Proxyanalyst LogoProxyanalyst
CompaniesSpecial SituationsExplorerAbout
Terms and Conditions & Privacy PolicySitemap

CUSTOM TRUCK ONE SOURCE INC (CTOS)

Sector: Industrials

ExecutivesDirectorsTrendsAnnual MeetingProxy Filings
    Home/Companies/CTOS/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

CUSTOM TRUCK ONE SOURCE INC · Meeting: June 11, 2026

Policy v1.2high confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

3

Directors AGAINST

0

Say on Pay

FOR

Auditor

AGAINST

Director Elections

Election of Class A Directors

3 FOR
✓ FOR
Paul Bader

Bader has served since 2021, the 3-year TSR gap versus the company-disclosed peer group median is only +2.5pp in CTOS's favor (well below the 65pp threshold that would trigger a vote against), he has no attendance issues, he chairs the audit committee and is a designated financial expert with deep accounting credentials, and no other policy flags apply.

✓ FOR
Mark D. Ein

Ein has served since 2019, the 3-year TSR gap versus the peer group median is +2.5pp in CTOS's favor (far below the 65pp trigger threshold), he shows no attendance issues, and his background as a long-tenured entrepreneur and investor is relevant to the company's stage and industry; no other policy flags apply.

✓ FOR
David Glatt

Glatt has served since 2021 as a Platinum Equity Managing Director with direct oversight of portfolio company operations including prior responsibility for Nesco (CTOS's predecessor), the 3-year TSR gap versus the peer group median is +2.5pp in CTOS's favor (well below the 65pp trigger threshold), and no other policy flags apply.

All three Class A nominees — Bader, Ein, and Glatt — pass every policy screen. CTOS's 3-year price return of +44.7% is strong positive, and the company's relative performance versus its 15-company disclosed compensation peer group shows CTOS outperforming the peer median by +2.5pp over three years, far below the 65pp underperformance threshold required to trigger a vote against any director. No overboarding, attendance, independence, or qualifications concerns are identified for any nominee.

Say on Pay

✓ FOR

CEO

Ryan McMonagle

Total Comp

$2,577,511

Prior Support

N/A

CEO Ryan McMonagle's total reported compensation of $2,577,511 is reasonable for a CEO at a $2.1 billion industrial equipment company and does not exceed our benchmark threshold. The pay mix is appropriately weighted toward variable compensation — base salary of $850,000 represents roughly 33% of total pay, well below the 40% fixed-pay ceiling, with the remainder in performance-based bonuses and equity awards tied to multi-year Adjusted EBITDA goals and stock price targets. The incentive structure is further supported by the fact that the 2025 short-term bonus paid out at only 58% of target because the company missed its free cash flow goal, demonstrating that the pay program actually penalizes executives when performance falls short. The company has a Dodd-Frank-compliant clawback policy in place, and CTOS's 3-year total shareholder return of +44.7% is broadly in line with its disclosed peer group median of +42.2%, meaning above-benchmark incentive pay — to the extent any exists — is not misaligned with shareholder experience.

Auditor Ratification

✗ AGAINST

Auditor

Ernst & Young LLP

Tenure

5 yrs

Audit Fees

$2,741,000

Non-Audit Fees

$1,939,000

⚑ non audit fee ratio exceeds 50 percent

EY received $2,741,000 in core audit fees and $1,939,000 in non-audit fees (combining audit-related fees of $1,629,000 for registration statements and M&A work plus tax fees of $310,000), producing a non-audit-to-audit ratio of approximately 71% — well above the 50% threshold that triggers a vote against. The spike in non-audit fees is driven by a large one-time M&A-related engagement in 2025; while one-time transactions can warrant a softer reading, the policy does not automatically waive the trigger, and the ratio is high enough that an independence concern is material. EY's tenure of five years is well below the 25-year concern threshold, and no restatement or auditor adequacy issues exist.

Overall Assessment

The 2026 CTOS annual meeting covers three proposals: director elections, auditor ratification, and an implied say-on-pay vote. All three Class A director nominees pass every policy screen given CTOS's strong relative stock performance versus its disclosed peer group, and the CEO pay program is reasonably structured with genuine pay-for-performance linkage; however, Ernst & Young's non-audit fees in 2025 reached approximately 71% of audit fees — driven primarily by a large M&A-related engagement — which exceeds the 50% independence threshold and warrants a vote against ratification.

Filing date: April 28, 2026·Policy v1.2·high confidence

Compensation Peer Group

15 companies disclosed in 2026 proxy filing

ALGAlamo Group
ALTGAlta Equipment
PLOWDouglas Dynamics
FSSFederal Signal
GATXGATX Corp.
GBXGreenbrier Cos.
HRIHerc Holdings
MTWManitowoc
MGRCMcGrath RentCorp
MLRMiller Industries
REVGREV Group
TEXTerex
TRNTrinity
WNCWabash
WSCWillScot Mobile