NATIONAL BEVERAGE CORP (FIZZ)

Sector: Consumer Staples

    Home/Companies/FIZZ/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

NATIONAL BEVERAGE CORP · Meeting: October 2, 2026

Policy v1.2high confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

0

Directors AGAINST

1

Say on Pay

AGAINST

Auditor

FOR

Director Elections

Election of Class III Director

/1 AGAINST

Against Analysis

✗ AGAINST
Nick A. Caporella3-year TSR underperformance vs sector ETF fallback (XLP): FIZZ 3-year return -24.8%, absolute TSR is negative, ETF fallback threshold is 30pp; underperformance exceeds trigger5-year TSR mitigant evaluated: 5-year return -9.0% (negative), ETF fallback threshold 30pp — 5-year underperformance vs XLP also likely exceeds threshold, no mitigant appliesFamilial relationship: Nick A. Caporella is parent of Joseph G. Caporella (President and director)Combined Chairman/CEO role with no lead independent directorDirector since 1985 — tenure fully overlaps underperformance period

Nick A. Caporella has served as both Chairman and CEO since 1985 and has a direct familial relationship with President and fellow director Joseph G. Caporella; the stock has lost approximately 24.8% over three years and 9% over five years, both negative absolute returns that exceed the 30-percentage-point underperformance threshold vs. the Consumer Staples ETF (XLP) fallback benchmark, and the five-year track record does not provide the mitigating relief required to downgrade the vote to FOR.

For Analysis

Only one director is up for election this year — Nick A. Caporella as Class III director. A vote AGAINST is warranted due to sustained stock underperformance during his lengthy tenure, his familial relationship with the company's President (his son, who also serves as a director), and the absence of a lead independent director to provide independent board oversight.

Say on Pay

✗ AGAINST

CEO

Nick A. Caporella

Total Comp

$12,013,539

Prior Support

80%%

CEO total compensation of $12,013,539 paid via management fee to a company he wholly owns (CMA), structured as 1% of net sales with no performance conditions — compensation is effectively fixed pay disguised as variable payNo equity awards have ever been granted to the CEOIncentive plan has no meaningful performance conditions for CEO pay — management fee vests regardless of outcomesCompany TSR significantly underperforms peer group: FIZZ TSR $80 vs. peer group (Dow Jones U.S. Soft Drink Index) TSR $145.1 over the disclosed periodPay-for-performance misalignment: above-benchmark CEO pay with significant TSR underperformance vs. disclosed peer groupNo clawback mechanism applicable to management fee structure paid to CMA

The CEO's pay — approximately $12 million — is structured as a flat fee equal to 1% of the company's total sales paid to a company he personally owns, with no performance conditions attached; this means the CEO receives the same fee whether the stock goes up or down, which is effectively fixed pay rather than performance-based pay and fails the policy's requirement that at least 50-60% of senior executive pay be truly variable. The company's stock has dramatically underperformed its own disclosed peer group (the Dow Jones U.S. Soft Drink Index, which returned $145 for every $100 invested while FIZZ returned only $80), yet the CEO's compensation has remained stable and above benchmark levels, representing a clear disconnect between pay and shareholder outcomes. The prior Say on Pay vote in 2023 received 80% support, which clears the 70% threshold, so no prior-vote failure trigger fires — but the structural absence of performance conditions on the dominant compensation element independently requires a vote against.

Auditor Ratification

✓ FOR

Auditor

Grant Thornton LLP

Tenure

2 yrs

Audit Fees

$488,095

Non-Audit Fees

$0

Grant Thornton LLP was engaged as the company's auditor in October 2024, giving it approximately two years of tenure — well below the 25-year threshold that would raise independence concerns. The company paid zero non-audit fees to Grant Thornton during fiscal 2026, meaning there is no non-audit fee ratio concern whatsoever. Grant Thornton is a large national accounting firm that is appropriate for a $3 billion market cap company, and no material restatements have been disclosed.

Overall Assessment

The 2026 National Beverage Corp. annual meeting presents two of three proposals with significant governance concerns: the CEO director election warrants a vote AGAINST due to sustained stock underperformance during his decades-long tenure combined with a familial relationship with the company's President, and the Say on Pay vote warrants a vote AGAINST because the CEO's $12 million compensation is structured as a flat fee with no performance conditions, completely disconnected from shareholder outcomes as evidenced by dramatic underperformance of the company's own disclosed peer group. The auditor ratification is straightforward and warrants a vote FOR, as Grant Thornton is newly engaged with zero non-audit fees.

Filing date: August 28, 2026·Policy v1.2·high confidence