DROPBOX INC CLASS A (DBX)

Sector: Information Technology

    Home/Companies/DBX/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

DROPBOX INC CLASS A · Meeting: May 21, 2026

Policy v1.2high confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

7

Directors AGAINST

0

Say on Pay

FOR

Auditor

FOR

Director Elections

Election of Directors

7 FOR
✓ FOR
Andrew W. Houston

As co-founder and CEO with a director tenure since 2007, Houston's 3-year TSR of +7.4% outperforms the company-disclosed peer group median of -8.9% by +16.3pp, well below the 35pp trigger threshold for low-positive TSR, so no TSR-based concern applies; no overboarding, attendance, or independence issues identified.

✓ FOR
Lisa Campbell

Campbell has served since 2019 and the company's 3-year TSR outperforms the peer group median by +16.3pp, below the 35pp trigger threshold; no overboarding (three public boards is within the four-board limit), attendance is adequate, and she serves appropriately on the audit committee as an independent director.

✓ FOR
Warren Jenson

Jenson joined the board in January 2025, which is within the 24-month new-director exemption window, so the TSR trigger does not apply to him; he brings strong financial expertise as audit committee chair and former CFO of multiple public companies.

✓ FOR
Andrew Moore

Moore joined in December 2023, which is within the 24-month new-director exemption window, so the TSR trigger does not apply; his AI and engineering expertise is directly relevant to Dropbox's strategic direction.

✓ FOR
Abhay Parasnis

Parasnis has served since March 2022 and the company's 3-year TSR of +7.4% outperforms the peer group median by +16.3pp, well below the 35pp trigger threshold; no overboarding or attendance concerns identified.

✓ FOR
Karen Peacock

Peacock has served since 2019 and the company's 3-year TSR outperforms the peer group median by +16.3pp; the proxy notes she met with management and directors between meetings in lieu of formal meeting attendance, which the company treats as satisfying the 75% threshold, and she holds two public board seats, within the four-board limit.

✓ FOR
Michael Seibel

Seibel has served since December 2020 and the company's 3-year TSR outperforms the peer group median by +16.3pp, below the 35pp trigger threshold; no overboarding or attendance concerns identified.

All seven nominees pass the TSR trigger test: DBX's 3-year return of +7.4% beats the company-disclosed peer group median of -8.9% by +16.3pp, which is below the 35pp underperformance threshold applicable to low-positive TSR companies. Two newer directors (Jenson, Moore) are within the 24-month exemption window in any case. No overboarding, independence, attendance, or qualification concerns were identified for any nominee.

Say on Pay

✓ FOR

CEO

Andrew W. Houston

Total Comp

$2,166,622

Prior Support

98.8%%

CEO Andrew Houston's total reported compensation of $2,166,622 is notably modest for a technology CEO at a $5.7 billion company, reflecting his decision not to receive annual equity grants given his significant co-founder ownership stake and the pre-existing Co-Founder Grant from 2017; this pay level is well within benchmark expectations for a mid-cap technology CEO. The broader executive pay program is heavily variable — approximately 96% of non-CEO named executive officer pay is at-risk through annual cash bonuses and stock awards — and the 2025 bonus payouts were tied to revenue and operating margin targets that the company substantially achieved (101% of revenue target, operating margin above target), demonstrating meaningful pay-for-performance alignment. The prior-year Say on Pay vote received 98.8% support, there are no structural concerns with the incentive design, and the company maintains a Nasdaq-compliant clawback policy.

Auditor Ratification

✓ FOR

Auditor

Ernst & Young LLP

Tenure

13 yrs

Audit Fees

$3,843,000

Non-Audit Fees

$1,374,000

Ernst & Young has served as Dropbox's auditor since 2013, giving it approximately 13 years of tenure — well below the 25-year threshold that would trigger a concern. Non-audit fees (audit-related fees of $1,318,000 plus tax fees of $49,000 plus other fees of $7,000 = $1,374,000) represent approximately 36% of core audit fees of $3,843,000, which is below the 50% threshold, so no independence concern arises from the fee mix. Ernst & Young is a Big 4 firm appropriate for a company of Dropbox's size and complexity, and no material restatements were disclosed.

Stockholder Proposals

1 proposal submitted by shareholders

Proposal 4

Proposal to Approve an Amendment and Restatement of Our Articles (Jury Trial Waiver)

✓ FOR
Filed by:Board of Directors (Dropbox, Inc.)OtherCharter Amendment
Board recommends: FOR
board-proposed charter amendmentlimited jury trial waiver for internal corporate actions onlyNevada reincorporation contextmirrors prior Delaware Chancery Court non-jury practice

This is a board-proposed amendment to Dropbox's articles of incorporation, not a third-party stockholder proposal, and should be evaluated as a charter amendment under the governance framework. The proposal adds a limited jury trial waiver covering only 'internal actions' such as fiduciary duty claims and derivative suits — it does not waive jury rights for ordinary commercial or employment disputes. Dropbox reincorporated in Nevada from Delaware in March 2025, and this change restores the functional equivalent of the non-jury Chancery Court environment that previously governed internal disputes, reducing litigation unpredictability for shareholders without materially restricting shareholder rights beyond the prior Delaware baseline. The amendment is narrow in scope, analogous to a widely-used governance provision, and the baseline comparison supports this as a neutral-to-positive governance change.

Overall Assessment

The 2026 Dropbox annual meeting ballot is straightforward: all seven director nominees pass the TSR trigger test given the company's outperformance of its disclosed peer group over three years, Ernst & Young's reappointment clears all auditor independence screens, and CEO pay is unusually modest relative to peers with strong variable-pay alignment for other executives supported by a 98.8% prior-year shareholder vote. The only non-standard item is a board-proposed jury trial waiver charter amendment, which is a narrow governance change that mirrors Dropbox's prior Delaware practice and does not materially restrict shareholder rights.

Filing date: April 7, 2026·Policy v1.2·high confidence

Compensation Peer Group

19 companies disclosed in 2026 proxy filing

APPAppLovin
BOXBox
DOCUDocuSign
DLBDolby Laboratories
ESTCElastic
ETSYEtsy
GDDYGoDaddy
HUBSHubSpot
INFAInformatica
NTNXNutanix
OKTAOkta
PAYCPaycom Software
PINSPinterest
PSTGPure Storage
RNGRingCentral
ROKURoku
TDCTeradata
ZMZoom Communications