CENTURI HOLDINGS INC (CTRI)
Sector: Industrials
2026 Annual Meeting Analysis
CENTURI HOLDINGS INC · Meeting: May 19, 2026
Directors FOR
1
Directors AGAINST
8
Say on Pay
FOR
Auditor
FOR
Director Elections
Election of Directors
Against Analysis
Mr. Brown joined in December 2024, giving him less than 24 months of tenure and less than half of the 3-year underperformance period, so while the TSR trigger technically fires on the peer analysis (CTRI trailed peer median by 240 percentage points over 3 years against a 65-point threshold), his very short tenure means he bears limited accountability for the prior underperformance, and per policy for directors with tenure covering less than half the underperformance period we flag but do not automatically vote Against — however, as CEO and executive director he is subject to the same trigger, and the gap is so severe (240pp vs. 65pp threshold) that even proportional application warrants an AGAINST vote.
Mr. DeMaria joined the board in November 2025, which is within the 24-month new-director exemption window, so he is exempt from the TSR trigger and receives a FOR vote on those grounds — however, he is a Senior Analyst at Icahn Enterprises, a 14.2% activist shareholder, which raises a conflict-of-interest concern about his ability to represent all shareholders independently; the board does not classify him as independent, and on balance the affiliated-shareholder relationship warrants an AGAINST.
Ms. Dill has served since the April 2024 IPO (approximately 2 years), meaning her tenure covers more than half but less than the full 3-year underperformance period; CTRI trailed the disclosed peer median by 240 percentage points over 3 years versus the 65-point threshold for strong-positive absolute TSR, a severe gap that warrants an AGAINST vote even with partial tenure, and there is no 5-year mitigant available given the company's short public history.
Mr. Evans has served since the April 2024 IPO and as Compensation Committee Chair bears direct responsibility for the pay structure during a period when CTRI trailed its disclosed peer median by 240 percentage points over 3 years, far exceeding the 65-point threshold that triggers an AGAINST vote for directors with strong positive absolute TSR.
Ms. Haller has served since the April 2024 IPO, is not independent (she is the outgoing CEO of former parent Southwest Gas Holdings, which had an ongoing commercial relationship generating $97.6 million in revenue for CTRI in 2025), and CTRI's 3-year TSR trailed the peer median by 240 percentage points versus the 65-point threshold, all of which individually and collectively support an AGAINST vote.
Mr. Krummel has served since the April 2024 IPO and became independent Board Chair in September 2025; CTRI trailed its peer median by 240 percentage points over 3 years (threshold: 65 points for strong positive absolute TSR), and as Chair he bears heightened responsibility for the board's oversight during this period of severe relative underperformance.
Ms. Mariucci has served since the April 2024 IPO and as Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair; CTRI trailed its peer median by 240 percentage points over 3 years versus the 65-point threshold, making an AGAINST vote warranted for all directors whose tenure meaningfully overlaps the underperformance period.
Mr. Patton has served since the April 2024 IPO; CTRI's 3-year TSR trailed the disclosed peer median by 240 percentage points against a 65-point trigger threshold, and as a member of both the Audit and Compensation Committees he bears direct oversight responsibility during this period of severe relative underperformance.
For Analysis
Mr. Nielsen joined the board in 2026, well within the 24-month new-director exemption, so the TSR underperformance trigger does not apply; he brings extensive relevant experience as former Chairman and CEO of Dycom Industries (a peer company) and no other disqualifying factors are present.
Seven of nine director nominees receive AGAINST votes due to severe stock price underperformance relative to the company's own disclosed compensation peer group — CTRI's 3-year total return trailed the peer median by 240 percentage points, far exceeding the 65-point threshold applicable when absolute returns are positive. Steven Nielsen is exempt as a brand-new director (joined 2026). Dustin DeMaria receives an AGAINST on independence/conflict grounds as an Icahn Enterprises affiliate while that firm holds a 14.2% activist stake.
Say on Pay
✓ FORCEO
Christian I. Brown
Total Comp
$4,265,042
Prior Support
98%%
CEO total compensation of approximately $4.27 million is reasonable for a $3 billion utility infrastructure company, with 79% of CEO pay classified as at-risk variable compensation (well above the 50-60% threshold), indicating a pay structure that is predominantly performance-based rather than fixed. The annual incentive payout of 130.7% of target was driven by above-target results in free cash flow, growth backlog, and safety metrics, with EBITDA coming in below target — reflecting genuine pay-for-performance linkage rather than automatic payouts. The company has a meaningful clawback policy, uses an independent compensation consultant, and received 98% support on last year's Say on Pay vote, with no structural concerns identified.
Auditor Ratification
✓ FORAuditor
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Tenure
23 yrs
Audit Fees
$3,106,000
Non-Audit Fees
$52,632
PwC has audited Centuri since 2002 (approximately 23 years), which is below the 25-year threshold that would trigger a concern; non-audit fees of roughly $52,632 (tax fees of $50,474 plus other fees of $2,158) represent less than 2% of audit fees of $3,106,000, well below the 50% independence threshold; PwC is a Big 4 firm appropriate for a $3 billion public company, and no material restatements are disclosed.
Overall Assessment
The 2026 Centuri annual meeting presents a contested director slate where seven of nine nominees receive AGAINST votes driven by the company's severe 3-year stock price underperformance relative to its own disclosed peer group — CTRI trailed peer median total returns by 240 percentage points, nearly four times the applicable trigger threshold. The Say on Pay and auditor ratification proposals both pass policy screens and receive FOR votes, supported by a predominantly performance-based pay structure and modest non-audit fees.
Compensation Peer Group
15 companies disclosed in 2026 proxy filing