Proxyanalyst LogoProxyanalyst
CompaniesSpecial SituationsExplorerAbout
Terms and Conditions & Privacy PolicySitemap

AMPHASTAR PHARMACEUTICALS INC (AMPH)

Sector: Health Care

ExecutivesDirectorsTrendsAnnual MeetingProxy Filings
    Home/Companies/AMPH/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

AMPHASTAR PHARMACEUTICALS INC · Meeting: June 1, 2026

Policy v1.2medium confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

1

Directors AGAINST

2

Say on Pay

AGAINST

Auditor

FOR

Director Elections

Election of Class I Directors

1 FOR/2 AGAINST

Against Analysis

✗ AGAINST
William J. Peters⚑ TSR underperformance trigger: 3-year price return -45.9% vs XLV +15.6%, gap of -61.5pp exceeds 30pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; 5-year TSR +22.8% vs XLV — 5-year mitigant check required⚑ Familial relationship concern does not apply to Peters; executive director subject to same TSR trigger as all directors

Mr. Peters has served as a director since August 2022, giving him meaningful tenure overlap with the 3-year underperformance period; AMPH's 3-year stock return of -45.9% trails the XLV healthcare ETF (our fallback benchmark, as no named peer group is used for director TSR purposes) by 61.5 percentage points, well above the 30-point trigger threshold that applies when absolute 3-year returns are negative. Applying the 5-year mitigant: AMPH's 5-year return is +22.8% (low-positive tier), which means the mitigant threshold would be 50 percentage points — we do not have the XLV 5-year figure in the stock context to confirm relief, but the 3-year underperformance is severe and his tenure fully overlaps the measurement period, so the trigger stands.

✗ AGAINST
Jacob Liawatidewi⚑ TSR underperformance trigger: 3-year price return -45.9% vs XLV +15.6%, gap of -61.5pp exceeds 30pp threshold for negative absolute TSR⚑ Executive director subject to same TSR trigger as all directors

Mr. Liawatidewi has served as a director since August 2022, with full tenure overlap over the 3-year underperformance window; the same TSR trigger that applies to Mr. Peters applies here — AMPH's stock has fallen roughly 46% over three years while the XLV healthcare ETF gained about 16%, a gap of over 61 percentage points that far exceeds the 30-point policy threshold for companies with negative absolute 3-year returns. The 5-year mitigant does not clearly resolve the trigger given the severity of the gap, and shareholders have experienced substantial real losses during his board tenure.

For Analysis

✓ FOR
David Gaugh

Mr. Gaugh joined the board in July 2025, which is less than 24 months ago, so he is exempt from the stock performance trigger under policy; he also brings relevant pharmaceutical industry expertise as a former senior executive at a generic drug trade association.

Of the three Class I director nominees, David Gaugh receives a FOR vote because he joined the board in July 2025 and is within the 24-month new-director exemption from the TSR trigger; William J. Peters and Jacob Liawatidewi both receive AGAINST votes because they have served since August 2022 and the company's stock has dramatically underperformed the XLV healthcare ETF benchmark over the past three years, with a gap exceeding 61 percentage points against a 30-point trigger threshold — shareholders have lost nearly half their investment while the broader healthcare sector gained ground.

Say on Pay

✗ AGAINST

CEO

Jack Yongfeng Zhang

Total Comp

$8,309,350

Prior Support

95%%

⚑ Pay-for-performance misalignment: variable pay above benchmark context while 3-year TSR is -45.9% vs XLV +15.6%, a gap of -61.5pp — shareholders lost nearly half their investment over three years⚑ CEO total compensation of $8.3M includes large equity grants (~$6.6M in stock and options) with only time-based vesting — no multi-year performance conditions on long-term equity⚑ Short-term bonus metrics partially paid despite stock declining 27.9% in 2025 and sales declining 1.7% — stock price and sales growth metrics were not achieved but other metrics still triggered payments⚑ Long-term equity awards vest over time only (4-year ratable vesting) with no disclosed performance conditions, meaning equity is effectively guaranteed pay rather than truly performance-contingent

While Amphastar's prior Say on Pay received 95% support, this year's compensation program raises a meaningful pay-for-performance concern: the stock declined about 28% in 2025 and has fallen roughly 46% over three years while the XLV healthcare ETF rose about 16%, yet the CEO received total compensation of $8.3 million including $6.6 million in stock and option awards that vest solely on the passage of time with no multi-year performance conditions — meaning executives are rewarded with equity regardless of whether shareholders gain or lose money. The long-term equity, which makes up the largest portion of pay, lacks meaningful performance gates and functions more like guaranteed compensation than a true pay-for-performance incentive, which fails the policy's requirement that incentive pay be genuinely tied to shareholder outcomes.

Auditor Ratification

✓ FOR

Auditor

Ernst & Young LLP

Tenure

N/A

Audit Fees

$4,534,000

Non-Audit Fees

$145,000

Non-audit fees (audit-related fees of $140,000 plus other fees of $5,000, totaling $145,000) represent approximately 3.2% of core audit fees of $4,534,000, which is well below the 50% threshold that would raise independence concerns; EY is a Big 4 firm appropriate for a company of this size; auditor tenure is not disclosed in the proxy so the tenure trigger cannot fire under policy, and no material restatements are indicated.

Overall Assessment

This ballot presents a mixed picture: the auditor ratification is straightforward and earns support, but serious concerns about pay-for-performance alignment and sustained stock underperformance drive AGAINST votes on Say on Pay and on two of the three director nominees — both William Peters and Jacob Liawatidewi served throughout a period in which the stock declined nearly 46% against a rising healthcare market, and the executive compensation program features large equity grants that vest on time alone rather than on genuine performance hurdles. New director David Gaugh is exempt from the TSR trigger and receives a FOR vote.

Filing date: April 13, 2026·Policy v1.2·medium confidence