AMERICOLD REALTY INC TRUST (COLD)

Sector: Real Estate

    Home/Companies/COLD/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

AMERICOLD REALTY INC TRUST · Meeting: May 18, 2026

Policy v1.2high confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

3

Directors AGAINST

8

Say on Pay

FOR

Auditor

FOR

Director Elections

Election of Ten Director Nominees

3 FOR/8 AGAINST

Against Analysis

✗ AGAINST
Robert S. ChambersTSR underperformance trigger: 3yr COLD return -51.0% vs ^FNER +10.2%, gap of -61.2pp exceeds 30pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; director joined August 2025, within 24-month exemption window as CEO but joined board 2025 — exemption applies as director; however as executive director subject to same trigger — tenure less than 24 months, exempt

Mr. Chambers joined the board in 2025 and has been a director for less than 24 months, so he is exempt from the TSR underperformance trigger under the policy; vote FOR.

✗ AGAINST
Kelly H. BarrettTSR underperformance trigger: director since 2019 (>24 months tenure); 3yr COLD return -51.0% vs ^FNER +10.2%, gap -61.2pp exceeds 30pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; 5yr COLD return -63.0% vs ^FNER — gap also severely negative, no 5yr mitigant available to downgrade to FOR

Ms. Barrett has served on the board since 2019, well within the period of severe stock underperformance; Americold's stock has lost roughly half its value over three years while the broad equity REIT benchmark (^FNER — FTSE NAREIT All Equity REITs Index) gained over 10%, a gap of more than 61 percentage points, far exceeding the 30-point threshold that triggers an AGAINST vote, and the five-year record is equally poor, so no mitigant applies.

✗ AGAINST
Robert L. BassTSR underperformance trigger: director since November 2021 (>24 months tenure); 3yr COLD return -51.0% vs ^FNER +10.2%, gap -61.2pp exceeds 30pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; 5yr data not fully applicable but 3yr period fully overlaps with tenure since 2021

Mr. Bass has served on the board since November 2021, meaning his tenure fully overlaps with the severe three-year underperformance period; Americold's stock is down 51% over three years while the equity REIT benchmark (^FNER — FTSE NAREIT All Equity REITs Index) gained 10.2%, a gap of over 61 percentage points that far exceeds the 30-point trigger threshold, and the five-year record offers no relief.

✗ AGAINST
Antonio F. FernandezTSR underperformance trigger: director since 2019 (>24 months tenure); 3yr COLD return -51.0% vs ^FNER +10.2%, gap -61.2pp exceeds 30pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; 5yr COLD return -63.0% equally poor, no 5yr mitigant

Mr. Fernandez has served on the board since 2019 and his tenure fully encompasses the severe underperformance period; the stock is down 51% over three years versus a positive 10.2% return for the equity REIT benchmark (^FNER — FTSE NAREIT All Equity REITs Index), a gap of over 61 percentage points exceeding the 30-point trigger, with no improvement over five years.

✗ AGAINST
Pamela K. KohnTSR underperformance trigger: director since November 2021 (>24 months tenure); 3yr COLD return -51.0% vs ^FNER +10.2%, gap -61.2pp exceeds 30pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; tenure fully overlaps underperformance period

Ms. Kohn has served on the board since November 2021, placing her tenure squarely within the period of severe underperformance; the stock has lost 51% over three years while the equity REIT benchmark (^FNER — FTSE NAREIT All Equity REITs Index) gained over 10%, a gap exceeding 61 percentage points against a 30-point trigger threshold, with no five-year mitigant available.

✗ AGAINST
David J. NeithercutTSR underperformance trigger: director since 2019 (>24 months tenure); 3yr COLD return -51.0% vs ^FNER +10.2%, gap -61.2pp exceeds 30pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; 5yr COLD return -63.0% equally poor, no 5yr mitigant

Mr. Neithercut has served since 2019 and his tenure fully covers the underperformance period; the stock is down 51% over three years against a 10.2% gain for the equity REIT benchmark (^FNER — FTSE NAREIT All Equity REITs Index), a 61-percentage-point gap well above the 30-point trigger, and the five-year record is equally poor.

✗ AGAINST
Mark R. PattersonTSR underperformance trigger: director since January 2018 (>24 months tenure); 3yr COLD return -51.0% vs ^FNER +10.2%, gap -61.2pp exceeds 30pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; 5yr COLD return -63.0% equally poor, no 5yr mitigant; longest-serving director and Chairman

Mr. Patterson is the longest-serving director and Chairman, having served since 2018; the stock has declined 51% over three years while the equity REIT benchmark (^FNER — FTSE NAREIT All Equity REITs Index) rose 10.2%, a gap of over 61 percentage points far exceeding the 30-point trigger, and the five-year record at -63% offers no mitigating improvement.

✗ AGAINST
Andrew P. PowerTSR underperformance trigger: director since January 2018 (>24 months tenure); 3yr COLD return -51.0% vs ^FNER +10.2%, gap -61.2pp exceeds 30pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; 5yr COLD return -63.0% equally poor, no 5yr mitigant

Mr. Power has served on the board since 2018 and his tenure fully encompasses the underperformance period; the stock is down 51% over three years versus a 10.2% gain for the equity REIT benchmark (^FNER — FTSE NAREIT All Equity REITs Index), a gap of 61 percentage points against a 30-point trigger threshold, with no five-year improvement to serve as a mitigant.

