CARVANA CLASS A (CVNA)
Sector: Consumer Discretionary
2026 Annual Meeting Analysis
CARVANA CLASS A · Meeting: May 5, 2026
Directors FOR
2
Directors AGAINST
0
Say on Pay
FOR
Auditor
AGAINST
Director Elections
Election of Directors Michael Maroone and Neha Parikh as Class III Directors
Carvana's 3-year stock return of 3,791% massively exceeds the XLY sector ETF's 59.6% return by over 3,731 percentage points, far above the 65-percentage-point trigger threshold for strong positive TSR, so no TSR underperformance concern applies; Maroone has deep automotive retail expertise as former President and COO of AutoNation, serves as Lead Director, attends 100% of meetings, and no overboarding, independence, or attendance issues are present.
The same strong TSR outperformance applies — Carvana's 3-year return of 3,791% versus XLY's 59.6% is more than 3,731 percentage points above benchmark, well clear of any trigger threshold; Parikh brings relevant consumer technology and e-commerce expertise from Uber, Waze, and Expedia, attends 100% of meetings, and no overboarding, independence, or attendance concerns exist.
Both director nominees pass all policy screens: Carvana's extraordinary 3-year stock outperformance of over 3,731 percentage points versus the XLY consumer discretionary ETF eliminates any TSR underperformance concern, and neither director has overboarding, attendance, independence, or qualification issues.
Say on Pay
✓ FORCEO
Ernest C. Garcia, III
Total Comp
$8,382,555
Prior Support
99.5%%
CEO total compensation of approximately $8.4 million is notably below market for the CEO of a $67.6 billion market-cap consumer technology company — the proxy itself discloses that the CEO has requested his compensation be set significantly below market median given his substantial ownership stake, and roughly 88% of pay is delivered in at-risk, time-based equity directly tied to stock price performance. Pay-for-performance alignment is strong: Carvana's stock returned approximately 3,791% over three years versus 59.6% for the XLY sector ETF, and the company delivered record net income of $1.9 billion and Adjusted EBITDA of $2.2 billion in 2025. The company has a meaningful clawback policy adopted in compliance with SEC and NYSE rules, received over 99.5% shareholder support on its last say-on-pay vote, and shows no pay mix, dilution, or performance metric concerns that would warrant a no vote.
Auditor Ratification
✗ AGAINSTAuditor
Grant Thornton LLP
Tenure
N/A
Audit Fees
$2,522,398
Non-Audit Fees
$1,361,790
The non-audit fees paid to Grant Thornton in 2025 — which include $134,380 in audit-related fees, $1,153,210 in tax fees, and $74,200 in other agreed-upon procedure fees, totaling approximately $1,361,790 — represent about 54% of the core audit fees of $2,522,398, which exceeds the 50% threshold under our policy; a non-audit fee relationship this large relative to the audit itself raises independence concerns, as the auditor's financial relationship with management extends well beyond its core oversight role. Grant Thornton is an appropriate-sized firm for Carvana, and no material restatements are noted, but the non-audit fee ratio alone triggers a no vote under policy.
Stockholder Proposals
1 proposal submitted by shareholders
Proposal 6
Stockholder Proposal: Independent Board Chairman
John Chevedden is a well-recognized individual governance activist with a strong track record of submitting legitimate shareholder rights proposals, and this proposal — requiring an independent board chairperson separate from the CEO — is a mainstream governance improvement that broadly aligns with shareholder interests by creating independent oversight of management. Carvana is a controlled company where Ernest Garcia III serves simultaneously as CEO, Chairman, and a controlling shareholder, a structure that concentrates significant authority in one person with limited checks from independent board leadership; while the company points to its Lead Director as an adequate substitute, a Lead Director role is inherently weaker than a fully independent chairperson because the Lead Director's powers depend on access granted by the combined CEO-Chairman. Although there is no prior-year vote history to amplify urgency, the governance concern is real and material for an ordinary shareholder, and the proposal's ask — separating the chairman and CEO roles over time — is a reasonable structural safeguard.
Overall Assessment
The 2026 Carvana annual meeting ballot presents six items: both director nominees receive FOR votes on the strength of extraordinary stock outperformance and sound qualifications; the say-on-pay vote receives a FOR given below-market CEO pay, strong pay-for-performance alignment, and a near-unanimous prior-year shareholder endorsement; auditor ratification receives an AGAINST because non-audit fees exceed 50% of audit fees, triggering an independence concern under policy; and the independent board chairman stockholder proposal from credible activist John Chevedden receives a FOR given the meaningful governance concern created by a combined CEO-Chairman role at a controlled company with no prior independent chair structure.