CLEANSPARK INC (CLSK)

Sector: Information Technology

    Home/Companies/CLSK/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

CLEANSPARK INC · Meeting: March 3, 2026

Policy v1.2high confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

5

Directors AGAINST

0

Say on Pay

AGAINST

Auditor

FOR

Director Elections

Election of Directors

5 FOR
✓ FOR
S. Matthew Schultz

CleanSpark's 3-year stock price return of +225.6% outpaces the XLF sector ETF benchmark by +164.2 percentage points, far exceeding the 65-point threshold required to trigger an AGAINST vote under the strong-positive-TSR tier; no overboarding, attendance, or independence concerns apply.

✓ FOR
Larry McNeill

The TSR performance trigger does not fire given the company's +164.2pp outperformance vs. the XLF benchmark; all directors attended at least 75% of meetings; no overboarding issues are noted as no CleanSpark director serves on another public company board.

✓ FOR
Roger P. Beynon

Strong stock outperformance clears the TSR trigger threshold; Mr. Beynon is a CPA and Certified Fraud Examiner who appropriately chairs the Audit Committee, and all attendance and independence requirements are met.

✓ FOR
Amanda Cavaleri

The TSR outperformance vs. the XLF benchmark (+164.2pp) is well above the 65pp trigger threshold; Ms. Cavaleri joined in 2022 and brings relevant Bitcoin and digital-asset advisory experience; no attendance, overboarding, or independence issues are disclosed.

✓ FOR
Dr. Thomas L. Wood

No TSR underperformance trigger applies given the company's substantial outperformance of the XLF benchmark; Dr. Wood serves on compensation and nominating committees as an independent director with engineering and strategic-planning expertise, and attendance requirements are fully met.

All five director nominees — including the CEO/Chairman, Lead Independent Director, and three independent directors — receive FOR votes. CleanSpark's 3-year stock return of +225.6% outperforms the XLF sector ETF by +164.2 percentage points, which is well above the 65pp threshold required to trigger an AGAINST vote under the strong-positive-TSR policy tier. No overboarding, independence, attendance, or qualification concerns are identified for any nominee.

Say on Pay

✗ AGAINST

CEO

S. Matthew Schultz

Total Comp

$44,901,507

Prior Support

76%%

CEO total compensation of $44.9 million is extremely high relative to benchmark for a $2.2B-market-cap companyPerformance-based RSU awards lack pre-set quantitative targets — committee applies wholly discretionary assessment, meaning awards vest regardless of specific outcomesIncentive plan has no meaningful pre-established performance conditions — grants awarded based on after-the-fact discretionary evaluation rather than objective targets set in advance25% of PSUs vest immediately upon grant with no performance period, effectively converting a portion of purported performance pay into guaranteed payLarge one-time discretionary RSU grants on top of regular equity substantially inflate total reported compensation with limited performance accountability

The CEO received $44.9 million in total compensation — dominated by $37.1 million in stock awards — at a company with a $2.2 billion market cap, a level that is extremely difficult to justify against any reasonable benchmark for this size of company. More critically, the company's performance stock awards (called PSUs in the proxy) have no pre-set, quantitative performance targets: the Compensation Committee explicitly states that 'the Company does not set quantitative targets in advance' and instead applies a subjective, after-the-fact evaluation. Under our policy, incentive pay that vests regardless of specific measurable outcomes is treated as fixed pay disguised as variable pay, which is a standalone reason to vote AGAINST. Compounding this concern, 25% of the PSUs vested immediately upon grant with no performance period whatsoever, and additional large discretionary RSU grants were layered on top of the regular program — resulting in a pay structure that is far above benchmark with insufficient accountability to shareholders.

Auditor Ratification

✓ FOR

Auditor

BDO USA, P.C.

Tenure

2 yrs

Audit Fees

$2,269,377

Non-Audit Fees

$142,300

BDO USA was only engaged in July 2024, giving it roughly one year of tenure — well below the 25-year threshold that would raise independence concerns. The non-audit fees of $142,300 represent about 6.3% of audit fees of $2,269,377, comfortably below the 50% limit. BDO is a large national firm fully appropriate for a $2.2 billion company, and no material restatements are disclosed.

Overall Assessment

The 2026 CleanSpark ballot contains two formal proposals: director elections and auditor ratification. All five director nominees receive FOR votes given the company's exceptional 3-year stock outperformance, and BDO USA is a newly engaged, appropriately sized auditor with a clean fee structure. However, Say on Pay does not appear on the 2026 ballot — the company holds advisory compensation votes every two years, and the most recent vote was at the 2025 annual meeting (76% support); the next vote is scheduled for 2027. Our AGAINST determination on executive compensation reflects the lack of pre-set, quantifiable performance targets for equity awards and the outsized CEO pay package relative to a $2.2 billion market-cap company.

Filing date: January 22, 2026·Policy v1.2·high confidence