INGRAM MICRO HOLDING CORP (INGM)

Sector: Information Technology

    Home/Companies/INGM/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

INGRAM MICRO HOLDING CORP · Meeting: May 13, 2026

Policy v1.2high confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

3

Directors AGAINST

1

Say on Pay

FOR

Auditor

AGAINST

Director Elections

Election of Four Directors to Three-Year Terms

3 FOR/1 AGAINST

Against Analysis

✗ AGAINST
Mary Ann SiglerTSR underperformance trigger: 3-year price return +2.5% vs XLK +84.2%, gap of -81.7pp exceeds the 50pp threshold for low-positive absolute TSR; tenure since July 2021 meaningfully overlaps the full underperformance period; 5-year TSR also +2.5% vs XLK, gap still exceeds threshold — no mitigant applies

Sigler has served since July 2021, meaning her tenure fully overlaps the three-year period during which Ingram Micro's stock returned only +2.5% while the XLK technology ETF returned +84.2% — a gap of -81.7 percentage points, well above the 50-point threshold that triggers a no vote for directors overseeing a company with low-positive absolute returns; the 5-year TSR is identical (+2.5%) so the longer-track-record mitigant does not apply, confirming sustained underperformance rather than a temporary trough.

For Analysis

✓ FOR
Bryan Kelln

Kelln joined the board in October 2024, within the 24-month exemption window, so the TSR underperformance trigger does not apply; he has relevant private equity and operational experience and attended all required meetings.

✓ FOR
Sharon Wienbar

Wienbar joined the board in October 2024, within the 24-month exemption window, so the TSR underperformance trigger does not apply; she has relevant technology and public company board experience and serves on the audit committee with appropriate financial background.

✓ FOR
Eric Worley

Worley joined the board in October 2024, within the 24-month exemption window, so the TSR underperformance trigger does not apply; he has relevant financial due diligence and transactional experience.

Of the four Class II nominees, three (Kelln, Wienbar, Worley) joined in October 2024 and are exempt from the TSR trigger under the 24-month new-director rule. Sigler, who has served since July 2021, is subject to the full TSR trigger: Ingram Micro's 3-year stock return of +2.5% trails the XLK technology ETF benchmark by -81.7 percentage points, far exceeding the 50-point threshold applicable when absolute returns are in the low-positive range, and the 5-year record offers no relief. A vote AGAINST Sigler is warranted; the other three nominees receive a FOR.

Say on Pay

✓ FOR

CEO

Paul Bay

Total Comp

$9,665,531

Prior Support

98.79%%

CEO Paul Bay's total reported compensation of $9,665,531 for Fiscal Year 2025 is reasonable for a technology distribution company of Ingram Micro's scale (~$5.8B market cap, revenues between $12.5B and $50B per the proxy), and the proxy discloses that his base salary of $950,000 is actually below the 25th percentile of the peer group — suggesting the pay level is not inflated. The pay structure is well-designed: 65% of the CEO's total target direct compensation is performance-based (annual cash incentive tied to Adjusted EBITDA and Free Cash Flow, plus performance stock awards tied to non-GAAP Net Income, Adjusted ROIC, and Free Cash Flow over a three-year period), comfortably exceeding the 50-60% variable pay threshold; the remaining equity is time-vesting restricted stock units that still require continued service. The company received 98.79% support on Say on Pay at the 2025 annual meeting, maintains both a mandatory Dodd-Frank clawback policy and a broader discretionary clawback policy, and the annual bonus was voluntarily capped at 120% (below the formula result of 122.27%) — all of which reflect sound governance around incentive pay.

Auditor Ratification

✗ AGAINST

Auditor

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Tenure

31 yrs

Audit Fees

$12,465,203

Non-Audit Fees

$2,833,113

Auditor tenure ≥25 years: PwC has served continuously since at least 1994, approximately 31 yearsNon-audit fee ratio: non-audit fees (audit-related $1,272,022 + tax $1,561,091 = $2,833,113) represent approximately 22.7% of audit fees ($12,465,203), which is within the 50% threshold and does not independently trigger a no vote

PwC has audited Ingram Micro continuously since at least 1994 — a tenure of approximately 31 years — which exceeds the 25-year threshold that triggers a no vote under our policy; the proxy does not provide a specific and compelling rationale for continued engagement such as a disclosed multi-year rotation plan or exceptional audit quality metrics that would override this trigger. The non-audit fee ratio of approximately 22.7% is comfortably below the 50% independence threshold and does not raise additional concerns, but the tenure issue alone is sufficient to warrant a vote against ratification.

Overall Assessment

The 2026 Ingram Micro annual meeting presents three proposals: a director election slate of four Class II nominees (one of whom, Mary Ann Sigler, receives an AGAINST vote due to sustained and severe stock underperformance during her tenure since 2021), an auditor ratification for PwC that receives an AGAINST vote solely due to PwC's approximately 31-year tenure exceeding the policy's 25-year independence threshold, and a Say on Pay proposal that receives a FOR vote given a reasonable and well-structured pay program with strong shareholder support in the prior year. No stockholder proposals appear on this ballot.

Filing date: March 26, 2026·Policy v1.2·high confidence