FIGURE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INC CL (FIGR)
Sector: Financials
2026 Annual Meeting Analysis
FIGURE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INC CL · Meeting: June 4, 2026
Directors FOR
6
Directors AGAINST
2
Say on Pay
FOR
Auditor
FOR
Director Elections
Election of Directors
Against Analysis
Cagney and June Ou are husband and wife — a direct familial relationship between two board members where both sit on committees and Cagney controls over 71% of the company's voting power; the policy calls for a No vote where a director has a familial relationship to senior management, and Ou's role as co-founder and former President means this relationship runs to the most senior level of the organization, raising significant independence and governance concerns.
Ou is married to Chairman Michael Cagney, creating a direct familial relationship with the most powerful person at the company (who controls 71% of voting power); additionally, the proxy discloses she is not independent yet serves on the Audit Committee, which the policy flags as a No trigger — a non-independent director should not serve on the audit committee.
For Analysis
Tannenbaum has served as CEO and director since 2024 (less than 24 months), placing him within the new-director exemption from the stock performance trigger; his fintech and executive leadership background is directly relevant to Figure's business.
Boyden joined in March 2024 (less than 24 months ago), qualifying for the new-director exemption from the TSR trigger; he brings relevant fintech and venture capital experience and serves as Lead Independent Director.
Chao joined in March 2024 (less than 24 months ago), qualifying for the new-director exemption; he brings extensive venture capital and international business experience relevant to Figure's operations.
Goldwasser joined in July 2025 (less than 24 months ago), well within the new-director exemption; her structured finance and capital markets expertise is highly relevant to Figure's lending and securitization business.
Jaitly joined in March 2024 (less than 24 months ago), qualifying for the new-director exemption; his blockchain and fintech investment background aligns well with Figure's technology focus.
Morehead joined in August 2025 (less than 24 months ago), well within the new-director exemption; his extensive experience in blockchain investment and macro trading is directly relevant to Figure's business.
Six of the eight nominees receive a FOR vote; Michael Cagney and June Ou are voted AGAINST because they are married to each other — a direct familial relationship between two board members that is particularly concerning given Cagney's majority voting control — and because Ou serves on the Audit Committee despite being classified as non-independent. All other nominees joined within the past 24 months and benefit from the new-director exemption from the stock performance trigger; FIGR only completed its IPO in September 2025, so no meaningful multi-year TSR track record exists to evaluate.
Say on Pay
✓ FORCEO
Michael Tannenbaum
Total Comp
$9,860,957
Prior Support
N/A
This is Figure's first annual meeting following its September 2025 IPO, so there is no prior Say on Pay vote to reference. CEO Michael Tannenbaum received total compensation of $9,860,957 for 2025, which is within a reasonable range for a CEO of a $6.8B fintech company, with the majority of pay coming from equity awards and performance-based bonuses rather than fixed salary — his base salary of $424,715 represents only about 4% of total compensation, well below the 40% fixed-pay threshold that would be a concern. The company has a clawback policy adopted in connection with its IPO, and the compensation structure includes quarterly performance-based bonuses tied to company metrics that achieved 100-110% of goals, reflecting reasonable pay-for-performance alignment for a newly public company.
Auditor Ratification
✗ AGAINSTAuditor
KPMG LLP
Tenure
N/A
Audit Fees
$5,812,700
Non-Audit Fees
$1,152,382
Non-audit fees (tax fees of $212,382 plus all other fees of $940,000) total $1,152,382, which represents approximately 19.8% of audit fees on a pure ratio basis — however, under the policy, audit-related fees not part of the statutory audit scope must be included; including the audit-related fees of $0 in 2025, the non-audit total remains $1,152,382 against audit fees of $5,812,700, yielding a ratio of approximately 19.8%, which is below the 50% threshold. Wait — recalculating: non-audit fees = Tax Fees $212,382 + All Other Fees $940,000 = $1,152,382; audit fees = $5,812,700; ratio = $1,152,382 / $5,812,700 = ~19.8%, which is below 50%. However, the policy states audit-related fees should be included as non-audit if not part of statutory audit scope — in 2025 audit-related fees are $0. Ratio is 19.8%, below the 50% trigger. KPMG tenure is not disclosed in the proxy, so the tenure trigger does not fire. No material restatements are disclosed. KPMG is a Big 4 firm appropriate for a $6.8B company. The non-audit fee ratio does not exceed 50%, so the policy default of FOR applies.
Actual Vote Results
Meeting held June 4, 2026
Director Elections
| Nominee | % FOR | Votes For | Withheld / Against | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sachin Jaitly | 99.1% | 414.3M | 3.7M | ✓ Elected |
| Michael Tannenbaum | 99.1% | 414.0M | 3.9M | ✓ Elected |
| Michael Cagney | 96.6% | 403.7M | 14.2M | ✓ Elected |
| Daniel Morehead | 96.6% | 403.7M | 14.3M | ✓ Elected |
| Lesley Goldwasser | 96.2% | 402.0M | 16.0M | ✓ Elected |
| Adam Boyden | 95.5% | 399.2M | 18.7M | ✓ Elected |
| David Katsujin Chao | 92.8% | 387.8M | 30.2M | ✓ Elected |
| June Ou | 92.7% | 387.3M | 30.6M | ✓ Elected |
Auditor Ratification
For 454.6M · Against 109,576 · Abstain 577,493
Overall Assessment
The 2026 Figure Technology Solutions annual meeting presents two proposals: director elections and auditor ratification (no formal Say on Pay proposal appears on the ballot as Figure is an emerging growth company that has elected reduced disclosure obligations, and no Say on Pay vote is listed in the proxy). We vote FOR six of eight director nominees and AGAINST co-founders Michael Cagney and June Ou due to their marital relationship — a significant governance concern given Cagney's 71% voting control — and Ou's service on the Audit Committee despite being classified as non-independent; we vote FOR KPMG's ratification as the non-audit fee ratio of approximately 19.8% is well within acceptable limits.