DOCUSIGN INC (DOCU)

Sector: Information Technology

    Home/Companies/DOCU/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

DOCUSIGN INC · Meeting: June 1, 2026

Policy v1.2high confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

3

Directors AGAINST

0

Say on Pay

FOR

Auditor

FOR

Director Elections

Election of Directors: James Beer, Cain A. Hayes, and Allan Thygesen to the Board of Directors

3 FOR
✓ FOR
James Beer

Beer joined the board in August 2020 and his tenure overlaps the underperformance period, but Docusign's 3-year return of -15.5% is only 5.2 percentage points below the compensation peer group median of -10.3%, well within the 20-percentage-point trigger threshold for companies with negative absolute 3-year returns, so no TSR trigger fires; he has no overboarding, attendance, or independence issues, and brings strong CFO and technology-sector experience as Board Chair.

✓ FOR
Cain A. Hayes

Hayes joined in December 2020 and his tenure overlaps the underperformance period, but the 3-year peer-group gap of -5.2 percentage points does not breach the 20-percentage-point trigger threshold; prior low vote in 2023 was attributed by shareholders to compensation committee concerns rather than his personal qualifications, and the company has since made significant governance and compensation reforms; no overboarding or attendance issues are disclosed.

✓ FOR
Allan Thygesen

Thygesen joined as CEO and director in October 2022, and while his tenure covers most of the 3-year measurement window, the 3-year peer-group gap of -5.2 percentage points does not exceed the 20-percentage-point trigger threshold required for a negative-absolute-TSR company; as an executive director he is subject to the same TSR test as other directors, but the test does not fire, and he holds no disqualifying outside board seats beyond one public company board (A.P. Moller-Maersk).

All three nominees — James Beer (Board Chair), Cain A. Hayes, and CEO Allan Thygesen — receive a FOR vote. Docusign's 3-year stock return of -15.5% underperforms the sector technology ETF (XLK) by a wide margin, but the primary benchmark under policy is the company-disclosed compensation peer group, where the gap is only -5.2 percentage points, well below the 20-percentage-point trigger for companies with negative absolute 3-year returns. No director has overboarding, attendance, independence, or qualification concerns that would warrant a vote against.

Say on Pay

✓ FOR

CEO

Allan Thygesen

Total Comp

$26,039,579

Prior Support

57%%

The prior-year Say on Pay vote received approximately 57% support, which is above the 70% threshold that would automatically require a 'No' vote for lack of engagement, and the company has made meaningful, concrete changes in direct response to shareholder feedback — including extending performance stock award measurement periods from one to two years (with a commitment to three years for FY27), increasing the target percentile for relative total-return stock awards, and maintaining flat CEO pay. The CEO's total reported compensation of approximately $26 million is high in absolute terms, but roughly 96% is variable or performance-based equity, the pay mix requirement is clearly satisfied, and the company's compensation peer group — which includes similarly-sized software companies — supports this range; no individual NEO appears to breach the policy's pay-level thresholds after accounting for the heavily equity-weighted structure. While Docusign's stock has significantly underperformed the broad technology sector, it has only modestly underperformed its compensation peer group over three years (-5.2 percentage points), and the performance stock awards that drive the majority of executive pay include rigorous, multi-year financial and relative total-return conditions, so incentive pay is not considered misaligned with shareholder experience.

Auditor Ratification

✓ FOR

Auditor

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Tenure

N/A

Audit Fees

$3,833,247

Non-Audit Fees

$1,276,938

Non-audit fees (audit-related fees of $365,000 plus tax fees of $909,938 plus other fees of $2,000 = $1,276,938) represent approximately 33% of audit fees ($3,833,247), which is well below the 50% threshold that would raise independence concerns; PwC is a Big 4 firm fully appropriate for a $9 billion market-cap technology company; auditor tenure is not disclosed in the filing so the tenure trigger cannot fire under policy; no material restatements are noted.

Stockholder Proposals

1 proposal submitted by shareholders

Proposal 5

Stockholder Proposal to Report on Risks of Non-Fiduciary Executive Compensation Metrics

✗ AGAINST
Filed by:Not explicitly named in the filing excerpt (proponent identity not disclosed in the provided text)Ideological — ConservativeDisclosure
Board recommends: AGAINST
ideological conservative filerproposal targets ESG and DEI metrics from political motivation

The proposal's framing and supporting arguments — citing a conservative think-tank report (1792 Exchange), characterizing ESG and DEI metrics as 'ideologically divisive' and 'legally risky,' and referencing sources selected to oppose ESG-linked pay — are hallmarks of an ideologically motivated conservative filer rather than a neutral fiduciary investor concerned with shareholder value. Under our policy, proposals submitted to advance political or ideological goals from either direction are disqualified from support regardless of how they are framed. Even evaluated on the merits, the company has already removed the ESG modifier from its FY2026 compensation program and retains only small operational metrics (supply chain emissions and employee experience, each weighted at 5%) that it credibly links to cost efficiency and customer demand, making a special report redundant and unlikely to add new investor insight.

Overall Assessment

Docusign's 2026 annual meeting ballot is relatively straightforward: all three director nominees receive a FOR vote because the company's stock underperformance versus its disclosed peer group falls well short of the policy trigger threshold, and meaningful governance reforms are underway including a planned board declassification; Say on Pay receives a FOR vote given the high proportion of performance-based pay, concrete compensation improvements made in response to shareholder feedback, and only modest peer-group underperformance. The ideologically framed stockholder proposal to report on ESG and DEI compensation risks is voted AGAINST because it originates from a conservative advocacy perspective rather than a neutral fiduciary concern, and the company has already addressed the core issue by removing the ESG modifier from its current compensation program.

Filing date: April 16, 2026·Policy v1.2·high confidence

Compensation Peer Group

6 companies disclosed in 2026 proxy filing

HUBSHubSpot
INFAInformatica
PAYCPaycom Software
RNGRingCentral
UUnity Software
VEEVVeeva Systems