For Analysis

✓ FOR
Robert S. Chambers

Mr. Chambers became a director in 2025 and has served less than 24 months, qualifying for the new-director exemption from the TSR trigger; no other policy concerns identified.

✓ FOR
Joseph E. Reece

Mr. Reece joined the board in December 2025 and has served less than 24 months, qualifying for the new-director exemption from the TSR underperformance trigger; no other policy concerns identified.

✓ FOR
Stephen R. Sleigh

Dr. Sleigh joined the board in December 2025 and has served less than 24 months, qualifying for the new-director exemption from the TSR underperformance trigger; no other policy concerns identified.

The TSR underperformance trigger fires for all directors who have served more than 24 months: Americold's stock is down 51% over three years while the equity REIT benchmark (^FNER — FTSE NAREIT All Equity REITs Index) gained 10.2%, a gap of 61 percentage points far exceeding the 30-point threshold applicable when absolute TSR is negative. The five-year record at -63% offers no mitigant. Seven of ten nominees (Barrett, Bass, Fernandez, Kohn, Neithercut, Patterson, Power) receive AGAINST votes. Three nominees who joined in 2025 — Chambers, Reece, and Sleigh — are exempt as new directors with less than 24 months of tenure and receive FOR votes.

Say on Pay

✓ FOR

CEO

George F. Chappelle Jr.

Total Comp

$6,272,775

Prior Support

76.6%%

The prior year Say on Pay vote received approximately 76.6% support, above the 70% threshold that would require visible remediation; the Compensation Committee responded to shareholder concerns by eliminating off-cycle equity awards and adding AFFO as a second performance metric in the long-term incentive plan, demonstrating meaningful engagement. The CEO's reported total compensation of $6,272,775 (for the transitional CEO George F. Chappelle Jr.) appears reasonable for a large-cap specialty REIT in a CEO transition year, and the pay structure is predominantly variable — with base salary representing roughly 21% of the current CEO's package — well within the policy's requirement that fixed pay not exceed 40% of total compensation. While stock performance has been severely negative, the incentive plan structure includes a negative TSR cap that prevents above-target payouts when absolute TSR is negative, which represents meaningful alignment between executive outcomes and shareholder experience.

Auditor Ratification

✓ FOR

Auditor

Ernst & Young LLP

Tenure

15 yrs

Audit Fees

$9,543,783

Non-Audit Fees

$3,767,434

Ernst & Young's non-audit fees (audit-related fees of $615,363 plus tax fees of $3,152,071, totaling approximately $3,767,434) represent about 39.5% of audit fees of $9,543,783, which is below the 50% threshold that would trigger an AGAINST vote; EY has served since 2010 (approximately 15 years), well below the 25-year tenure threshold; no material restatements were identified; and as a Big 4 firm EY is fully adequate for a company of Americold's size and complexity.

Stockholder Proposals

1 proposal submitted by shareholders

Proposal 4

Advisory Vote on Director Removal With or Without Cause

✓ FOR
Filed by:Comptroller of the City of New York, as custodian and trustee of the New York City Employees' Retirement System, the New York City Teachers' Retirement System, the New York City Police Pension Fund and the New York City Board of Education Retirement SystemInstitutional PensionGovernance
Board recommends: AGAINST
credible institutional filer: NYC Comptroller acting as pension fund trusteegovernance improvement: removes entrenching for-cause-only removal requirement and two-thirds supermajority thresholdshareholder accountability: current standard effectively immunizes directors from removal except for felony conviction or deliberate bad faith

The proposal comes from the NYC Comptroller acting as trustee for major public pension funds — a credible mainstream institutional filer with clear fiduciary motivation, not an ideological one. The ask is a core governance improvement: Americold's current rules allow director removal between annual meetings only for an extremely narrow definition of 'cause' (essentially limited to felony conviction or a court finding of deliberate bad faith) and require a two-thirds supermajority of outstanding shares, which is widely recognized as an entrenching provision that insulates the board from accountability. Given Americold's severely negative one-, three-, and five-year stock returns and the AGAINST votes triggered above for seven of ten directors, strengthening shareholder removal rights is especially timely and directly in shareholders' financial interests.

Overall Assessment

Americold's 2026 annual meeting ballot presents significant governance concerns: seven of ten director nominees receive AGAINST votes due to the company's severe stock underperformance — a 51% decline over three years versus a 10.2% gain for the equity REIT benchmark (^FNER — FTSE NAREIT All Equity REITs Index) — with no five-year mitigant available. The Say on Pay vote receives a FOR determination given adequate prior-year support, responsive changes to the incentive plan structure, and a pay mix heavily weighted toward variable compensation, while the auditor ratification is straightforward with non-audit fees well within acceptable limits and Ernst & Young's tenure of approximately 15 years below the concern threshold; the stockholder proposal on director removal rights receives a FOR vote as a meaningful governance improvement submitted by a credible institutional pension fund filer.

Filing date: April 8, 2026·Policy v1.2·high confidence