PROFRAC HOLDING CLASS A CORP (ACDC)

Sector: Energy

    Home/Companies/ACDC/Annual Meeting

2026 Annual Meeting Analysis

PROFRAC HOLDING CLASS A CORP · Meeting: May 27, 2026

Policy v1.2high confidenceView Filing ↗
For informational purposes only. This AI-generated analysis applies a published voting policy to publicly available proxy filings. It does not constitute investment advice, proxy voting advice, or a solicitation of any kind. AI analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate — always review the actual filing and make your own independent decision.

Directors FOR

0

Directors AGAINST

6

Say on Pay

FOR

Auditor

FOR

Director Elections

Election of Directors

/6 AGAINST

Against Analysis

✗ AGAINST
Matthew D. WilksTSR trigger: 3-year price return -36.1% vs XLE +49.2%, gap of -85.3pp exceeds 30pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; director since May 2022 (tenure > 24 months); familial relationship to founders (son of Dan Wilks, nephew of Farris Wilks)

Matthew D. Wilks has served since May 2022, so the full 3-year underperformance period falls within his tenure; ACDC's 3-year return of -36.1% trails XLE (the sector ETF benchmark) by 85.3 percentage points, far exceeding the 30-point trigger threshold for a company with negative absolute returns, and the 5-year return of -60.0% vs XLE similarly remains deeply negative, so the 5-year mitigant does not apply; additionally, as the son of founder Dan Wilks and nephew of founder Farris Wilks he has a close familial relationship to the controlling shareholders, which is an independent governance concern.

✗ AGAINST
Theresa GlebockiTSR trigger: 3-year price return -36.1% vs XLE +49.2%, gap of -85.3pp exceeds 30pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; director since May 2022 (tenure > 24 months)

Ms. Glebocki has served since May 2022, meaning the full 3-year underperformance period falls within her tenure; ACDC's stock has lost 36.1% over three years while the XLE energy sector ETF gained 49.2%, a gap of 85.3 percentage points that far exceeds the 30-point threshold required to trigger an against vote under the policy; the 5-year return of -60.0% against a strongly positive XLE means the 5-year mitigant does not rescue the vote.

✗ AGAINST
Gerald HaddockTSR trigger: 3-year price return -36.1% vs XLE +49.2%, gap of -85.3pp exceeds 30pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; director since May 2022 (tenure > 24 months)

Mr. Haddock has served since May 2022, so the full 3-year underperformance period falls within his tenure; the 85.3 percentage-point gap between ACDC's -36.1% return and XLE's +49.2% return vastly exceeds the 30-point trigger, and the 5-year return of -60.0% confirms sustained underperformance rather than a transient trough, so the 5-year mitigant does not apply.

✗ AGAINST
Sergei KrylovTSR trigger: 3-year price return -36.1% vs XLE +49.2%, gap of -85.3pp exceeds 30pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; director since May 2022 (tenure > 24 months)

Mr. Krylov has served since May 2022, placing him fully within the 3-year underperformance period; ACDC's stock declined 36.1% while the XLE gained 49.2% over the same period, an 85.3-point gap that triggers the against vote, and the 5-year return of -60.0% means the longer-term record does not provide a mitigating offset.

✗ AGAINST
Stacy NieuwoudtTSR trigger: 3-year price return -36.1% vs XLE +49.2%, gap of -85.3pp exceeds 30pp threshold for negative absolute TSR; director since May 2022 (tenure > 24 months)

Ms. Nieuwoudt has served since May 2022, so her tenure fully overlaps with the 3-year underperformance window; the 85.3-point gap between ACDC's -36.1% and XLE's +49.2% far exceeds the 30-point policy threshold, and both 3-year and 5-year stock performance are deeply negative, so no mitigant applies.

✗ AGAINST
Matthew RinaldiFamilial/affiliation concern: General Counsel of FARJO Holdings LP, a Wilks Party controlling shareholder entity; independence questionable

Mr. Rinaldi joined the board in December 2025, which is less than 24 months ago, so he is exempt from the TSR trigger under the policy; however, he serves as General Counsel of FARJO Holdings LP, one of the principal controlling shareholders (Farris Wilks family entities), meaning he has a direct employment relationship with the controlling shareholders rather than being a genuinely independent voice, which is a material governance concern that warrants an against vote on qualification grounds.

For Analysis

All five directors who have served since May 2022 are subject to an AGAINST vote because ACDC's 3-year stock return of -36.1% trails the XLE energy sector ETF by 85.3 percentage points — far exceeding the 30-point trigger for companies with negative absolute returns — and the 5-year return of -60.0% confirms this is sustained underperformance rather than a temporary dip; additionally, Matthew D. Wilks receives an against vote on the independent ground of close familial ties to the controlling founders; Matthew Rinaldi, while exempt from the TSR trigger as a recent joiner, receives an against vote because his role as General Counsel of a Wilks controlling-shareholder entity undermines his independence.

Say on Pay

✓ FOR

CEO

Matthew D. Wilks

Total Comp

$1,404,204

Prior Support

N/A

The principal executive officer Matthew D. Wilks received total compensation of $1,404,204 in 2025, which for a $1.3 billion energy-sector company is within a reasonable range and does not appear to exceed the benchmark thresholds; the pay program includes meaningful performance conditions — 60% of long-term equity awards are performance-based stock awards tied to Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Free Cash Flow, and other corporate objectives, with payouts ranging from 0% to 200% of target, and the annual bonus plan also uses objective financial metrics — so the incentive compensation is not effectively disguised fixed pay. Although both Matthew D. Wilks and Johnathan L. Wilks voluntarily declined to receive their 2025 annual bonus payments (a genuine act of restraint given poor company performance), the pay structure itself is sufficiently performance-oriented, the company has a clawback policy in place, and the pay levels are not materially above benchmark, so the program passes the policy screens.

Auditor Ratification

✓ FOR

Auditor

Grant Thornton LLP

Tenure

7 yrs

Audit Fees

$2,458,306

Non-Audit Fees

$270,935

Grant Thornton has served as ProFrac's auditor since 2018, giving it approximately 7 years of tenure — well below the 25-year threshold that would trigger concern; the non-audit fees of $270,935 represent roughly 11% of the $2,458,306 in audit fees, far below the 50% threshold that would raise independence concerns; Grant Thornton is a large national firm appropriate for a $1.3 billion market-cap company, so no adequacy concerns arise.

Overall Assessment

The 2026 ProFrac annual meeting ballot presents three standard proposals; the auditor ratification and say-on-pay votes both pass policy screens and warrant support, but all six director nominees receive AGAINST recommendations — five because the stock has severely underperformed the XLE energy sector ETF by 85 percentage points over three years (with no 5-year mitigant available given even deeper long-term losses), and the sixth because his role as General Counsel of the Wilks family's controlling-shareholder entity raises fundamental independence concerns.

Filing date: April 27, 2026·Policy v1.2·high confidence