ENPHASE ENERGY INC (ENPH)

Sector: Information Technology

    Home/Companies/ENPH/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

ENPHASE ENERGY INC · Meeting: May 13, 2026

Policy v1.2high confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

0

Directors AGAINST

3

Say on Pay

FOR

Auditor

FOR

Director Elections

Election of Class II Director Nominees

/3 AGAINST

Against Analysis

✗ AGAINST
Jamie HaenggiTSR underperformance trigger: ENPH 3-year price return -82.9% vs XLK +84.2%, gap of -167.1pp exceeds 30pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; 5-year return -76.6% vs XLK — gap also exceeds threshold, no 5-year mitigant available; director joined August 2020, tenure exceeds 24 months

Ms. Haenggi has served since August 2020, giving her full tenure overlap with the severe stock underperformance period; Enphase's 3-year price return of -82.9% trails the XLK technology ETF by approximately 167 percentage points, far exceeding the 30-percentage-point trigger threshold for companies with negative absolute returns, and the 5-year record (-76.6% vs XLK's strong gain) does not provide a mitigating longer-term track record, so a vote against is warranted.

✗ AGAINST
Benjamin KortlangTSR underperformance trigger: ENPH 3-year price return -82.9% vs XLK +84.2%, gap of -167.1pp exceeds 30pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; 5-year return -76.6% vs XLK — gap also exceeds threshold, no 5-year mitigant available; director joined May 2010, long tenure fully overlaps underperformance period

Mr. Kortlang has served since 2010 and bears full accountability for the performance period; Enphase's 3-year price return of -82.9% trails the XLK technology ETF by approximately 167 percentage points, far exceeding the 30-percentage-point trigger threshold, and the 5-year return equally fails to provide relief, so a vote against is warranted.

✗ AGAINST
Richard MoraTSR underperformance trigger: ENPH 3-year price return -82.9% vs XLK +84.2%, gap of -167.1pp exceeds 30pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; 5-year return -76.6% vs XLK — gap also exceeds threshold, no 5-year mitigant available; director joined February 2014, long tenure fully overlaps underperformance period

Mr. Mora has served since 2014 and bears full accountability for the performance period; Enphase's 3-year price return of -82.9% trails the XLK technology ETF by approximately 167 percentage points, far exceeding the 30-percentage-point trigger threshold, and the 5-year record provides no mitigating relief, so a vote against is warranted.

For Analysis

All three Class II nominees are recommended AGAINST. The company's stock has lost approximately 83% over three years while the technology sector ETF (XLK) gained roughly 84%, a gap of about 167 percentage points that dwarfs the 30-percentage-point threshold required to trigger a vote against under the policy for companies with negative absolute returns. The 5-year record is equally poor (-76.6% for ENPH), so the 5-year mitigant does not apply. Each of the three nominees has served long enough to be fully accountable for this underperformance period.

Say on Pay

✓ FOR

CEO

Badrinarayanan Kothandaraman

Total Comp

$9,601,958

Prior Support

85.4%%

The CEO's total reported compensation of approximately $9.6 million is meaningfully lower than prior years (down roughly 24% from 2024 and 51% from 2023), reflecting the committee's deliberate reductions in equity grant size in response to business conditions. Pay mix is strong — 68% of target pay is at risk through performance-based equity awards and quarterly cash bonuses tied to measurable goals, well above the 50-60% minimum the policy looks for. While the stock has severely underperformed, the incentive structure is genuinely working as designed: the 2023-2025 relative TSR performance awards were forfeited in their entirety because Enphase finished below the 25th percentile of the S&P 500, demonstrating that variable pay is not being earned in the absence of shareholder returns. Prior say-on-pay support was 85.4%, above the 70% concern threshold, and the program includes a robust clawback policy, double-trigger change-in-control provisions, and no excessive perquisites.

Auditor Ratification

✓ FOR

Auditor

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Tenure

16 yrs

Audit Fees

$2,830,000

Non-Audit Fees

$272,000

Deloitte's non-audit fees (tax services of $272,000) represent approximately 9.6% of audit fees ($2,830,000), well below the 50% threshold that would raise independence concerns; auditor tenure of approximately 16 years (since 2010) is below the 25-year threshold that would trigger a negative vote; and Deloitte is a Big 4 firm appropriate for a company of Enphase's size and complexity.

Overall Assessment

The 2026 Enphase annual meeting ballot presents a mixed picture: the say-on-pay and auditor proposals pass the policy screens and receive FOR votes, but all three director nominees up for election are recommended AGAINST because the company's stock has fallen approximately 83% over three years while the technology sector (XLK) rose 84%, a catastrophic gap of roughly 167 percentage points that far exceeds the policy's trigger threshold regardless of the 5-year check. The equity plan increase proposal is outside the scope of the current policy and is noted but not voted.

Filing date: April 1, 2026·Policy v1.2·high confidence