QABA benchmark; attendance and independence requirements met; no overboarding concerns identified.

✓ FOR
O. Leland Mahan

Director since 2008 with longstanding legal experience and community banking advisory history; TSR trigger does not apply under QABA benchmark; attendance and independence requirements met; no concerns identified.

All eight director nominees pass the policy screens. The company's 3-year stock return of +24.9% falls in the strong-positive tier, meaning the gap vs. the QABA community bank benchmark (-43.1pp) must exceed 65pp to trigger a negative vote — it does not. All directors met the 75% attendance threshold, no director is overboarded, independence designations appear appropriate, audit committee members have financial expertise, and no familial relationships with senior management are disclosed.

Say on Pay

✓ FOR

CEO

Christopher W. Bergstrom, President & Chief Executive Officer

Total Comp

$1,593,287

Prior Support

N/A

discretionary bonus structure no explicit performance conditions

CEO total compensation of $1,593,287 (salary $800,000, cash bonus $550,000, stock awards $200,017, other $43,270) is within a reasonable range for a CEO at a community bank with approximately $299M market cap in the Northern Virginia market, and does not appear to exceed the +20% individual benchmark threshold. The pay mix is a concern worth noting: the cash bonus is discretionary rather than tied to explicit, pre-set performance targets, which means a portion of what is labeled variable pay functions more like additional fixed pay — however, the proxy does describe a structured peer benchmarking process using 57 comparable banks and 11 measurable performance metrics to set the bonus pool, providing some meaningful governance framework. Employment agreements include clawback provisions for performance-based compensation as required by law. On balance, the compensation program passes the core policy screens, though shareholders should encourage the company to adopt more explicitly performance-conditioned annual incentive targets in future years.

Auditor Ratification

✓ FOR

Auditor

Yount, Hyde & Barbour, P.C.

Tenure

9 yrs

Audit Fees

$222,200

Non-Audit Fees

$25,900

Non-audit fees (audit-related fees of $11,500 plus tax fees of $14,400, totaling $25,900) represent approximately 11.7% of audit fees ($222,200), well below the 50% threshold that would raise independence concerns. YHB has served as auditor of the holding company since 2017 (9 years), below the 25-year tenure trigger. The company has a market cap of approximately $299M, making a regional firm like YHB appropriate. No material restatements were identified. All conditions for a FOR vote are satisfied.

Overall Assessment

The 2026 John Marshall Bancorp annual meeting presents a clean ballot with no significant governance concerns: all eight director nominees pass the TSR, attendance, independence, and overboarding screens; the auditor ratification is straightforward with low non-audit fees and reasonable tenure; and executive compensation, while relying on discretionary rather than formula-based bonuses, is supported by a structured peer benchmarking process and clawback protections. No stockholder proposals appear on the ballot.

Filing date: April 29, 2026·Policy v1.2·high confidence